Abstract
Much recent criticism of the reformist and dissenting politics of the 1790s has stressed the fact that radical writers attempted to manufacture a transparent prose style in which to propagate political ideas.1 It is generally argued that this was in reaction against Edmund Burke’s use of a rhetoric of the sublime and his appropriation of the mode of sensibility (the latter until then a discourse associated with progressive and reformist ideas).2 Writers such as Thomas Paine, Mary Wollstonecraft, and William Cobbett eschewed the highly rhetorical and emotive style of Burke’s writing, preferring a rational discourse where a plain style was utilized to bring about as close as possible a correspondence between words and things. Of course, as many have pointed out, all language is metaphorical and Paine’s and Wollstonecraft’s own political writing was heavily rhetorical, although in a way that attempted to disguise its own metaphoricky.3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Zera S. Fink, “Wordsworth and the English Republican Tradition,” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 4 (1948), 107–26
Peter J. Kitson “Coleridge, Milton and the Millennium,” The Wordsworth Circle, 17 (1987), 61–66
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Tim Fulford
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kitson, P.J. (2002). “To Milton’s Trump”: Coleridge’s Unitarian Sublime and the Miltonic Apocalypse. In: Fulford, T. (eds) Romanticism and Millenarianism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107205_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107205_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38717-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10720-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)