Abstract
The processes of democratization and regionalization in the Southern Cone of Latin America ran roughly parallel to one another between 1985 and 1991. However, the nature of this relationship is by no means clear. The central aim of this book is to investigate the precise place of democracy in the regionalization process in the Southern Cone that led to the formation of the Common Market of the South, Mercosur, between Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay. It has been persuasively argued that democracy and regionalization in the Southern Cone in the second half of the 1980s were not only interrelated but mutually reinforcing.1 That is to say that the relationship went two ways: democracy affected the development of regionalization and, in turn, the latter had an impact on the democratization process. In this book attention is specifically devoted to how, if at all, democracy has affected or influenced the decision to integrate taken by Argentina and Brazil that later led to the creation of Mercosur. The investigation has been conducted without predetermined intention or conclusion. The research was not intended to reinforce the body of democratic peace literature but rather to explore a set of concomitant historical events that were highly significant for the region concerned.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Franklyn Steves, 2001, “Regional Cooperation and Democratic Consolidation in the Southern Cone of Latin America,” Democratisation, 8:3, pp. 75–100.
See Andrew Hurrell, 2001, “The Politics of Regional Integration in Mercosur,” in Victor Bulmer-Thomas (ed.), Regional Integration in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Political Economy of Open Regionalism, Institute of Latin American Studies, London, pp. 194–211
Philippe C. Schmitter, 1991, “Change in Regime Type and Progress in International Relations,” in Emanuel Adler and Beverly Crawford (eds), Progress in Postwar International Relations, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 89–127.
Andrés Malamud, 2000, Mercosur: From “Delegative Democracies” to “Delegative integration”?, Paper prepared for the 2000 meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Miami, p. 5.
Malamud, 2003, “Presidentialism and Mercosur: A Hidden Cause for a Successful Experience,” in Finn Laursen (ed.), Comparative Regional Integration: Theoretical Perspectives, Ashgate, London, pp. 53–73
Peter Coffey (ed.), 1998, Mercosur, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston and London. Riordan Roett (ed.), 1999, Mercosur. Regional Integration, World Markets, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder CO. Victor Bulmer-Thornas (ed.), 2001, Regional Integration in Latin America and the Caribbean: the Political Economy of Open Regionalism, ILAS, London. Jaime Behar
David R. Dàvila-Villers, 1992, “Competition and Co-operation in the River Plate—The Democratic Transition and Mercosur,” Bulletin of Latin American Research, 11:3, September, pp. 261–277.
Sylvia M. Williams, 1996, “Integration in South America: The Mercosur Experience,” International Relations, 13:2, August, pp. 51–61.
Wayne A. Selcher, 1985, “Brazilian-Argentine Relations in the 1980s: From Wary Rivalry to Friendly Competition,” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 27:2, pp. 25–53.
Philippe C. Schmitter, 1991, “Change in Regime Type and Progress in International Relations,” in Emanuel Adler and Beverly Crawford (eds), Progress in Postwar International Relations, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 89–127.
Mario Sznajder, 1996, “Transition in South America: Models of Limited Democracy,” Democratization, 3:3, pp. 360–370.
Andrew Hurrell, 1995, “Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective,” in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell (eds), Regionalism in World-Politics, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 37–73.
Walter Carlsnaes, 2002 “Foreign Policy,” in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and B.A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations, Sage, London, pp. 331–349.
Martin Hollis and Steve Smith, 1990, Explaining and Understanding International Relations, Clarendon Press, Oxford, p. 74.
For a milestone example of this kind of approach, see Philip Zelikow and Condoleezza Rice, 1995, Germany Unified and Europe Transformed, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
Graham Allison and Philip Zelikow, 1999, The Essence of Decision. Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Longman, New York, p. 312.
Ronald J. Grele, 1998, “Movement without Aim: Methodological and Theoretical Problems in Oral History,” in Robert Perks and Alistair Thomson (eds), The Oral History Reader, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 38–52
Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane, 1993, “Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework,” in Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane (eds), Ideas and Foreign Policy. Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, Cornell University Press, Ithaca NY and London, pp. 3–30.
Copyright information
© 2010 Gian Luca Gardini
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gardini, G.L. (2010). Introduction. In: The Origins of Mercosur. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230105546_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230105546_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37766-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10554-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)