Skip to main content

Intersectionality, Inequality, and Eu Law

  • Chapter
  • 252 Accesses

Abstract

Over the last decade, the European Union (EU) has expanded the definition of illegal discrimination to include race, ethnicity, religion, disability, and sexual orientation. Does the added recognition of these discriminations to sex discrimination confront the manifold dimensions of oppression that women experience? The assertion that women are not a monolithic group may now be common, but what (if any) are the material implications of this insight? This chapter seeks to answer these queries by focusing on lesbians and their potential for redress against discrimination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000, implementing the principle of equal treatment on grounds of racial and ethnic origin. Official Journal L 180/22-26, 19.07.2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000, establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation. Official Journal L 303/16-22, 02.12.2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams. 1993. Beyond racism and misogyny: Black feminism and 2 Live Crew. In Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment, ed. Mari. J. Matsuda, Charles. R. Lawrence III, Richard Delgado and Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw, 111–132. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, R. Amy. 2007. Sexual Equality in an Integrated Europe. New York: Palgrave /M acmill an.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2004. Equality and Non-Discrimination in an Enlarged European Union: Green paper. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2006a. Eurobarorneter 66. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2006b. Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Equality Between Women and Men. 22.02.06: COM (2006) 71 Final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2007. Tackling Multiple Discrimination: Practices, Policies and Laws. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2008. Gender Mainstreaming—General Overview, http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/gender_equality/gender_mainstreaming/general_overview_en.html.

  • European Court of Justice. 1982. Garland v British Rail Engineering, Case 12/81 [1982] ECR 359.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 1998 Grant v South-West Trains Ltd., Case C 249/96, ECR 621.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2001. D and Sweden v Council, Cases C-122/99P and C-125/99P, ECR 4319.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2004. KB v National Health Service Pensions Agency, Case 117/01, ECR 541.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2008. Tadao Maruko v. Versorgungsanstalt der deutschen Bühnen, Case C-267/06, ECR 1–01757.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Human Rights. 1997. X, Y and Z v. UK, Application 21830/93 (1997) 24 EHRR 143.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of First Instance. 1999. D v. Council, Case T-264/97, Répons of European Community Staff Cases II—1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredman, Sandra. 2001. Equality: A new generation? Industrial Law Journal 30(2): 145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldirova, Renata. 2008. Same-sex couples score victory on pension rights. EU ob server, com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannett, Sarah. 2003. Equality at the intersections: The legislative and judicial failure to tackle multiple discrimination. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23(1): 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Virginia. 1996. Using EC law to challenge sexual orientation discrimination at work. In Sex Equality Law in the European Union, ed. Tamara Hervey and David O’Keeffe, 267–281. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzleither, Elisabeth. 2005. Mainstreaming equality: Dis/entangling grounds of discrimination. Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems 14(3): 926–956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, Caroline. 1998. Lisa Grant v South-West Trains: The limited utility of sex discrimination in securing lesbian and gay rights. Temple International and Comparative Law 12(2): 403–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • OPTEM. 2002. Study on Integrating Gender Mainstreaming into Employment Policies: Covering Public-Authority Officials Responsible for Employment Policies and Social Partners in the 15 Member States of the European Union, http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/news/2002/nov/survey_gender_en.pdf.

  • Platero, Raquel. 2007. Love and the state: Gay marriage in Spain. Feminist Legal Studies 15(3): 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, Ruthann. 1994. Resisting the family: Repositioning lesbians in legal theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 19(4): 975–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Robert. 2004. NGOs mobilisation against homophobic crime in France. ILGA Euro-Letter 113: 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stychin, Carl. 2006. Not (quite) a horse and carriage. Feminist Legal Studies 14(1): 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toner, Helen. 2004. Partnership Rights, Free Movement and EU Law. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treaty of Amsterdam. 1997. OfficialJournal C 340, 10.11.97.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Court of Appeal. 2004. Bahl v the Law Society, IRLR 799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, Mieke. 2006. Multiple inequalities, intersectionality and the European Union. European Journal of Women’s Studies 13(3): 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, Claire and Susan Boyd. 2006. Losing the feminist voice? Debates on the legal recognition of same sex partnerships in Canada. Feminist Legal Studies 14(2): 213–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Elisabeth Prügl and Markus Thiel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elman, R.A. (2009). Intersectionality, Inequality, and Eu Law. In: Prügl, E., Thiel, M. (eds) Diversity in the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230104167_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics