Advertisement

To Serve the Queen

  • Robert C. Braddock
Part of the Queenship and Power book series (QAP)

Abstract

Many scholars have stressed that Mary and Elizabeth faced similar problems at their accessions: empty treasuries, hostile neighbors, religious conflict at home and abroad, not to mention a disputed claim to the throne itself. This essay adds one more topic to this list: court establishments inherited from their predecessors, whose members had loyalties and beliefs different from their own. It addresses the important but frequently overlooked aspect of the transition from the reign of each of Henry VIII’s children to the next. It shows that Mary and Elizabeth were driven by different motives when making appointments to their household establishments. For Mary past loyalty and religion were paramount, while for Elizabeth bureaucratic routine took precedence, so much so that by the end of her reign, her servants came to view their posts as a kind of property that if they could not legally sell, they could not be deprived of it without compensation.

Keywords

Privy Council Henry VIII Court Office Administrative Experience Lowly Chipper 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Jeri.L. Mcintosh, From Heads of Households to Heads of State: The Preaccession Households of Mary and Elizabeth Tudor (New York: Columbia University Press, 2008);Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. R. Elton, “Tudor Government: The Points of Contact, the Court,” TRHS, 26 (1976): 225.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    See R. C. Braddock, “The Character and Composition of the Duke of Northumberland’s Army,” Albion 6 (1974): 342–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 5.
    BL, Harleian MS 425; printed in Tudor Tracts 1532–1588, ed. A. F. Pollard (repr. New York: Cooper Square, 1967), 170–98Google Scholar
  5. Narratives of the Reformation, ed. J. G. Nichols (Camden Society, 1st series, 77, 1859), 132–48.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    H. W. Lever, “The Testament and Last Will … Earl of Oxford,” Transactions of the Essex Archaeological Society, n.s, 20 (1933), 14–16; LP, XVI: 1488 (4).Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    D. M. Loades, Intrigue and Treason: The Tudor Court, 1547–1558 (London: Pearson-Longman, 2004), 227, 254, 310.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    Jeri McIntosh, From Heads of Households; A. Whitelock and D. MacCulloch, “Princess Mary’s Household and the Succession Crisis, July 1553,” HJ, 50 (2007): 265–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 12.
    J. K. McConica, English Humanists and Reformation Politics Under Henry VIII and Edward VI (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965), 222; “Collection of Original Letters from the Bishops to the Privy Council, 1564 …,” ed. M. Bateson, Camden Miscellany 9 (Camden Society, n.s 1895), 38, 11–19.Google Scholar
  10. 16.
    For Warde and the family connexions of Household clerks, see R. C. Braddock, The Royal Household, 1540–60 (Northwestern University PhD, 1971), chapter 6.Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    TNA, E101/541/2; Allegra Woodworth, Purveyance for the Royal Household in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1945), 10.Google Scholar
  12. 21.
    G. E. Aylmer, The King’s Servants: The Civil Service of Charles I (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961), 171–2.Google Scholar
  13. 34.
    Pam Wright, “A Change in Direction: The Ramifications of a Female Household, 1558–1603,” in English Court, from the Wars of the Roses to the Civil War, ed. D. Starkey et al. (London and New York: Longman, 1987) 167.Google Scholar
  14. 51.
    Simon Adams, Leicester and the Court: Essays in Elizabethan Politics (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002), 29.Google Scholar
  15. 52.
    The House of Commons, 1558–1603, ed. P. W Hasler, 3 vols. (London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1981), I: 504.Google Scholar
  16. 57.
    A. R. Myers, The Household of Edward IV: The Black Book and the Ordinance of 1478 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1959), 181.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Anna Whitelock and Alice Hunt 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert C. Braddock

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations