Skip to main content
  • 33 Accesses

Abstract

Since the time of the New Deal period, the U.S. government has experimented with economic development and social welfare strategies and programs molded by liberals and conservatives and embodied in the policies and politics of both major parties. Presumably these policies provide spillover, or trickle-down, benefits that can improve the living conditions for people of color and their neighborhoods. Given continuing social and economic crisis facing relatively large sectors of blacks and Latinos in urban locations, apparently the approaches of both liberals and con-servatives have been inadequate for many people and families in these groups.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 53.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For examples and critiques of both liberal and conservative responses to social and urban issues, see the two volumes edited by James Jennings, Race, Politics, and Economic Development: Community Perspectives (London: Verso Press, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, the following essays describing black public opinion on a range of issues: Robert Smith and Richard Seltzer, Race, Class, and Culture (New York: State University of New York Press, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michael C. Dawson, Riaz Khan, and John Baughman, “Black Discontent”: The Pinal Report on the 1993–1994 National Black Politics Study, Working Paper no. 1 (Chicago: University of Chicago, Center for the Study of Race, Politics, and Culture, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martin Carnoy, Faded Dreams (London: Cambridge University Press, 1994).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Stan Faryna, Brad Stetson, and Joseph G. Conti, eds., Black and Right: The Bold New Voice of Black Conservatives in America (Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Michael C. Dawson, Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ronald W Walters and Robert C. Smith, African American Leadership (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. See, for example, Douglas S. Massey and Nancy A. Denton, American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Gerald D. Jaynes and Robin M. Williams, Jr., eds., A Common Destiny: Blacks and American Society (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wornie L. Reed, Assessment of the Status of African Americans, Vols. 1–5 (Boston: W M. Trotter Institute, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. For an overview of these various ideologies and strategic perspectives, see Howard Brotz, ed., Negro Social and Political Thought, 1850–1920 (New York: Basic Books, 1966)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Charles V Hamilton, Black Political Thought (New York: Capricorn Books, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harold Cruse, Plural, but Equal: Blacks and Minorities in America’s Plural Society (New York: Morrow and Co., 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hanes Walton, Jr., “Social Policy: The Politics of Disappearances”, Black Scholar, 27(3/4) (1997): p.73.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stephanie M. Wildman, Privilege Revealed: How Invisible Preference Undermines America (New York: New York University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vincent P Franklin, Black Self-Determination (Brooklyn: Lawrence Hill Books, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  17. John Hope Franklin and Eleanor Holmes Norton, Black Initiative and Governmental Responsibility (Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, 1987), p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Philip S. Foner and George E. Walker, eds., Proceedings of the Black State Conventions, 1840–1865, Vols. 1 and 2 (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1979–1980)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Philip S. Foner and George E. Walker, eds., Proceedings of the Black National and State Conventions, 1865–1900 (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  20. See the classic example and application of this argument as reflected in many later works by neoconservative writers in Edward C. Banfield, The Unheavenly City (Boston: Little, Brown, and Co., 1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2002 Gayle T. Tate and Lewis A. Randolph

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jennings, J. (2002). Beyond Black Neoconservatism and Black Liberalism. In: Tate, G.T., Randolph, L.A. (eds) Dimensions of Black Conservatism in the United States. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230108158_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics