Skip to main content

Neoliberalism and the Dynamics of Capitalist Development in Latin America

  • Chapter
Globalization in the 21st Century

Abstract

An analysis of the dynamics of capitalist development over the past two decades has been overshadowed by an all too prevalent “globalization” discourse. It appears that much of the Left has bought into this discourse, tacitly accepting globalization as an irresistible fact and that in many ways it is progressive, needing only for the corporate agenda to be derailed and an abandonment of neoliberalism. This is certainly the case in Latin America where the Left has focused its concern almost exclusively on the bankruptcy of “neoliberalism,” with reference to the agenda pursued and package of policy reforms implemented by virtually every government in the region by the dint of ideology if not the demands of global capital or political opportunism. In this concern, imperialism and capitalism per se, as opposed to neoliberalism, have been pushed off the agenda, and as a result, except for Chavez’s Bolivarian Revolution the project of building socialism has virtually disappeared as an object of theory and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abers, Rebecca. 1997. Inventing Local Democracy: Neighborhood Organizing and Participatory Policy-Making in Porto Alegre, Brazil-Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Urban Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alier, Max and Benedict Clements. 2007. “Comments on Fiscal Policy Reform in Latin America,” Paper prepared for the Copenhagen Consensus for Latin America and the Caribbean—Consulta de San José, Costa Rica, October 20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Aznar, José Maria. 2007. America Latina. Una agenda de libertad. Madrid: Fundacion para el Anâlisis y los Estudios Sociales (FAES).

    Google Scholar 

  • Besayag, Miguel y Diego Sztulwark. 2000. Politica y situaciôn: de la potencia wl contrapoder. Buenos Aires: Ed. De Mano en Mano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, H. 1997. Democratic Local Governance in Bolivia. CDIE Impact Evaluation, No. 3. Washington, DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, David. 1996. “Popular Participation, Democracy, the State in Rural Bolivia,” Dept. of Anthropology, Stockholm University. La Paz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer-Thomas, Victor. 1996. The New Economie Model in Latin America and its Impact on Income Distribution and Poverty. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbach, Roger. 1994. “Roots of the Postmodern Rebellion in Chiapas,” New Left Review, 1, 205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casteneda, J. G. 1994. Utopia Unarmed: The Latin American Left After the Cold War. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilcote, R. H. 1990. “Post-Marxism. The Retreat from Class in Latin America,” Latin American Perspectives 65, 17, Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, Benedict. Christopher Faircloth and Marijn Verhoeven. 2007. “Public Expenditure in Latin America: Trends and Key Policy Issues,” IMF Working Paper WP/07/21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colectivo Situaciones. 2001. Contrapoder: una introducciôn. Buenos Aires: Ediciones de Mano en Mano, Noviembre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, Benedict. 2002. 19 y 20: Apuntes para el nuevo protagonismo social. Buenos Aires: Editorial De mano en Mano, Abril.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONAIE. 1994. Proyecto politico de la CONAIE. Quito.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONAIE—Confederacion de Nacionalidades Indïgenas de Ecuador. 2003. Mandata de la I Cumbre de las Nacionalidades, Pueblos y Autoridades Alternativas. Quito: CONAIE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B. and U. Kothari, eds., 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny London and New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, John. 2003. “The Impact of Neo-Liberal Economics on Peruvian Peasant Agriculture in the 1990s,” in Tom Brass, ed., Latin American Peasants, 131–161. London: Frank

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, D. and Porter, D. 2006. Development BeyondNeoliberalism? Governance, Poverty Reduction and Political Economy. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. and Pizzorno, A. 1978. Resurgence of Class Conflict in Western Europe Since 1968. London: Holmes & Meier.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cypher, James M. 2007. “Back to the 19th Century? The Current Commodities Boom and the Primarization Process in Latin America,” Presented to the LASA XXVII International Congress Session ECO20, Montreal, Canada, September 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dâvalos, Pablo. 2004. “Movimiento indïgena, democracia, Estado y plurinacio-nalidad en Ecuador,” Revista Venezolana de Economia y Ciencias Sociales 10, 1, Enero-Abril.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Mike. 1984. “The Political Economy of late-Imperial America,” New Left Review, 143, January-February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Mike. 2006. Planet of Slums. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Castro Silva, Claudete y Tania Margarete Keinart. 1996. “Globalizacion, Estado nacional e instancias locales de poder en America Latina,” Nueva Sociedad, 142, Abil-Mayo.

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Fuente, Manuel, ed. 2001. Participaciôn popular y desarrollo local, Cochabamba: PROMEC-CEPLAG-CESU.

