Abstract
The admission of women to male universities in the nineteenth century brought with it many new debates and concerns. While the supporters of women’s higher education, in both the United States and the United Kingdom, considered all the reasons a coeducational form of instruction was ideal, they had not fully considered the applicability of such a scheme. As will be shown in this chapter, there were numerous difficulties and disagreements in mixing the male and female students in the classroom. The administrative decisions made on behalf of the student curriculum, in terms of the form that instruction took, were wide ranging. The responses of the male students to the presence of their new female classmates, and the reactions of women to their welcome also varied. At West Virginia University some of the men supported coeducation, while others were rude or impolite to their new female classmates.1 At the University of Durham the idea of having women attending lectures was seen by some of the men as a very good thing, though not for academic reasons. Writing in The Durham University Journal in 1882, an unnamed student remarked that” the presence of the fair sex would also have the great advantages of making the lectures much more attractive to the ordinary undergraduate.”2 Depending on one’s perspective and one’s confidence in his own abilities, then, it was possible to see the inclusion of women in male universities in a positive or negative light. The fact that coeducation was but one of a number of changes to the traditional university education during the nineteenth century sometimes clouds the response to it, while at other times the reaction was all too clear.3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Levis Campbell, On the Nationalisation of the Old English Universities (London: Chapman and Hall, 1901), 232.
University of London, The Calendar for the Year 1870 (London: Taylor and Francis, 1870), 444
University of London, The Calendar for the Year 1871 (London: Taylor and Francis, 1871), 465.
Susan M. Parkes and Judith Harford, “Women and Higher Education in Ireland,” in Female Education in Ireland 1700–1900: Minerva or Madonna, ed. Deirdre Kaftery and Susan M. Parkes (Dublin and Portland, OK: Irish Academic Press, 2007), 106–107
David” Woodside, The Life of Henry Calderwood, LL.D., F.P.S.E. (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1900), 233.
J. G. Fitch, “Women and the Universities,” The Contemporary Preview 58 (London: Isbister and Company, 1890), 253.
Alice Zimmern, The Renaissance of Girls’ Education in England: A Record of Fifty Years’ Progress (London: A. D. Innes & Company, 1898), 135.
Isabel Maddison, ed., Handbook of Courses Open to Women in British, Continental and Canadian Universities (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1896), 100.
Frederick O’Dwyer, The Architecture of Deane & Woodward (Cork: Cork University Press, 1997), 52–53.
Judith Harford, The Opening of University Education to Women in Ireland (Dublin and Portland, OR: Irish Academic Press, 2008), 80.
Michael Bezilla, IJenn State: An Illustrated History (University Park and London: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1985), 23.
Copyright information
© 2010 Christine D. Myers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Myers, C.D. (2010). Academic Student Life. In: University Coeducation in the Victorian Era. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109933_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109933_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38409-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10993-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)