Abstract
In popular culture today, representations of Elizabeth I tend to oscillate around a central and gendered duality On the one hand, they visually reference the “Gloriana” of her most frequently reproduced portraits: the image of royal authority in the tradition of kings, splendidly and powerfully arrayed; and on the other, they supply romantic and sexual narratives that attempt to explain Elizabeth’s identity as an unmarried woman.1 The interplay between these two perspectives in popular film versions of Elizabeth creates a fractured portrait of female authority: masculine regality in some degree of conflict with feminine emotionality. Rather than functioning, as some critics have suggested, as a “quasi-feminist heroine” or a “feminist icon,” twentieth- and twenty-first-century representations of Elizabeth increasingly present her as defined and circumscribed by her relation to men.2 Perhaps this is why discussions about Elizabeth almost always include a debate on the question of her virginity—in spite of the fact that the debate will never be resolved. The myth of the Virgin Queen continues to tantalize modern imaginations, begging for an explanation of the Queen as a woman. The continuing abundance of fictional representations of the Queen and her family in literature and on film testifies to the persistent interest in the secret lives of the Tudors.3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
The work of Francis Yates and Roy Strong established the idea of a “cult of virginity” constructed through portraiture and pageantry. See Yates, Astraea: The Imperial Theme in the Sixteenth Century (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977)
Roy Strong, The Cult of Elizabeth: Elizabethan Portraiture and Pageantry (London: Thames & Hudson, 1977)
The concept I borrow here is outlined by Michel DeCerteau in The Writing of History, trans. Tom Conley (New York: Columbia UP, 1988).
Louis Montrose, “Idols of the Queen”, Representations 68 (1999): 50–101.
Philippa Berry, Of Chastity and Power (New York: Routledge, 1989).
See Susan Frye, Elizabeth I: The Competition for Representation (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1993).
Elizabeth I: Collected Works, ed. Leah Marcus, Janel Mueller, and Mary Beth Rose (Chicago: Chicago UP, 2000), 97.
Barbara Hodgdon, The Shakespeare Trade: Performances and Appropriations (Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1998).
See Dissing Elizabeth: Negative Representations of Gloriana, ed. Julia M. Walker (Durham: Duke UP, 1998).
English Recusant Literature 1558–1640, ed. D.M. Rogers, vol. 74 (New York: Scholar Press, 1971), xi.
Carole Levin, “Gender, Monarchy, and the Power of Seditious Words”, in Dissing Elizabeth: Negative Representations of Gloriana, ed. Julia M. Walker (Durham: Duke UP, 1998), 77–95
David Grant Moss argues that “The Ditchley portrait has in effect become the standard image of her in popular culture.” See “A Queen for Whose Time?”, The Journal of Popular Culture 39.5 (2006): 796.
This position is taken by Thomas Betteridge in “A Queen for All Seasons”, in The Myth of Elizabeth, ed. Susan Doran and Thomas Freeman (New York: Palgrave, 2003)
Renee Pigeon in “‘No Man’s Elizabeth’: The Virgin Queen in Recent Films”, in Retrovisions, ed. Deborah Cartmell, I.Q. Hunter, and Imelda Whelehan (London: Pluto Press 2001).
In the 1581 court entertainment, “The Four Foster Children of Desire” (attributed to Philip Sidney), the queen residing in “the Fortress of Perfect Beauty” is besieged by four men, who are characterized as “driven to see the furie of Desire” (71). Here, courtiers stage a sexual assault to display England’s power before the French ambassadors. See Jean Wilson, Entertainments for Elizabeth I (Woodbridge, England: Rowman & Littlefield, 1980).
On the ideology of the queen’s two bodies, see Marie Axton, The Queen’s Two Bodies: Drama and the Elizabethan Succession, Studies in Fiction 5 (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1977).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2010 Greg Colón Semenza
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eastwood, A.L. (2010). The Secret Life of Elizabeth I. In: Semenza, G.C. (eds) The English Renaissance in Popular Culture. Reproducing Shakespeare: New Studies in Adaptation and Appropriation. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230106444_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230106444_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28648-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10644-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)