Abstract
The field of comparative literature has been the site of an intensifying struggle for both self-definition and validation. This struggle can best be observed in the dialogue in two collections of essays published under the auspices of the American Comparative Literature Association (ACLA): Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization (2006) and Comparative Literature in the Age of Multiculturalism (1995) (see Saussy; Bernheimer). While each provides an ACLA ten-year report on the state of the discipline, the latter prints three reports to the ACLA and a range of responses to them. Any discussion of the history and definition of comparative literary studies must begin with Henry Remak’s famous definition of the field: “Comparative Literature is the study of a literature beyond the confines of one particular country, and the study of the relationships between literature on the one hand and other areas of knowledge and belief, such as the arts (e.g. painting, sculpture, architecture, music), philosophy, history, the social sciences, religion, et cetera, on the other. In brief, it is the comparison of one literature with other spheres of human expression” (3). Jonathan Culler essentially dismisses the latter part of this formulation, suggesting that comparative literature should be concerned precisely and only with literature, rather than “with the other spheres of human expression.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works Cited
Alan of Lille. The Plaint of Nature. Ed. James J. Sheridan. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1980.
Aldridge, A. Owen. Comparative Literature: Matter and Method. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1969.
Amer, Sahar. Crossing Borders: Love between Women in Medieval French and Arabic Literatures. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 2008.
Bassnett, Susan. Comparative Literature: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.
Bernheimer, Charles, ed. Comparative Literature in the Age of Multiculturalism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1995.
Bloch, R. Howard. Etymologies and Genealogies: A Literary Anthropology of the French Middle Ages. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1983.
——. “Silence and Holes: The Roman de Silence and the Art of the Trouvère.” Yale French Studies 70 (1986): 81–99.
Boellstorff, Tom. A Coincidence of Desires: Anthropology, Queer Studies, Indonesia. Durham: Duke UP, 2007.
Burgwinkle, William. Sodomy, Masculinity and Law in Medieval Literature, France and England, 1050–1230. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004.
Butler, Judith. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” London: Routledge, 1993.
——. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge, 1990.
Clark, Robert L. A. “Queering Gender and Naturalizing Class in the Roman de Silence.” Arthuriana 12.1 (2002): 50–63.
Cooper, Kate Mason. “Elle and L: Sexualized Textuality in Le Roman de Silence.” Romance Notes 25.3 (1985): 341–60.
Culler, Jonathan. “Comparative Literature, at Last!” Bernheimer 117–21.
Damrosch, David. “World Literature in a Postcanonical, Hypercanonical Age.” Saussy 43–53.
Dinshaw, Carolyn. Getting Medieval: Sexualities and Communities, Pre- and Postmodern. Durham: Duke UP, 1999.
Eckhardt, Caroline D. “Old Fields, New Corn, and Present Ways of Writing About the Past.” Saussy 139–54.
Ferris, David. “Indiscipline.” Saussy 78–99.
Frantzen, Allen J. Before the Closet: Same-Sex Love from “Beowulf” to “Angels in America.” Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1998.
Gaunt, Simon. Retelling the Tale: An Introduction to Medieval French Literature. London: Duckworth, 2001.
——. “The Significance of Silence.” Paragraph: A Journal of Modern Critical Theory 13.2 (1990): 202–16.
Guillaume de Lorris and Jean de Meun. The Romance of the Rose. Ed. Charles Dahlberg. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1971. Repr. Hanover: UP of New England, 1986.
Hayes, Jarrod. Queer Nations: Marginal Sexualities in the Maghreb. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2000.
Heldris of Cornwall. Silence: A Thirteenth-Century French Romance. Ed. Sarah Roche-Mahdi. East Lansing: Colleagues, 1992.
Hokenson, Jan Walsh. “The Culture of the Context: Literature Past and Future.” Comparative Literature and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek. West Lafayette: Purdue UP, 2003. 58–75.
Howie, Cary. Claustrophilia: The Erotics of Enclosure in Medieval Literature. New York: Palgrave, 2007.
Hult, David F. “Language and Dismemberment: Abelard, Origen, and the Romance of the Rose.” Rethinking the “Romance of the Rose.” Ed. Kevin Brownlee and Sylvia Huot. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1992. 101–30.
Huot, Sylvia. From Song to Book: The Poetics of Writing in Old French Lyric and Lyrical Narrative Poetry. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1987.
Kay, Sarah. “Sexual Knowledge: The Once and Future Texts of the Romance of the Rose.” Textuality and Sexuality: Reading Theories and Practices. Ed. Judith Still and Michael Worton. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1993. 69–86.
——. “Women’s Body of Knowledge: Epistemology and Misogyny in the Romance of the Rose.” Framing Medieval Bodies. Ed. Sarah Kay and Miri Rubin. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1994. 211–35.
Khan, Robert Omar. “Genealogy and Cross-Gendering in Le Roman de Silence and Ariake no Wakare.” Arthuriana 12.1 (2002): 76–84.
Lochrie, Karma. Heterosyncrasies: Female Sexuality When Normal Wasn’t. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2005.
Lochrie, Karma, Peggy McCracken, and James Schultz, eds. Constructing Medieval Sexuality. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1997.
McCracken, Peggy. “‘The Boy Who Was a Girl’: Reading Gender in the Roman de Silence.” The Romantic Review 85.4 (1984): 517–36.
Newman, Barbara. God and the Goddesses: Vision, Poetry, and Belief in the Middle Ages. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 2003.
Patton, Cindy, and Benigno Sá.nchez-Eppler, eds. Queer Diasporas. Durham: Duke UP, 2000.
Provencher, Denis M. Queer French: Globalization, Language, and Sexual Citizenship in France. Surrey: Ashgate, 2007.
Quilligan, Maureen. “Allegory, Allegoresis, and the Deallegorization of Language: The Roman de la Rose, the De Planctu Naturae, and the Parlement of Foules.” Allegory, Myth, and Symbol. Ed. Morton W. Bloomfield. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1981. 163–86.
Remak, Henry H. H. “Comparative Literature: Its Definition and Function.” Comparative Literature: Method and Perspective. Ed. Newton Stallknecht and Horst Frenz. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1971. 1–57.
Saussy, Haun, ed. Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins UP, 2006.
Sturges, Robert S. Chaucer’s Pardoner and Gender Theory: Bodies of Discourse. New York: Palgrave, 2000.
Zeikowitz, Richard E. Homoeroticism and Chivalry: Discourses of Male Same-Sex Desire in the 14th Century. New York: Palgrave, 2003.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2010 Jarrod Hayes, Margaret R. Higonnet, and William J. Spurlin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Campbell, K. (2010). Queer from the Very Beginning. In: Hayes, J., Higonnet, M.R., Spurlin, W.J. (eds) Comparatively Queer. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113442_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113442_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28890-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11344-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)