Skip to main content

Foster Care

  • Chapter
  • 90 Accesses

Abstract

Victorian philanthropists did not mince words when they talked about poor kids—those kids were dangerous or perishing—that is, in danger of becoming criminals or already sunk in crime. The philanthropists formed charity schools, “Ragged Schools,” and Sunday Schools to teach these children some morals and a little reading—not enough to give them big ideas about their station in life, but enough to get them to work a little more efficiently and obediently. Boys got a little math; girls did not because they were headed for domestic work. The Sunday Schools, held on the only day when the children did not work, had a further purpose—to keep the “city Arabs” off the streets so that the respectable citizens could have a quiet Sabbath.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Charles Loring Brace, ‘The dangerous classes of New York and twenty years’ work among them. London: Wynkoop and Hallenbeck, 1872, pp. 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Linda Gordon, The Great Arizona Orphan Abduction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Linda Gordon, Heroes of their own lives: The politics and history of family violence. New York: Viking Penguin, 1988, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kathryn Edin and Laura Lein, Making ends meet. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1997, p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  5. John R. Schuerman, Tina L. Rzepnicki, and Julia H. Littell, Putting families first. New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jeffrey L. Edleson, “Defining child exposure to domestic violence as neglect: Minnesota’s difficult experience,” Social Work,vol. 51, no. 2, April 2006, pp. 167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Joseph H. Reid, “Pattern of Partnership” mimeographed, NY: Child Welfare League of America, 1969, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nina Bernstein, The lost chiliren of wilier, New York: Pantheon, 2001, p. 187

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paul Chill, “Burden of Proof Begone: The Pernicious Effect of Emergency Removal in Child Protective Proceedings,” University of Connecticut School of Law rticles and Working Papers. Paper 55, July 2004.http://lsr.nellco.org/uconn_wps/55 Accessed 2/1/31.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richard Wexler, Don’t turn back. Alexandria, VA: National Coalition for Child Protection Reform, January 18, 2006, p. 7

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Ashby, Endangered children. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  12. W I. Trattner, From poor law to welfare state (6th ed.), 1999, pp. 84–85.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Eckenrode, J. Doris, J. Munsch, and N. Bolger, “Substantiation of Child Abuse and Neglect Reports,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology wo\. 56 No. 1 (1988): 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Daniel R. Neupiel and Terry Martin Zingman, “Custody of cocaine-exposed newborns: Determinants of discharge decisions,” American Journal of Public Health vol. 83 (1993): 1726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mary Ann Jones, Parental lack of supervision: Nature and consequences of a major child neglect problem. Washington: Child Welfare League of America, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jed Metzger, “Resiliency in children and youth in kinship care and family foster care,” Child Welfare, vol. 87, no. 6, 2008, pp. 115–140.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leroy H. Pelton, “Informing child welfare: The promise and limits of empirical research,” in Child Welfare Research, edited by Duncan Lindsey and Aron Shlonsky, New York: Oxford University, 2007, pp. 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zeinab Chahine, Justine van Straaten, and Anne Williams Tsom, “The New York City neighborhood-bases services strategy,” Child Welfare, vol. LXXXIV, no. 2, March/April 2005, p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cynthia Andrews Scarcella, Roseanna Bess, Erica H. Zielewski, Lindsay Warner, and Rob Geen, The cost of protecting vulnerable children. Washington DC, The Urban Institute, December 20, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  20. David Gil, “The political and economic context of child abuse,” in Unhappy families: Clinical ani research perspectives on family violence, edited by Eli H. Newberger and Richard Bourne. Littleton, MA: PSG Publishing, 1985, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kurt Vonnegut, Timeąuake. New York: Berkley Books, 1997, p. 200. Original emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Betty Reid Mandell

Copyright information

© 2010 Betty Reid Mandell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mandell, B.R. (2010). Foster Care. In: Mandell, B.R. (eds) The Crisis of Caregiving. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107847_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics