Abstract
The early modern universities of Oxford and Cambridge might be imagined as hermetically sealed bastions of learning and piety, because of their historical role as training grounds for clergy. However, this pastoral image runs aground on the fact that scholars actively participated in urban pastimes—and with growing populations, notable increases in building activity, active city councils, and thriving craft guilds, as well as crime and poverty, late sixteenth-century Oxford and Cambridge certainly offered an urban experience, if on a smaller scale than that of London.1 Noting the regularity with which historians separate the university from its urban environs, Victor Morgan argues that the two should be examined in relation to each other and to the larger spheres of which they are a part:
There is, perhaps, a temptation to conceive the relationship between a university and its urban context simply as bipartite…. I suspect that the relationship is rarely as simple as this. To borrow a phrase of the anthropologists, universities and their urban environs are almost always “part societies,” and the relationship between these two particular constituent elements can only be fully understood within the larger context.2
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Peter Clark, The English Alehouse: A Social History, 1200–1830 (New York: Longman, 1983), 109.
See Susan Dwyer Amussen, “The Gendering of Popular Culture in Early Modern England,” in Popular Culture in England, c. 1500–1800, ed. Tim Harris (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995), 48–68
Paul Griffiths, Youth and Authority: Formative Experiences in England (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), 232.
Christopher Hill, “Appendix—a Note on the Universities,” Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution (Oxford: Clarendon, 1965), 301–14
See Mark Curtis, “The Alienated Intellectuals of Early Stuart England,” Past and Present 23 (1962): 25–43
J. B. Leishman details the resemblances to Nashe in the introduction to his edition, The Three Parnassus Plays (London: Ivor Nicholson & Watson, 1949), 71–79.
Frederick S. Boas, University Drama in the Tudor Age (New York: Benjamin Blom, 1914), 343–44.
Philip Stubbes, The Anatomie of Abuses, ed. Margaret Jane Kidnie (Tempe, AZ: Renaissance English Text Society, 2002), 204.
For these authors’ roles in cultivating the literary grotesque in late Tudor London, see Neil Rhodes’s Elizabethan Grotesque (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul), 1980.
Lawrence Manley, Literature and Culture in Early Modern London (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 300.
Lorna Hutson, Thomas Nashe in Context (Oxford: Clarendon, 1989), 172.
G. R. Hibbard, Thomas Nashe: A Critical Introduction (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962), 78.
Peter Holbrook, Literature and Degree in Renaissance England: Nashe, Bourgeois Tragedy, Shakespeare (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1994), 65.
For a reading of the play as an anti-Puritan affirmation of festivity, see Stephen S. Hillard’s The Singularity of Thomas Nashe (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1986), 48–61.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2010 Amanda Bailey and Roze Hentschell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ellinghausen, L. (2010). University of Vice: Drink, Gentility, and Masculinity in Oxford, Cambridge, and London. In: Bailey, A., Hentschell, R. (eds) Masculinity and the Metropolis of Vice, 1550–1650. Early Modern Cultural Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230106147_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230106147_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38499-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10614-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)