Abstract
In Chapter 2 we identified the component practices constituting international punishment: a set of nonvoluntary categorical obligations of universal scope and reach, universal interest in compliance with them, and universal standing to enforce compliance or sanction noncompliance. In Chapter 3 we traced the development of a new conceptualization of categorical obligation befitting the modern Positivist-Voluntarist understanding of obligation. In Chapter 4 we analyzed a sort of obligation that while not in se peremptory is still universally binding and ex hypothesi universally enforceable. Unlike classical punishment, however, these forms of obligation grant at most standing to take legal action and pursue legal vindication of the obligations; they do not entail grounds for the use of force.
A state has jurisdiction to define and prescribe punishment for certain offenses recognized by the community of nations as of universal concern, such as piracy, slave trade … genocide, war crimes … even when none of the [traditional] bases of jurisdiction … is present… Universal jurisdiction over the specified offenses is a result of universal condemnation of these activities and general interest in cooperating to suppress them.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Edward M. Wise, “Extradition: The Hypothesis of a Civitas Maxima and the Maxim Aut Dedere Aut Judicare” Revue Internationale de Droit Penal/International Review of Penal Law 62 (New Series) (1991): 109–133;
Colleen Enache-Brown and Ari Fried, “Universal Crime, Jurisdiction and Duty: The Obligation of Aut Dedere Aut Judicare in International Law,” McGill Law Journal/Revue de Droit de McGill 43 (1998): 613–633;
M. Cherif Bassiouni, Introduction to International Criminal Law (Ardsley: Transnational Publishers, 2003), 334–346.
Jordan J. Paust et al., International Criminal Law: Cases and Materials 3rd (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2007), 155.
Thomas H. Sponsler, “The Universality Principle and the Threatened Trials of American Airmen,” Loyola Law Review 15 (1968): 43–44;
Kenneth C. Randall, “Universal Jurisdiction Under International Law,” Texas Law Review 66 (1988): 788;
Jon B. Jordan, “Universal Jurisdiction in a Dangerous World,” MSU-DCL Journal of International Law 9 (2000): 3–5;
Leila Nadya Sadat, “Redefining Universal Jurisdiction,” New England Law Review 35 (2001): 246;
Bartram S. Brown, “The Evolving Concept of Universal Jurisdiction,” New England Law Review 35 (2001): 383–384;
Luc Reydams, Universal Jurisdiction: International and Municipal Legal Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003);
Bruce Broomhall, International Justice and the International Criminal Court (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 106;
Stephen Macedo, ed. Universal Jurisdiction: National Courts and the Prosecution of Serious Crimes under International Law (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004), 21
Yana Shy Kraytman, “Universal Jurisdiction—Historical Roots and Modern Implications,” BSIS Journal of International Studies 2 (2005): 94–95;
Beth van Schaack and Ronald C. Slye, International Criminal Law and Its Enforcement: Cases and Materials (New York: Foundation Press, 2007), 100;
Alexander Zahar and Göran Sluiter, International Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 496;
Florian Jessberger, “Universal Jurisdiction,” in Antonio Cassese, ed., The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 555–558.
M. Cherif Bassiouni, Crimes Against Humanity in International Criminal Law 2nd (Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International, 1999), 229.
Wade Estey, “The Five Bases of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction and the Failure of the Presumption Against Extraterritoriality,” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 21 (1997–1998): 204.
Henry J. Steiner, “Three Cheers for Universal Jurisdiction—Or Is It Only Two?” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 5 (2004): 204.
M. Cherif Bassiouni, “Universal Jurisdiction for International Crimes: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Practice,” Virginia Journal of International Law 42 (2001): 88;
Christopher C. Joyner, “Arresting Impunity: The Case for Universal Jurisdiction in Bringing War Criminals to Accountability,” Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (1997): 169.
Gerhard Werle, Principles of International Criminal Law (Cambridge T.M.C. Asser Press, 2005), 58–59.
Willard B. Cowles, “Universality of Jurisdiction over War Crimes,” California Law Review 33 (1945): 188–194;
Madeline H. Morris, “Universal Jurisdiction in a Divided World,” New England Law Review 35 (2001): 339–340;
Michael P. Scharf, “Application of Treaty-Based Universal Jurisdiction to Nationals of Non-Party States,” New England Law Review 35 (2001): 369–370;
Bruce Broomhall, “Toward the Development of an Effective System of Universal Jurisdiction for Crimes under International Law,” New England Law Review 35 (2001): 402;
Antonio Cassese, “Is the Bell Tolling for Universality? A Plea for a Sensible Notion of Universal Jurisdiction,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 1 (2003): 284;
Lassa Oppenheim, International Law: A Treatise (8th ed. vol. 1, Hersch Lauterpacht, ed.) (New York: Longman, Green, 1955), 609.
