Abstract
If you type the word fetish into your Internet browser, you are sure to be rewarded by a long list of hits promising photos, streaming video, and sometimes even fiction. For the naive researcher, such a list of sites might seem like a wealth of information, testament to the wide proliferation of meaning accorded the concept of fetishism within postmodernity. Yet visiting these sites is not likely to yield an encounter with the variety of fetishes favoured by contemporary theory. You will rarely find billboards, West African totems, or locks of baby hair as the subject of Web sites devoted to fetishism. Instead, what you are likely to encounter is a profusion of images associated with theatricalized S/M1 practices (whips, chains, leather boots, etc.) that posit a remarkably stable referent for the word fetish in the sexual register. If fetishism seems to enjoy increased cultural currency as a result of the World Wide Web, its connotative power is tightly bound to a vocabulary of sexualized images even narrower in scope, perhaps, than those established by Krafft-Ebing or Freud.
The roads are getting so super-paved and big and light and loaded with BIG MACS and HOWARD JOHNSONS that the only time people are forced into danger or reality is when they die. Death is the only reality we’ve got left in our nicey-nicey-clean-ice-cream-TV society so we’d better worship it. S & M sex.
—Kathy Acker, Blood and Guts in High School
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
The Munby/Cullwick relationship has been the subject of much recent scholarship owing, in part, to the late publication of their diaries. Munby bequeathed the diaries to Trinity College with the provision that they not be opened until 1950. Sections of Munby’s diary were first published in 1972 in Derek Hudson’s Munby: Man of Two Worlds: The Life and Diaries of Arthur Munby, while Cullwick’s diaries were not printed until 1984, in Liz Stanley’s The Diaries of Hannah Cullwick, Victorian Maidservant. For a detailed historical account of their relationship, see Diane Atkinson’s Love & Dirt: The Marriage of Arthur Munby & Hannah Cullwick (2003). For critical studies of the diaries, Munby’s photographs, and their import for understanding Victorian gender constructions, see Davidoff, Mavor, McClintock, and Danahay.
Copyright information
© 2010 Christopher Kocela
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kocela, C. (2010). Domesticating Fantasy: S/M Fetishism, Suburban Fiction, and Coover’s Spanking the Maid . In: Fetishism and Its Discontents in Post-1960 American Fiction. American Literature Readings in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109988_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109988_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28743-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10998-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)