Advertisement

Money isn’t Everything: Concubinage, Class, and the Rise and Fall of Sibil·la de Fortià, Queen of Aragon (1377–87)

Chapter
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)

Abstract

Sibil-la de Fortià became queen of the Crown of Aragon upon her marriage to Pere the Ceremonious (r. 1337–87) in 1377. The fifty-eight-year-old king ruled one of the most powerful kingdoms of the Western Mediterranean, an aggregate that spanned the principality of Catalonia, and the Kingdoms of Aragon, Valencia and Mallorca, Corsica, Sardinia, and the Duchies of Athens and Neopatria. Sibil·la was a Catalan, a member of the lower nobility, who married Pere after having been his concubine for some time and having given him a daughter, Isabel. She was remarkable because typically, a queen should have been a woman of royal lineage or of the highest nobility whose family could provide a considerable dowry and with whom a marriage alliance would offer political advantages. Women of such families tended to be raised with the aim of marrying them well; it was important that they be cultivated, sophisticated and of virtuous repute. They were frequently betrothed as infants, and married off soon after puberty.1 Sibil·la, thus, represents one of the few examples of an illiterate member of the lower nobility who ascended to the rank of queen after having served her future husband openly as a concubine. This chapter examines Sibil·la’s trajectory from concubine to queen, the opportunities and challenges that her rank and status presented her with, and the resistance she faced from the established elite.

Keywords

Royal Family Real Academia Royal Court Extrajudicial Killing Future Husband 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For historical context, see Thomas N. Bisson, The Medieval Crown of Aragon: A Short History (Oxford: Clarendon, 1986);Google Scholar
  2. J. N. Hillgarth, The Spanish Kingdoms, 1250–1516, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976–78); andGoogle Scholar
  3. Ramón Menéndez Pidal, ed. Historia de España, 42 vols. (Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, 2005). Abbreviations used in this article include ACA (Arxiu de la Corona d’Aragó), CSIC (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas), and RP (Reial Patrimoni).Google Scholar
  4. 1.
    Between 1256 and 1266 Alfonso X, King of Castile (r. 1252–84) compiled a legal code known as “The Seven Parts” (Las siete partidas). The section of the treatise that relates to queen outlines four characteristics a queen must possess—good lineage, beauty, good education, and wealth—and specified that good behavior and noble lineage were most important. [Las siete partidas del rey Don Alfonso el Sabio (Madrid: Real Academia de la Historia, 1972), 3 vols., vol. II, Partida 2,6,1, pp. 41–42.] See John C. Parsons, “Family, Sex, and Power: The Rhythms of Medieval Queenship,” in Medieval Queenship, ed. John C. Parsons (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  5. 2.
    Josep Maria Roca, “La Reyna empordanesa,” Memorias de la Real Academia de Buenas Letras de Barcelona 10 (1928): 9–212, p. 14. Roca includes an extensive appendix of edited documents.Google Scholar
  6. See also Alberto Boscolo, La Reina Sibil-la de Fortià (Barcelona: Rafael Dalmau, 1971), p. 17.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    Andrés Ivars, “La ‘indiferencia’ de Pedro IV de Aragón en el Gran Cisma de Occidente (1378–1382),” Archivo Ibero Americano 29 (1921): 21–97.Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    Thomas Kuehn, Illegitimacy in Renaissance Florence (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2005), p. 8.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    Lois Huneycutt, “Intercession and the High-Medieval Queen: The Esther Topos,” in Power of the Weak, ed. Jennifer Carpenter and Sally-Beth MacLean (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1995), pp.126–46;Google Scholar
  10. Janet Nelson, “Medieval Queenship,” in Women in Medieval Western European Culture, ed. Linda E. Mitchell (New York: Garland, 1999), pp. 179–207, esp. p.186.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    The Church did not permit divorce, but recognized that a marriage could be annulled in certain circumstances such as impotence, lack of physical consummation, and consanguinity. The notion of equality of men and women in marriage was a fiction, especially concerning expectations regarding chastity, fidelity, and sexual continence. See D. L. D’Avray, Medieval Marriage: Symbolism and Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christopher Brooke, The Medieval Idea of Marriage (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), pp. 130–42.Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    Pauline Stafford, Queens, Concubines and Dowagers: The King’s Wife in the Early Middle Ages (London: Leicester University Press, 1998), pp. 62–63.Google Scholar
  14. 18.
    María Jesús Fuente, Reinas medievales en los reinos hispánicos (Madrid: La esfera de los libros, 2003), pp. 272–95.Google Scholar
  15. 19.
    In 1410 Martí I, second son of Pere the Ceremonious, died without a surviving legitimate heir. In 1412 in a verdict known as the “compromise of Caspe,” a council gave the throne to Fernando I de Antequera, a member of the Trastámara dynasty of Castile and son of Juan I of Castile and Elionor of Aragon, and therefore grandson of Pere the Ceremonious. Jaume Vicens Vives, Els Trastàmares (Barcelona: Editorial Teide, 1956), pp. 78–85.Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    Marriages for love were very rare among the royalty and the nobility in the Middle Ages. The best-known example is Eleanor of Aquitaine who chose to marry Henry, Duke of Normandy and later King of England, in 1152, motivated partly by personal affection. It was a marriage that had rather serious “issues” (see above, n. 17). Elizabeth Brown, “Eleanor of Aquitaine Reconsidered: The Woman and her Seasons,” in Eleanor of Aquitaine. Lord and Lady, ed. Bonnie Wheeler and John C. Parsons (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
  17. 23.
    After Sibil-la only two other queens received formal coronations: Maria de Luna (1399) and Elionor de Albuquerque (1414). Jaume Riera Sans, “La coronadó de la reina Elionor (1352),” Acta Mediaevalia 26 (2005): 485–92, esp. p.485.Google Scholar
  18. 24.
    In his memoir of 1347 he remarked that it seemed “by the will of God, We will have only daughters […]” Pere III el Cerimoniós, ed. Crònica, A. Cortadellas (Barcelona: Edicions 62, 1995), p. 178.Google Scholar
  19. 25.
    Josep Maria Roca, “Johan I d’Aragó,” Memorias de la Real Academia de Buenas Letras de Barcelona, 11 vols (Barcelona: Institució Patxot, 1929), pp. 432–34, doc. XI; Boscolo, La reina, pp. 58–60.Google Scholar
  20. 26.
    Pedro Garcés de Cariñena, Nobiliario de Aragón, anotado por Zurita, Blancas y otros autores, M. I. Ubieto Artur, ed. (Zaragoza: Anubar, 1983), p. 262;Google Scholar
  21. Jerónimo Zurita, Anales de la Corona de Aragón (Zaragoza: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 1978), IV: 670 [X:XXIX];Google Scholar
  22. Esteban Sarasa Sánchez, Sociedad y conflictos sociales en Aragón, siglos XIII–XV. Estructuras de poder y conflictos de clase (Madrid: Siglo XXI, 1981);Google Scholar
  23. Esteban Sarasa Sánchez, “Mitos y ritos feudales en Aragón. El caso de doña Brianda de Luna,” I Congreso de Aragón de Etnología y Antropología (Zaragoza: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 1979), pp. 127–32;Google Scholar
  24. Salvador Sanpere Miquel, Las damas d’Aragó (Barcelona: Impresa de la Renaixensa, 1879), pp. 89–105, andGoogle Scholar
  25. Núria Silleras-Fernández, Power, Piety, and Patronage in Late Medieval Queenship: Maria de Luna (New York: Palgrave McMillan, 2008), pp. 67–72.Google Scholar
  26. 38.
    See Ronald G. Asch, “Court and Household from the Fifteenth to the Seventeenth Centuries,” in Princes, Patronage, and the Nobility: The Court at the Beginning of the Modern Age, c.1450–1650, ed. R. G. Asch and A. M. Birke (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 1–38;Google Scholar
  27. Erin Jordan, Women, Power, and Religious Patronage in the Middle Ages (New York: Palgrave, 2006), pp. 62–63;Google Scholar
  28. Rita Gomes, The Making of a Court Society: Kings and Nobles in Late Medieval Portugal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp.152–53;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Diana Webb, “Queen and Patron,” in Queens and Queenship in Medieval Europe, ed. Anne J. Duggan (Suffolk: Boydell, 1997), pp. 205–22. See also Helen A. Gaudette’s chapter in this book on Melisende of Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  30. 39.
    For the political role of queens, see Ernst Kantorowicz, The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967), pp. 381–83;Google Scholar
  31. Michel Foucault, History of Sexuality, 2 vols. (New York: Pantheon, 1978), I: 92–102;Google Scholar
  32. Theresa Earenfight, “Partners in Politics,” in Queenship and Political Power in Medieval and Early Modern Spain, ed. T. Earenfight (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2005), pp. xiii–xxviii, esp. pp. xiv–xvi.Google Scholar
  33. 40.
    The lieutenant acted as a deputy for the king when he was absent from his kingdoms, during war or other times of crisis, or when he was needed in one specific kingdom. Absent an heir, the position normally went to the queen. See Jesús Lalinde, “Virreyes y lugartenientes medievales en la Corona de Aragón,” Cuadernos de Historia de España 31–32 (1960): 98–172, esp. pp. 111, 121; Theresa Earenfight, “Absent Kings: Queens as Political Partners in the Medieval Crown of Aragon,” in Earenfight, Queenship and Political Power, pp. 33–51; Núria Silleras-Fernández, “Spirit and Force: Politics, Public and Private in the Reign of Maria de Luna (1369–1406),” in Earenfight, Queenship and Political Power, pp. 78–80.Google Scholar
  34. 48.
    Santiago Sobrequés Vidal, Els barons de Catalunya (Barcelona: Editorial Teide, 1957), pp. 146–49.Google Scholar
  35. 51.
    Daniel Girona Llagostera, Itinerari del Rei en Joan I (1387–1396) (Barcelona: Extret de la Revista d’Estudis Universitaris Catalans, 1931), p. 1.Google Scholar
  36. 56.
    Núria Silleras-Fernández, “Queenship en la Corona de Aragón en la Baja Edad Media: estudio y propuesta terminológica,” La Coránica. A Journal of Medieval Spanish Language and Literature 32:1 (2003), pp. 120–25.Google Scholar
  37. 61.
    Zurita, Anales, IV: 718–19 [X:XL]; Roca, “La reyna,” p. 145; Boscolo, La reina, pp. 131–33. In 1460, Jaume Roig, a Valencian who was official physician of María of Castile (r. 1416–58), queen of Aragonese King Alfonso the Magnanimous (r. 1416–58) wrote a misogynistic satire known as the Spill (“The Mirror”) or the Llibre de les dones (“The Book of Women”). Roig recounts the story of Sibil-la and alleges that she was judicially tortured along with her accomplices, an opinion the sixteenth-century Aragonese historian Jerónimo Zurita agreed with. This is unlikely and probably represents an embellishment on the part of Roig. For Joan to attribute sickness to sorcery was completely in character. Not only was he frequently ill, but also he was superstitious. When his fiancée Jeanne de Valois died in 1371 at Beziers en route to their wedding ceremony (see above, n. 8) he arrested Bonanada, a midwife who served in the household of his mother, Elionor de Sicilia, because it was rumored she had killed the princess using sorcery. Queen Elionor intervened. In an angry letter she defended Bonanada’s innocence, demanded her immediate release, discredited the woman’s accusers as liars, and shamed Joan by saying that was inappropriate for a future king to give credence to obviously fantastic tales. See the document in Roca, “Johan I,” pp. 372–3 (10–6–1373). See also Robin Briggs, Witches and Neighbors: The Social and Cultural Context of European Witchcraft (New York: Penguin, 1998), pp. 61–63.Google Scholar
  38. 64.
    Zurita, IV: 720 [X:XL]. Pere named Sibil-la as one of the executors of his will and specified that she was to have the care of their daughter Isabel and any other children they might have (the queen was pregnant when the document was drafted), and confirmed various donations and properties he had given her. The will is edited in Antoni Udina Abelló, Els testaments dels comtes de Barcelona i dels reis de la Corona d’Aragó (Barcelona: Fundació Noguera, 2001), pp. 340–54 (8–17–1379). See also Roca, “La reyna,” pp. 147–54.Google Scholar
  39. 66.
    Astute members of the elite understood this. After the death of Martí in 1410, his second wife, Margarida de Prades, became enamored of her chamberlain, Joan de Vilaragut. She married him and had a child but kept the relationship in absolute secrecy to her death. Núria Silleras-Fernández, “Widowhood and Deception: Ambiguities of Queenship in Late Medieval Crown of Aragon,” in Shell Games. Studies in Scams, Frauds, and Deceits (1300–1650), ed. M. Crane, R. Raiswell and M. Reeves (Toronto: Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies, 2004), pp. 185–87 and 196–207.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Theresa Earenfight 2010

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations