Skip to main content
  • 81 Accesses

Abstract

Do greatly increased flows of people, goods, and money across borders undermine ethnic identities or reinforce them? Has intensified interaction between diverse peoples made them more similar or more different? International changes in the last few decades have raised these questions about the relationship between globalization and ethnicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. According to Do Hungryol’s research on Korean Chinese in 1992, 58.4 percent of them said that they regarded South Korea as their mother country while 8.3 percent answered North Korea. Approximately 21.1 percent of them stated that the reason was the economic wealth of South Korea (1992, 182–183). According to another source, Korean Chinese even said that between the two Koreas, the “wealthy one” is their motherland (Kwon Tai-Hwan and Han Sang-Bok 1993, 100).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Melissa Brown emphasizes that intermarriage is a primary means for cultural change. She writes, “Intermarriage between Chinese and non-Chinese is an important means both for introducing cultural change toward (and of) Chinese models and for claiming Chinese identity” (1996, 68). She continues, “I consider the process of ‘becoming Chinese’ at the level of individuals, where interaction with ‘society’ occurs. … At this level, cultural change is a process; boundaries for identification are neither clear nor always important and are frequently opportunistically employed; here ‘becoming Chinese’ is best seen in retrospect” (43).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Hyejin Kim

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, H. (2010). Introduction. In: International Ethnic Networks and Intra-Ethnic Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107724_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics