Skip to main content

Abstract

In popular culture today, representations of Elizabeth I tend to oscillate around a central and gendered duality On the one hand, they visually reference the “Gloriana” of her most frequently reproduced portraits: the image of royal authority in the tradition of kings, splendidly and powerfully arrayed; and on the other, they supply romantic and sexual narratives that attempt to explain Elizabeth’s identity as an unmarried woman.1 The interplay between these two perspectives in popular film versions of Elizabeth creates a fractured portrait of female authority: masculine regality in some degree of conflict with feminine emotionality. Rather than functioning, as some critics have suggested, as a “quasi-feminist heroine” or a “feminist icon,” twentieth- and twenty-first-century representations of Elizabeth increasingly present her as defined and circumscribed by her relation to men.2 Perhaps this is why discussions about Elizabeth almost always include a debate on the question of her virginity—in spite of the fact that the debate will never be resolved. The myth of the Virgin Queen continues to tantalize modern imaginations, begging for an explanation of the Queen as a woman. The continuing abundance of fictional representations of the Queen and her family in literature and on film testifies to the persistent interest in the secret lives of the Tudors.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The work of Francis Yates and Roy Strong established the idea of a “cult of virginity” constructed through portraiture and pageantry. See Yates, Astraea: The Imperial Theme in the Sixteenth Century (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roy Strong, The Cult of Elizabeth: Elizabethan Portraiture and Pageantry (London: Thames & Hudson, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  3. The concept I borrow here is outlined by Michel DeCerteau in The Writing of History, trans. Tom Conley (New York: Columbia UP, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Louis Montrose, “Idols of the Queen”, Representations 68 (1999): 50–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Philippa Berry, Of Chastity and Power (New York: Routledge, 1989).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. See Susan Frye, Elizabeth I: The Competition for Representation (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elizabeth I: Collected Works, ed. Leah Marcus, Janel Mueller, and Mary Beth Rose (Chicago: Chicago UP, 2000), 97.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barbara Hodgdon, The Shakespeare Trade: Performances and Appropriations (Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Dissing Elizabeth: Negative Representations of Gloriana, ed. Julia M. Walker (Durham: Duke UP, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  10. English Recusant Literature 1558–1640, ed. D.M. Rogers, vol. 74 (New York: Scholar Press, 1971), xi.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carole Levin, “Gender, Monarchy, and the Power of Seditious Words”, in Dissing Elizabeth: Negative Representations of Gloriana, ed. Julia M. Walker (Durham: Duke UP, 1998), 77–95

    Google Scholar 

  12. David Grant Moss argues that “The Ditchley portrait has in effect become the standard image of her in popular culture.” See “A Queen for Whose Time?”, The Journal of Popular Culture 39.5 (2006): 796.

    Google Scholar 

  13. This position is taken by Thomas Betteridge in “A Queen for All Seasons”, in The Myth of Elizabeth, ed. Susan Doran and Thomas Freeman (New York: Palgrave, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Renee Pigeon in “‘No Man’s Elizabeth’: The Virgin Queen in Recent Films”, in Retrovisions, ed. Deborah Cartmell, I.Q. Hunter, and Imelda Whelehan (London: Pluto Press 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  15. In the 1581 court entertainment, “The Four Foster Children of Desire” (attributed to Philip Sidney), the queen residing in “the Fortress of Perfect Beauty” is besieged by four men, who are characterized as “driven to see the furie of Desire” (71). Here, courtiers stage a sexual assault to display England’s power before the French ambassadors. See Jean Wilson, Entertainments for Elizabeth I (Woodbridge, England: Rowman & Littlefield, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  16. On the ideology of the queen’s two bodies, see Marie Axton, The Queen’s Two Bodies: Drama and the Elizabethan Succession, Studies in Fiction 5 (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Greg Colón Semenza

Copyright information

© 2010 Greg Colón Semenza

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eastwood, A.L. (2010). The Secret Life of Elizabeth I. In: Semenza, G.C. (eds) The English Renaissance in Popular Culture. Reproducing Shakespeare: New Studies in Adaptation and Appropriation. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230106444_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics