Abstract
New circumstances shaped China’s strategic options in the first decade of the new century. First, it undeniably rose in the ranks of world powers, firmly securing the second spot and gaining recognition as a serious challenger for advancing to the top spot. Second, it faced a world in which U.S. power was relatively diminished and distracted, shifting the balance from Chinese dependency to mutual dependency. Third, it had emerged as the centerpiece in Asian economic integration, thriving from a new division of labor that made it economically indispensable both for its neighbors and for the linkages leading to global markets. Finally, China acquired the image of a separate center of global politics and values, even if it disavowed the much-ballyhooed concept of the “Beijing consensus” and eschewed a return to cold war polarization centered on the divide between the “free world” and the socialist bloc. The challenge was no longer to manage weakness, but to calibrate the optimal balance between cautious deference that would allay concerns about a “China threat” and bold assertiveness to realize goals that had been postponed or were assumed to be achievable only when China had built up considerable national power.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
David Michael Lampton, The Three Faces of Chinese Power: Might, Money, and Minds (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008).
Bobo Lo, Axis of Convenience: Moscow, Beijing, and the New Geopolitics (Washington: Brookings Institution, 2008).
Gilbert Rozman, “The Sino-Russian Strategic Partnership: How Close? Where To?” in David M. Finkelstein and James Bellacqua, eds., The Future of China-Russia Relations (Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press, 2010), pp. 12–32.
Gilbert Rozman, “Narrowing the Values Gap in Sino-Japanese Relations: Lessons from 2006–2008,” in Gerrit Gong and Victor Teo, eds., Reconceptualizing the Divide: Identity, Memory, and Nationalism in Sino-Japanese Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009), pp. 26–52.
Mark Lanteigne, “In Medias Res: The Development of Shanghai Cooperation Organization as a Security Community,” Pacific Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 4 (Winter 2006–07), pp. 616–18.
Gilbert Rozman, “South Korea and the Sino-Japanese Rivalry: A Middle Power’s Options within the East Asian Core Triangle,” Pacific Review, Vol. 20, No. 2 (June 2007), pp. 197–220.
Gilbert Rozman, Strategic Thinking about the Korean Nuclear Crisis: Four Parties Caught between North Korea and the United States (New York: Palgrave, 2007), Chs. 5–6.
Copyright information
© 2010 Gilbert Rozman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rozman, G. (2010). Chinese Strategic Thought 2001–09. In: Chinese Strategic Thought toward Asia. Strategic Thought in Northeast Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230105751_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230105751_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-03367-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31154-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)