J.L. Brierly, The Law of Nations 6th ed. (Sir Humphrey Waldock, ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963), 311.
Georges Abi-Saab, “The Proper Role of Universals Jurisdiction,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 1 (2003): 599.
Jörg Kammerhofer, “Uncertainty in the Formal Sources of International Law: Customary International Law and Some of Its Problems,” European Journal of International Law 15 (2003): 534–535;
Ian Brownlie, “Methodological Problems in International Law and Development,” Journal of African Law 26 (1982): 10.
Anthony Aust, Modern Treaty Law and Practice 2nd (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 256–261;
Bassiouni, “Enslavement as an International Crime,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 23 (1991): 461.
Fischer, “The Suppression of Slavery in International Law (1),” International Law Quarterly 3 (1950): 45.
Dame Rosalyn Higgins, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 58.
Gary Bass, Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000), 58–146
Eugene Davidson, The Trial of the Germans: An Account of the Twenty-Two Defendants before the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg (New York: Macmillan, 1966).
Henry T King Jr., “Universal Jurisdiction: Myths, Realities, Prospects, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity: The Nuremberg Precedent,” New England Law Review 35 (2001): 281–282.
Hannah Arendt, Eichman in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (New York: Viking Press, 1964);
Gideon Hausner, Justice in Jerusalem (New York: Harper & Row, 1966);
Lord Russell of Liverpool, The Record: The Trial of Adolf Eichmann for his Crimes against the Jewish People and against Humanity (New York: Alfred P. Knopf, 1963).
Neil Boister and Richard Burchill, “The Pinochet Precedent: Don’t Leave Home Without It,” Criminal Law Forum 10 (1999): 412–413.
Henley, “Sovereignty, Augusto Pinochet, and Legal Positivism,” Human Rights Review 8 (2006): 72–74.
Lord Millett, “The Pinochet Case— Some Personal Reflections,” in Malcolm Evans, ed., International Law 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 9.
Naomi Roht-Arriaza, “The Pinochet Precedent and Universal Jurisdiction,” New England Law Review 35 (2001): 313.
Antonio Cassese, “When May Senior State Officials Be Tried for International Crimes? Some Comments on the Congo v. Belgium Case,” European Journal of International Law 13 (2002): 856.
For a detailed history of changes to the Belgian legislation, see Luc Reydams, “Belgium Reneges on Universality: The 5 August 2003 Act on Grave Breaches of International Humanitarian Law,” Journal of International Criminal Law 1 (2003a): 679–689;
Steven R. Ratner, “Belgium’s War Crimes Statute: A Postmortem,” American journal of International Law 97 (2003): 889–892;
Tom Ongena and Ignace van Daele, “Universal Jurisdiction for International Core Crimes: Recent Developments in Belgium,” Leiden Journal of International Law 15 (2002): 696–701.
Luc Reydams, “Universal Criminal Jurisdiction: The Belgian State of Affairs,” Criminal Law Forum 11 (2000): 186–197.
See Malvinia Halberstam, “Belgium’s Universal Juris-dictional Law: Vindication of International Justice or Pursuit of Politics?” Cardozo Law Review 25 (2003): 247–266
Christian Tomuschat and Jean-Marc Thouvenin, eds, The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006), 249.
Steffen Wirth, “Immunity for Core Crimes? The ICJ’s Judgment in the Congo v. Belgium Case,” European Journal of International Law 13 (2002): 883–891;
Maria Spinedi, “State Responsibility v. Individual Responsibility for International Crimes: Tertium non Datur?” European Journal of International Law 13 (2002): 897–899;
Phillipe Sands, “International Law Transformed? From Pinochet to Congo …?” Leiden Journal of International Law 16 (2003): 49–53.
James Crawford, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text, and Commentaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 48.
Copyright information
© 2010 Harry D. Gould
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gould, H.D. (2010). The Principle of Universal Jurisdiction. In: The Legacy of Punishment in International Law. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113077_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113077_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28894-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11307-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)