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Garza, Enrique. 1994. “Los sindicatos en America Latina frente a la estruc-turacion productiva y los ajustes neoliberales,” El Cotidiano, No. 64, 9–10, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Wise, Raul. 2006. “Migration and Imperialism: The Mexican Workforce in the Context of NAFTA,” Latin American Perspectives, 33 (2): 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez, J. and A. Lowenthal, eds. 1996. Constructing Democratic Governance. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC—Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. 1990. Productive Trans formation with Equity. Santiago, Chile: ECLAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faux, Jeffrey. 2006. The Class War. Washington DC: Economic Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, John. 2002. Change The World Without Taking Power: The Meaning of Revolution Today. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, John and Eloina Pelâez, eds. 1998. Zapatista! Reinventing Revolution in Mexico. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Kari. 2003. “Grounding the Globalization Debate in Political Economy,” Notes for a Contribution Toward the publication of Globalization and Anti-Globalization. Halifax: Saint Mary’s University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievesley, Géraldine. 2005. “The Latin American Left: The Difficult Relationship between Electoral Ambition and Popular Empowerment,” Contemporary Politics 11, 1, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macas, Luis. 2000. “Movimiento indigena ecuatoriano: Una evaluacion nece-saria,” Boletin ICCI “RIMAY” Ano 3, 21, diciembre, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macas, Luis. 2004. “El movimiento Indigena: Aproximaciones a la comprension del desarrollo ideologico politico,” Tendencia Revista Ideologico Politico, I, Quito, Marzo, 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcos, Subcomadante. 1994. “Tourist Guide to Chiapas,” Monthly Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Liisa and John Cameron, eds. 2003. Rural Progress, Rural Decay: Neoliberal Adjustment Policies and Local Initiatives. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo, A. 2004. “Social Capital and the Development Agenda,” in Atria, R. ed., Social Capital and Poverty Reduction in Latin America and the Caribbean: Towards a New Paradigm, 25–32. Santiago: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo, José Antonio. 1998. “Beyond the Washington Consensus: An ECLAC Perspective,” CEPAL Review 66, December: 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo, A. 2007. “The Macroeconomics of the Latin American Economic Boom,” CEPAL Review 93, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD—Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development. 1997. Final Report of the DAC Ad Hoc Working Group on Participatory Development and Good Governance. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras, James. 1997a. “The Resurgence of the Left,” New Left Review, 223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras, James. 1997b. “MST and Latin America: The Revival of the Peasantry as a Revolutionary Force,” Canadian Dimension 31, 3, May/June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras, James. 2001. “Are Latin American Peasant Movements Still a Force for Change? Some New Paradigms revisited,” The Journal of Peasant Studies 28, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras, James. 2006. “Following the Profits and Escaping the Debts: International Immigration and Imperial-Centered Accumulation.” Dissident Voice, August 8 http://dissidentvoice.org/Aug06/Petras08.htm.

  • Petras, James. 2007. “Global Ruling Class: Billionaires and How They ‘Made It,’” Global Research, March 23 [www.globalresearch.ca]

  • Petras, James and Henry Veltmeyer. 2005. Social Movements and the State: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras, James. 2009. What’s Left in Latin America. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. 1998. “Social Capital: its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology,” Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. 2000. “Social Capital: Promise and Pitfalls of its Role in Development,” Journal of Latin American Studies, 32: 529–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salbuchi, Adrian. 2000. El cerebro del mundo: la car a oculta de la globalizacion Ath. ed., Cordoba, Argentina: Ediciones del Copista.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltos Galarza, Napoleon. 2006. “La derrota del poder economico y la emergen-cia del poder constituyente,” Quito, December 1. wnsaltosg@yahoo.es.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, Rolando, ed. 2003. Desarrollo pensado desde los municipios: capital social y despliegue de potencialidades local. La Paz: PIED—Programa de Investigacion Estratégia en Bolivia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe-Fernândez, John and Omar Nunez. 2001. “Globalizacion e Imperialismo: La transferencia de Excedentes de America Latina,” in J. Saxe-Fernândez, J. Petras, H. Veltmeyer, and O. Nunez, eds, Globalizacion, Imperialismo y Clase Social, Buenos Aires: Editorial Lumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedile, Joao Pedro. 2000. Interview with James Petras, May 14. Terceros, Walter and Jonny Zambrana Barrios. 2002. Experiencias de los con-sejos de participaciôn popular (CPPs). Cochabamba: PROSANA, Unidad de fortalecimiento comunitario y transversales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toothaker, Christopher. 2007. “Chavez Cites Plan for ‘Collective Property,’” Associated Press, Posted March 27. http://www.sun-sentinel.com/business/ reaies ta te/sfl-achavez27mar.

  • UNDP. 1996. “Good Governance and Sustainable Human Development,” Governance Policy Taper, http://magnet.undp.org/policy.

  • UNICEF. 1989. Participaciôn de los sectores pobres en programas de desarrollo local. Santiago, Chile: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Waeyenberge, Elisa. 2006. “From Washington to Post-Was hington Consensus,” in Jomo, K. S. and Ben Fine, eds., The New Development Economics. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrot, Mark. 2009. “The Chavez Administration at 10 Years: The Economy and Social Indicators,” The Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), Washington DC, February 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 1994a. The World Bank and Tarticipation. Washington DC: World Bank, Operations Policy Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrot, Mark. 1994b. Governance. The World Bank Experience. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Berch Berberoglu

Copyright information

© 2010 Berch Berberoglu

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Petras, J., Veitmeyer, H. (2010). Neoliberalism and the Dynamics of Capitalist Development in Latin America. In: Berberoglu, B. (eds) Globalization in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230106390_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics