Advertisement

Memorializing Mary and Elizabeth

  • Anne McLaren
Part of the Queenship and Power book series (QAP)

Abstract

Some time ago I came across the following entry posted on the Questions and Answers section of a popular Tudor History website:

I visited Westminster Abbey several years ago and was absolutely astounded at the placement of the tomb of Elizabeth I … compared to where and how the tomb of Mary Stuart was placed!! {I}t seems that James gave his mother’s tomb more precedence than Elizabeth’s, who placed him on the throne. And why were Elizabeth and Mary {Tudor} placed in the same tomb when they disliked each other? It seems like a joke played on them by James. The docet at the Abbey couldn’t give me an answer … 1

Keywords

English Nation Bodleian Library Protestant Reformation Illegitimate Status French King 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Julia M. Walker, “Reading the Tombs of Elizabeth I,” ELR, 26 (1996): 510–30.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Phillip Lindley, “ ‘The singular mediacion and praiers of all the holie companie of Heven’: Sculptural Functions and Forms in Henry VII’s Chapel” in Westminster Abbey: The Lady Chapel of Henry VII, ed. Tim Tatton-Brown and Richard Mortimer (Woodbridge: Boydell, 2003), 259–94; 273.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    A. P. Stanley, Historical Memorials of Westminster Abbey, 2 vols. (New York, 1882), Appendix: Account of the Search for the Grave of King James I, 367–403.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Jennifer Woodward, The Theatre of Death: The Ritual Management of Royal Funerals in Renaissance England, 1570–1625 (Woodbridge: Boydell, 1997), 73.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Jennifer Woodward, The Theatre of Death, ch. 4, 67–86; 85. See also Antonia Fraser, Mary Queen of Scots (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1969), 546–9.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Letter to the Dean and Chapter of Peterborough Cathedral; Dated August 28, 1612; see Nigel Llewellyn, “The Royal Body: Monuments to the Dead, for the Living” in Renaissance Bodies: The Human Figure in English Culture c. 1540–1660, ed. Lucy Gent and Nigel Llewellyn (London: Reaktion, 1990), 218–40; 227–8.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Alice Strickland, Lives of the Queens of Scotland and English Princesses Connected with the Regal Succession of Great Britain, 8 vols. (Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons, 1851), II: 445.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    For Darnley’s status see William S. Daniel, History of the Abbey and Palace of Holyrood (Edinburgh: D. Anderson, 1852), 67.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    See John Watkins, Representing Elizabeth in Stuart England: Literature, History, Sovereignty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), esp. ch. I, “James I and the Fictions of Elizabeth’s Motherhood,” 14–35.Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    Privy Purse Expenses of the Princess Mary, Daughter of King Henry the Eighth, Afterwards Queen Mary, ed. F. Madden (London: William Pickering, 1831), clxxxvii.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    John Strype, Annals of the Reformation and Establishment of Religion, and Other Various Occurrences in the Church of England, During Queen Elizabeth’s Happy Reign, 4 vols, in 7 parts (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1824) v.I.i: 400.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    Peter Sherlock, “The Monuments of Elizabeth Tudor and Mary Stuart: King James and the Manipulation of Memory,”Journal of British Studies 46 (2007): 263–89; 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 15.
    Two proclamations forbidding tomb desecration were issued, in 1560 and 1571. See David Howarth, Images of Rule: Art and Politics in the English Renaissance, 1485–1649) (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1997), 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 16.
    John Strype, Ecclesiastical Memorials Relating Chiefly to Religion and the Reformation of It, 3 vols. (London, 1721), III, 597, quoted in Jennifer Woodward, Theatre of Death, 57. See also David E. Stannard, The Puritan Way of Death: A Study in Religion, Culture and Social Change (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979), 101–2.Google Scholar
  15. 20.
    For this, and for Mary’s “hyper-sensitivity” to any hint of her illegitimacy, see E. W Ives, “Tudor Dynastic Problems Revisited,” Historical Research 81 (2008): 255–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 21.
    Anne McLaren, “Political Ideas” in Susan Doran and Norman Jones (eds.) The Elizabethan World (London: Routledge, 2010).Google Scholar
  17. 24.
    Anne McLaren, “Monogamy, Polygamy and the True State: James I’s Rhetoric of Empire,” History of Political Thought, 25 (2004): 446–80; 453–4.Google Scholar
  18. 28.
    Mark Nicholls, A History of the Modern British Isles, 1529–1603: The Two Kingdoms (London: Wiley-Blackwell, 1998), 145.Google Scholar
  19. 29.
    For an excellent treatment of Anglo-French relations and Mary of Guise’s regency, see Pamela E. Ritchie, Mary of Guise in Scotland, 1548–1560: A Political Career (East Linton: Tuckwell Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  20. 31.
    Patrick Collinson, “Puritans, Men of Business and Elizabethan Parliaments,” Parliamentary History 7 (1988): 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 36.
    Anne McLaren, “The Quest for a King: Gender, Marriage and Succession in Elizabethan England,” Journal of British Studies 41 (2002): 259–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 38.
    James Emerson Phillips, Images of a Queen: Mary Stuart in Sixteenth-Century Literature (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1964).Google Scholar
  23. 43.
    Michael A. R. Graves, Thomas Norton: The Parliament Man (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994), ix.Google Scholar
  24. 45.
    Graham Hough, The First Commentary on “The Faerie Queene” (privately printed, 1964), 8.Google Scholar
  25. 46.
    CSPVen, IX: 1592–1603, 531–48; 540. James’s fears that he would be denied the English crown on one or the other ground were long-standing. See D. H. Willson, King James VI and I (London: Jonathan Cape, 1958), 139–41.Google Scholar
  26. 47.
    Correspondence of King James VI of Scotland with Sir Robert Cecil and Others in England, During the Reign of Queen Elizabeth, ed. John Bruce (London: Camden Society, 1861), 61–2.Google Scholar
  27. 48.
    For the resulting ambiguities, see D. R. Woolf, “Two Elizabeths? James I and the Late Queen’s Famous Memory,” Canadian Journal of History 20 (1985) 167–9.Google Scholar
  28. 49.
    James I, Basilikon Doron or His Majesties Instrvctions to His Dearest Sonne, Henry the Prince (Edinburgh, 1599),Google Scholar
  29. Political Works of James I, ed. Charles Howard McIlwain (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1918), 3–52; 35.Google Scholar
  30. 53.
    See W B. Patterson, King James VI and I and the Reunion of Christendom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Anna Whitelock and Alice Hunt 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne McLaren

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations