Abstract
Without understanding the nature and structure of inter-Korea competition, the relationship between the divided halves on the Korean peninsula, including the prospect of unification, cannot be properly comprehended. This relationship is predicated upon the premise that both systems cannot be simultaneously legitimate (one of the systems must be illegitimate and, therefore, disintegrated). The historical climate peculiar to the evolution of inter-Korea relations is unique. Each system has developed a political culture that contrasts with and often contradicts that of the other. As political institutions, domestic policy behavior, and foreign policy postures are all founded on the norms and values that constitute the foundation of regime legitimacy. The understanding of the political culture involving system legitimacy is particularly crucial in explaining and forecasting system characteristics and behaviors of the two Korean systems. By limiting analysis to the study of leadership characters or international contextual factors, even the most informed observers have consistently been puzzled by the unconventional nature of inter-Korea dynamics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
On the basis of legitimacy along this line, John Schaar makes an analytical discussion in his book, Legitimacy in the Modern States (New Brunswick. NJ: Transaction Books, 1981).
Han Shik Park and Kyung Ae Park, China and North Korea: Politics and Integration and Modernization (Hong Kong: Asia Research Service, 1990)
On the origins and detailed account of the Korean War, see Bruce Cumings, The Origins of the Korean War, volumes I and 2 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981 and 1990)
The evolution of democracy in South Korea is carefully examined by John Ki-chiang Oh. See his Korea: Democracy on Trial (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1968)
For an extensive discussion on this process, see Dae-Sook Suh, The Korean Communist Movement, 1918–1948 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967)
Chongsik Lee and Robert Scalapino, Communism in Korea, 2 volumes (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1972).
On September 5, 1952, during the Korean War, the Chinese government granted the Northeast region, heavily populated by ethnic Koreans, the status of “autonomous region.” This policy action was generally regarded as a reward for the contribution that the Koreans in China made to the Chinese involvement in the Korean conflict. See Ma Nin, ed., Jungkuk sosuminjok sangsik (The Chinese Minority Nationalities) (Beijing: Nationalities Publication House, 1983).
For a concise and credible discussion on the leadership crisis and economic difficulties in this period, see John Kie-chiang Oh, Korean Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999)
On the evolution of Juche, see Han S. Park, “The Nature and Evolution of Juche” in Han S. Park, ed., North Korea: ideology, Politics, Economy (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Publishers, 1996).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2001 Kyung-Ae Park and Dalchoong Kim
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Park, H.S. (2001). The Nature and Evolution of the Inter-Korean Legitimacy War. In: Park, KA., Kim, D. (eds) Korean Security Dynamics in Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107465_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107465_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38661-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10746-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)