Abstract
The Supreme Court of Canada’s 1999 Marshall Decision recognized the treaty rights of the Mi’kmaq people to fish commercially, sparking a violent backlash from nonindigenous fishers across the region. The case was the result of generations of struggle for recognition of the eighteenth-century Peace and Friendship Treaties and the inherent rights they were meant to protect. But as Bear River First Nation has learned in the ten years since the Marshall Decision, treaty rights “recognition” in the maritime provinces, on Canada’s Atlantic coast, is being enacted through a process of assimilating Indigenous Peoples into the neoliberal capitalist fishing industry. It is a process that has relied on the centuries-old divide and rule tactics—between First Nations, and between Indigenous and nonindigenous fishing communities—that have so fundamentally etched racism into Nova Scotia’s social fabric. This process has solidified Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO)’s control over fisheries management in the interests of furthering a neoliberal program of resource privatization and corporate concentration of ownership in the industry (Davis & Jentoft, 2001; Stiegman, 2009; Wiber & Kennedy, 2001).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
“R. v. Marshall [No.1].” [1999] 3S.C.R. 456
“R. v. Syliboy [1928]” 50 C.C.C. 389
Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans [DFO] (1982). Task force on Atlantic fisheries. Navigating troubled waters: A new policy for the Atlantic fisheries: Highlights and recommendations. Ottawa: DFO.
Coates, K. (2000). The Marshall decision and native rights. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Davis, A. (1991). Insidious rationalities: The institutionalisation of small boat fishing and the rise of the rapacious fisher. Retrieved from http://www.stfx.ca/research/gbayesp/insidious_report.htm.
Davis, A., & S. Jentoft. (2001). The challenge and the promise of indigenous peoples’ fishing rights—from dependency to agency. Marine Policy 25(3), 223–237.
Grand Council of Micmacs, Union of Nova Scotia Indians, Native Council of Nova Scotia (1987). The Mi’kmaq treaty handbook. Sydney & Truro: Native Communications Society of Nova Scotia.
Kerans, P., & J. Kearney. (2006). Turning the world right side up: Science, community, and democracy. Halifax: Fernwood.
Marshall, D. Sr., A. Denny, & S. Marshall. (1989). The covenant chain [of the Mi’kmaq]. In Drumbeat: Anger and renewal in Indian country, ed. B. Richardson, pp. 71–104. Toronto: Summerhill Press.
Mcintosh, P. & J. Kearney (2002). Enhancing natural resources and livelihoods globally through community-based resource management. Proceedings from the Learning and Innovations Institute, November 6–9.
Milley, C., & A. Charles. (2001). Mi’kmaq fisheries in Atlantic Canada: Traditions, legal decisions and community management. Paper presented at the People and the Sea: Maritime Research in the Social Sciences: An Agenda for the 21st Century, Amsterdam.
Nadasdy, P. (2003). Hunters and bureaucrats: Power, knowledge, and aboriginal-state relations in the Southwest Yukon. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Obomsawin, A. (1984). Incident at Restigouche. 45 min 57 s. Canada: National Film Board of Canada.
Obomsawin, A. (2002). Is the Crown at War with Us? 96 min 31 s. Canada: National Film Board of Canada.
Pictou, S. & A. Bull. (2009). Resource extraction in the Maritimes: Historic links with racism. New Socialist 1, 38–39.
Prosper, K., M. J. Paulette, & A. Davis. (2004, August). Traditional wisdom can build a sustainable future. Atlantic Fisherman, 2.
Rodríguez, C. (2001). Fissures in the mediascape: An international study of citizens’ media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Veltmeyer, H. (1990). The restructuring of capital and the regional problem. In Restructuring and resistance from Atlantic Canada, ed. B. Fairley, C. Leys, & J. Sacouman, pp. 79–104. Toronto: Garamond Press.
Wiber, M. & A. Bull. (2009). Re-scaling governance for better resource management? In Rules of law and laws of ruling: On the governance of law, ed. F. von Benda-Beckmann, K. von Benda-Beckmann, & J. Eckert, pp. 151–170. Burlington: Ashgate.
Wiber, M., & J. Kennedy. (2001). Impossible dreams: Reforming fisheries management in the Canadian Maritimes after the Marshall Decision. Law & Anthropology 11, 282–297.
Wicken, W. C. (2002). Mi’kmaq treaties on trial: History, land, and Donald Marshall Junior. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2010 Aziz Choudry and Dip Kapoor
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stiegman, M., Pictou, S. (2010). How Do You Say Netuklimk in English? Using Documentary Video to Capture Bear River First Nation’s Learning through Action. In: Choudry, A., Kapoor, D. (eds) Learning from the Ground Up. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230112650_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230112650_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38315-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11265-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)