Skip to main content
  • 104 Accesses

Abstract

The general purpose of this book was to evaluate whether the increasing success of the online political debates, which we defined as the virtualization of political debates, can favor the emergence of a more deliberative democratic process or, on the opposite side, whether this phenomenon has no impact or a negative impact on the deliberative-ness of our democracies. The present work has attempted to evaluate the deliberative potential of the online political debates through three interconnected research questions. The first is related to the diffusion of the online debates by observing how widespread the phenomenon is and who the users of the online debates are; the second looks at the offer of the online debates, by analyzing which are the political actors (civil society, media, institutional actors) that are more inclined to host the online political debates; and the third concerns the deliberativeness of the online debates by defining the methods that should be applied for measuring this deliberativeness and by identifying the factors that favor the participative success and deliberativeness of the debates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

Ā© 2010 RaphaĆ«l Kies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kies, R. (2010). Conclusion. In: Promises and Limits of Web-Deliberation. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230106376_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics