Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • 280 Accesses

Part of the book series: Italian and Italian American Studies ((IIAS))

Abstract

The above quotation is from Monica Vitti,1 a well-known “diva” of Italian cinema whose acting and directorial expertise I greatly admire, and it succinctly provides a good explanation of the roles that women are supposed to play in Italian cinema, thus preparing the readers for the main topic of this book. This type of research, according to Christine Gledhill, has already been undertaken in the United States with results that seem to validate Monica Vitti’s statement, as they uphold the view that in film, women “do not have a voice, that the female point of view is not heard.”2 To my knowledge, this type of research has not yet been undertaken in Italy in book form, and it is the goal of this book to raise more interest for this topic. For several years, while teaching and doing research on Italian film and gender studies as a professor of Italian at the University of California at Los Angeles, I thought of combining these two areas of study in a book that would collect my observations on the representation of women in Italian cinema. Women’s presence in Italian cinema is indeed paramount, as most Italian films seem to weave their narrative plots around beautiful women and their love relationships with men. The film discourse, however, seems to limit the relevance of the female protagonists’ role vis-à-vis the male protagonists’ role, and consequently the film spectators, faced with fascinating images of beautiful but powerless women on the screen, find themselves constantly confronted with what Nancy Chodorov calls “the intertwining of sexuality, gender, inequality and power.”3

It is incredible how very few Italian directors and scriptwriters are seriously interested in what a woman thinks or by what a woman is moved… In cinema, when they write a script, nobody writes for women characters. How many times a scriptwriter has told me: “My dear Monica, how can I write cinema stories for you? You are a woman and what does a woman do? She does not go to war; she has no profession… What can I have you do? Only a love story can I make you do; that you have children, suffer, he leaves you, you are desperate …” You see, this is the only function they give me.

—Monica Vitti

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. As stated by Cristine Gledhill in “Recent Developments in Feminist Criticism,” in Film, Theory and Criticism, ed. Gerald Mast, Marshall Cohen, and Leo Braudy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), 93.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nancy Chodorov, “G ender as Personal and Cultural,” in The Second Signs Reader: Ferninist Scholarship 1983–1996, ed. Ruth-Ellen B. Joeres and Barbara Laslett (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), 216–44.

    Google Scholar 

  3. According to Teresa De Lauretis in Alice Doesn’t Fern inism, Semiotics, Cinema (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Laura Mulvey in Visual and Other Pleasures (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a more detailed discussion of the origins of cinema, see my “The Origins of Italian Cinema,” in Carlo Celli and Marga Cottino-Jones, A New Guide to Italian Cinema, 3rd ed. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Patriarchy as a system is founded upon the family and the importance it has in society, centered as it is upon a strong, all-powerful male figure, the father, or pater in Latin, and a submissive, nurturing yet powerless female figure, the mother. This view has been strongly supported by Christian ideology from the time of Genesis and its interpreters, starting with St. Paul and the first fathers of the church. Indeed, according to St. Paul, “Women should be subject to their men… Woman’s authority is nil; let her in all things be subject to man. Adam was beguiled by Eve, not she by him. It is right that he, whom woman led to wrong doing, should have her under his direction, so that he may not fail a second time through female levity.” History of Ideas on Woman, ed. Rosemary Agonito (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1977), 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  7. In the last few decades, psychoanalysis has proposed interesting perspectives on the role that women, and especially mothers, play in society. Consult Chris Weedon’s Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory (New York: Blackwell, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Ann Kaplan’s Motherhood and Representation (London: Routledge, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Julia Kristeva’s Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Culture (New York: Columbia University Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Giuliana Bruno’s’ collection of essays in Off-Screen: Women and Film in Italy (London: Rout-ledge, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jackie Byars performs similar analyses in her essay “Gazes/Voices/Power: Expanding Psychoanalysis for Feminist Film and Television Theory,” in Female Spectators, Looking at Film And Television, ed. E. Deidre Pribiam (London: Verso, 1992), 110–31.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For an exhaustive discussion of this topic, see Christian Metz’s The Im aginary Sign ifier: Psychoanalysis and Cinema (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  13. For a discussion of this expression, see the introduction to the collection Stardom: Industry of Desire, ed. Christine Gledhill (New York: Routledge, 1991), xiii–xx.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jonathan Rosenbaum, Movies as Politics (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1997), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. This term has been used by Dorothy Dinnerstein in the introduction to her book, The Mermaid and the Minotaur: Sexual Arrangements and Human Malaise (New York: Harper & Row, 1976), 2–3

    Google Scholar 

  16. Readers interested in this approach may consult also the collection of articles in Feminism and Materialism: Women and Modes of Production, ed. Annette Kuhn and Ann Marie Wolpe (London: Routledge, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marcia Landy’s book, Film, Politics, and Gramsci (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Timothy Corrigan, A Short Guide to Writing about FILM (New York: Longman, 1997), 88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Marga Cottino-Jones

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cottino-Jones, M. (2010). Introduction. In: Women, Desire, and Power in Italian Cinema. Italian and Italian American Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230105485_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics