Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • 188 Accesses

Abstract

While the case study in this book is Britain, this book is really about leadership and the role that leaders play in the formation of effective balances of power. This book was written with the expectation that the balance of power as a mechanism for preserving systemic stability and geopolitical independence has returned to prominence in recent years. Absent world government and in the anarchic order in which international politics plays out, the ability of great powers to forcibly deny the territorial and geopolitical ambitions of other great powers historically has been crucial in preventing any one state from exercising complete hegemony over the international system and controlling global resources for its exclusive use. In more recent times, arguments have been advanced that posit that the sharp edges of international politics can be blunted by channeling interactions through the agency of international institutions but, even according to theorists oriented to this approach, the ultimate guarantor of independence in the international system lies in the ability to deny the ambitions of others by force.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Power and Interdependence (New York: Longman, 2001), chap. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man (New York: Free Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robert A. Doughty, “The Maginot Line,” MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History 9, no. 2 (1997): 48–59, especially 51.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brian Bond, British Military Policy between the Two World Wars (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980), 201–2.

    Google Scholar 

  5. On the insistence of Sir Thomas Inskip, minister for the coordination of defence, to build fighters while the air ministry wanted bombers, see Charles Webster and Noble Frankland, The Strategic Air Offensive Against Germany: 1939–1945, Vol. 1 (London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1961), 75–77.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tami D. Biddle, Rhetoric and Reality in Air Warfare (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002), 121.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.P. Harris, “British Armour and Rearmament in the 1930s,” The Journal of Strategic Studies 11, no. 2 (June 1988): 220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. B.H. Liddel Hart, History of the Second World War (New York: G.B. Putnam’s & Sons, 1971), 117.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For more on Percy Hobart, see Trevor J. Constable, Hidden Heroes (London: Arthur Baker’s Ltd., 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arend Lijphart, “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method,” The American Political Science Review 65, no. 3 (September 1971): 682–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alexander George, “Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison,” in Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory and Policy, Paul Gordon Lauren, ed. (New York: Free Press, 1979), 58.

    Google Scholar 

  12. James D. Fearon, “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing Political Science,” World Politics 43 (1991): 169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Robert Jervis, System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baldwin had wanted to bring Churchill into the cabinet but he was thwarted in that endeavor by his Tory colleagues. Baldwin, however, looked on the bright side, and wrote to a friend about Churchill saying, “If there is going to be a war—and no can say there is not—we must keep him fresh to be our War Prime Minister.” Quoted in Kenneth Young, Stanley Baldwin (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1976), 112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Ariel Ilan Roth

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roth, A.I. (2010). Introduction. In: Leadership in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113534_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics