Skip to main content

Chinese Strategic Thought 2001–09

  • Chapter
Chinese Strategic Thought toward Asia

Part of the book series: Strategic Thought in Northeast Asia ((STNA))

  • 114 Accesses

Abstract

New circumstances shaped China’s strategic options in the first decade of the new century. First, it undeniably rose in the ranks of world powers, firmly securing the second spot and gaining recognition as a serious challenger for advancing to the top spot. Second, it faced a world in which U.S. power was relatively diminished and distracted, shifting the balance from Chinese dependency to mutual dependency. Third, it had emerged as the centerpiece in Asian economic integration, thriving from a new division of labor that made it economically indispensable both for its neighbors and for the linkages leading to global markets. Finally, China acquired the image of a separate center of global politics and values, even if it disavowed the much-ballyhooed concept of the “Beijing consensus” and eschewed a return to cold war polarization centered on the divide between the “free world” and the socialist bloc. The challenge was no longer to manage weakness, but to calibrate the optimal balance between cautious deference that would allay concerns about a “China threat” and bold assertiveness to realize goals that had been postponed or were assumed to be achievable only when China had built up considerable national power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. David Michael Lampton, The Three Faces of Chinese Power: Might, Money, and Minds (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bobo Lo, Axis of Convenience: Moscow, Beijing, and the New Geopolitics (Washington: Brookings Institution, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gilbert Rozman, “The Sino-Russian Strategic Partnership: How Close? Where To?” in David M. Finkelstein and James Bellacqua, eds., The Future of China-Russia Relations (Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press, 2010), pp. 12–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gilbert Rozman, “Narrowing the Values Gap in Sino-Japanese Relations: Lessons from 2006–2008,” in Gerrit Gong and Victor Teo, eds., Reconceptualizing the Divide: Identity, Memory, and Nationalism in Sino-Japanese Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009), pp. 26–52.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mark Lanteigne, “In Medias Res: The Development of Shanghai Cooperation Organization as a Security Community,” Pacific Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 4 (Winter 2006–07), pp. 616–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilbert Rozman, “South Korea and the Sino-Japanese Rivalry: A Middle Power’s Options within the East Asian Core Triangle,” Pacific Review, Vol. 20, No. 2 (June 2007), pp. 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilbert Rozman, Strategic Thinking about the Korean Nuclear Crisis: Four Parties Caught between North Korea and the United States (New York: Palgrave, 2007), Chs. 5–6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Gilbert Rozman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rozman, G. (2010). Chinese Strategic Thought 2001–09. In: Chinese Strategic Thought toward Asia. Strategic Thought in Northeast Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230105751_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics