Skip to main content

How Do You Say Netuklimk in English? Using Documentary Video to Capture Bear River First Nation’s Learning through Action

  • Chapter

Abstract

The Supreme Court of Canada’s 1999 Marshall Decision recognized the treaty rights of the Mi’kmaq people to fish commercially, sparking a violent backlash from nonindigenous fishers across the region. The case was the result of generations of struggle for recognition of the eighteenth-century Peace and Friendship Treaties and the inherent rights they were meant to protect. But as Bear River First Nation has learned in the ten years since the Marshall Decision, treaty rights “recognition” in the maritime provinces, on Canada’s Atlantic coast, is being enacted through a process of assimilating Indigenous Peoples into the neoliberal capitalist fishing industry. It is a process that has relied on the centuries-old divide and rule tactics—between First Nations, and between Indigenous and nonindigenous fishing communities—that have so fundamentally etched racism into Nova Scotia’s social fabric. This process has solidified Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO)’s control over fisheries management in the interests of furthering a neoliberal program of resource privatization and corporate concentration of ownership in the industry (Davis & Jentoft, 2001; Stiegman, 2009; Wiber & Kennedy, 2001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • R. v. Marshall [No.1].” [1999] 3S.C.R. 456

    Google Scholar 

  • R. v. Syliboy [1928]” 50 C.C.C. 389

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans [DFO] (1982). Task force on Atlantic fisheries. Navigating troubled waters: A new policy for the Atlantic fisheries: Highlights and recommendations. Ottawa: DFO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, K. (2000). The Marshall decision and native rights. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. (1991). Insidious rationalities: The institutionalisation of small boat fishing and the rise of the rapacious fisher. Retrieved from http://www.stfx.ca/research/gbayesp/insidious_report.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A., & S. Jentoft. (2001). The challenge and the promise of indigenous peoples’ fishing rights—from dependency to agency. Marine Policy 25(3), 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grand Council of Micmacs, Union of Nova Scotia Indians, Native Council of Nova Scotia (1987). The Mi’kmaq treaty handbook. Sydney & Truro: Native Communications Society of Nova Scotia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerans, P., & J. Kearney. (2006). Turning the world right side up: Science, community, and democracy. Halifax: Fernwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. Sr., A. Denny, & S. Marshall. (1989). The covenant chain [of the Mi’kmaq]. In Drumbeat: Anger and renewal in Indian country, ed. B. Richardson, pp. 71–104. Toronto: Summerhill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcintosh, P. & J. Kearney (2002). Enhancing natural resources and livelihoods globally through community-based resource management. Proceedings from the Learning and Innovations Institute, November 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milley, C., & A. Charles. (2001). Mi’kmaq fisheries in Atlantic Canada: Traditions, legal decisions and community management. Paper presented at the People and the Sea: Maritime Research in the Social Sciences: An Agenda for the 21st Century, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadasdy, P. (2003). Hunters and bureaucrats: Power, knowledge, and aboriginal-state relations in the Southwest Yukon. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obomsawin, A. (1984). Incident at Restigouche. 45 min 57 s. Canada: National Film Board of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obomsawin, A. (2002). Is the Crown at War with Us? 96 min 31 s. Canada: National Film Board of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pictou, S. & A. Bull. (2009). Resource extraction in the Maritimes: Historic links with racism. New Socialist 1, 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosper, K., M. J. Paulette, & A. Davis. (2004, August). Traditional wisdom can build a sustainable future. Atlantic Fisherman, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, C. (2001). Fissures in the mediascape: An international study of citizens’ media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veltmeyer, H. (1990). The restructuring of capital and the regional problem. In Restructuring and resistance from Atlantic Canada, ed. B. Fairley, C. Leys, & J. Sacouman, pp. 79–104. Toronto: Garamond Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiber, M. & A. Bull. (2009). Re-scaling governance for better resource management? In Rules of law and laws of ruling: On the governance of law, ed. F. von Benda-Beckmann, K. von Benda-Beckmann, & J. Eckert, pp. 151–170. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiber, M., & J. Kennedy. (2001). Impossible dreams: Reforming fisheries management in the Canadian Maritimes after the Marshall Decision. Law & Anthropology 11, 282–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicken, W. C. (2002). Mi’kmaq treaties on trial: History, land, and Donald Marshall Junior. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Aziz Choudry Dip Kapoor

Copyright information

© 2010 Aziz Choudry and Dip Kapoor

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stiegman, M., Pictou, S. (2010). How Do You Say Netuklimk in English? Using Documentary Video to Capture Bear River First Nation’s Learning through Action. In: Choudry, A., Kapoor, D. (eds) Learning from the Ground Up. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230112650_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics