Abstract
Everyone knows that different political cultures affect democratization in different ways. Yet, merely to state this raises complex issues of interpretation and meaning that we all struggle to grasp. For instance, regardless of type, regimes seek legitimacy for their authority and leadership. An authority and leadership that for Max Weber ([1924] 1962) fell into three archetypes, traditional, emotional, or rational-legal, and in reality, it is usually some mixture of all three. In Gramscian terms, however, this search for legitimacy involves nothing as obvious as direct coercion. Rather, it relies on an enmeshment of coercion and consent. A reciprocity between the former and latter facilitates the reproduction of a hegemonic form of political domination. As complicity is elicited through an ensemble of material, ideational, and discursive practices and strategies that order and sustain the configuration of power. Under the pervasive influence of a hegemonic bloc, the general populace internalize the ideas, values, and norms of the dominant social grouping thus legitimizing their rule by accepting as normal the formation of authority and l eadership (Gramsci 1971: 57).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2010 Paul J. Carnegie
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carnegie, P.J. (2010). Democratization and Politik Aliran . In: The Road from Authoritarianism to Democratization in Indonesia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107748_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107748_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28675-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10774-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)