Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies of the Americas ((STAM))

  • 180 Accesses

Abstract

The processes of democratization and regionalization in the Southern Cone of Latin America ran roughly parallel to one another between 1985 and 1991. However, the nature of this relationship is by no means clear. The central aim of this book is to investigate the precise place of democracy in the regionalization process in the Southern Cone that led to the formation of the Common Market of the South, Mercosur, between Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay. It has been persuasively argued that democracy and regionalization in the Southern Cone in the second half of the 1980s were not only interrelated but mutually reinforcing.1 That is to say that the relationship went two ways: democracy affected the development of regionalization and, in turn, the latter had an impact on the democratization process. In this book attention is specifically devoted to how, if at all, democracy has affected or influenced the decision to integrate taken by Argentina and Brazil that later led to the creation of Mercosur. The investigation has been conducted without predetermined intention or conclusion. The research was not intended to reinforce the body of democratic peace literature but rather to explore a set of concomitant historical events that were highly significant for the region concerned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Franklyn Steves, 2001, “Regional Cooperation and Democratic Consolidation in the Southern Cone of Latin America,” Democratisation, 8:3, pp. 75–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. See Andrew Hurrell, 2001, “The Politics of Regional Integration in Mercosur,” in Victor Bulmer-Thomas (ed.), Regional Integration in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Political Economy of Open Regionalism, Institute of Latin American Studies, London, pp. 194–211

    Google Scholar 

  3. Philippe C. Schmitter, 1991, “Change in Regime Type and Progress in International Relations,” in Emanuel Adler and Beverly Crawford (eds), Progress in Postwar International Relations, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 89–127.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andrés Malamud, 2000, Mercosur: From “Delegative Democracies” to “Delegative integration”?, Paper prepared for the 2000 meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Miami, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Malamud, 2003, “Presidentialism and Mercosur: A Hidden Cause for a Successful Experience,” in Finn Laursen (ed.), Comparative Regional Integration: Theoretical Perspectives, Ashgate, London, pp. 53–73

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peter Coffey (ed.), 1998, Mercosur, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston and London. Riordan Roett (ed.), 1999, Mercosur. Regional Integration, World Markets, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder CO. Victor Bulmer-Thornas (ed.), 2001, Regional Integration in Latin America and the Caribbean: the Political Economy of Open Regionalism, ILAS, London. Jaime Behar

    Google Scholar 

  7. David R. Dàvila-Villers, 1992, “Competition and Co-operation in the River Plate—The Democratic Transition and Mercosur,” Bulletin of Latin American Research, 11:3, September, pp. 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sylvia M. Williams, 1996, “Integration in South America: The Mercosur Experience,” International Relations, 13:2, August, pp. 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wayne A. Selcher, 1985, “Brazilian-Argentine Relations in the 1980s: From Wary Rivalry to Friendly Competition,” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 27:2, pp. 25–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Philippe C. Schmitter, 1991, “Change in Regime Type and Progress in International Relations,” in Emanuel Adler and Beverly Crawford (eds), Progress in Postwar International Relations, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 89–127.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mario Sznajder, 1996, “Transition in South America: Models of Limited Democracy,” Democratization, 3:3, pp. 360–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Andrew Hurrell, 1995, “Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective,” in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell (eds), Regionalism in World-Politics, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 37–73.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Walter Carlsnaes, 2002 “Foreign Policy,” in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and B.A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations, Sage, London, pp. 331–349.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin Hollis and Steve Smith, 1990, Explaining and Understanding International Relations, Clarendon Press, Oxford, p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For a milestone example of this kind of approach, see Philip Zelikow and Condoleezza Rice, 1995, Germany Unified and Europe Transformed, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Graham Allison and Philip Zelikow, 1999, The Essence of Decision. Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Longman, New York, p. 312.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ronald J. Grele, 1998, “Movement without Aim: Methodological and Theoretical Problems in Oral History,” in Robert Perks and Alistair Thomson (eds), The Oral History Reader, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 38–52

    Google Scholar 

  18. Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane, 1993, “Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework,” in Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane (eds), Ideas and Foreign Policy. Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, Cornell University Press, Ithaca NY and London, pp. 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Gian Luca Gardini

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gardini, G.L. (2010). Introduction. In: The Origins of Mercosur. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230105546_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics