Skip to main content

Migrant Women: Negotiating Rights And Recognition in the Political and Legal Framework of the European Union

  • Chapter
Diversity in the European Union
  • 249 Accesses

Abstract

“When you organize a training on Gender Mainstreaming... you dis- cover that nationality and legal status... are not yet recognized or are, at most, secondary factors,” though manuals on program evaluation indicate the goal of reducing inequalities related to ‘ multiple discriminations.’ The quote points to the difficulties a local project in the EQUAL initia- tive of the European Union (EU) faces: the project, which offers services for the professional qualification of refugees and asylum seekers, tries to marry official program evaluation criteria, general policy guidelines, and its own approach. These perspectives and requirements do not always match. Thus the project creates its own approach: it takes the already existing instruments and institutions from gender mainstreaming, adds “diversity,” and renames it as “Diversity Mainstreaming.” As the intro- ductory example shows, various markers of identity or ascription, such as religion, sexual orientation, age, and ethnicity, matter for migrant women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • AGG. 2006. Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz, zuletzt geändert durch Artikel 15 Abs. 66 des Gesetzes vom 5. February 2009 (BGBl. I S. 160). BGBl 1, no. 14.08.2006 (2006): 1897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbeitsgruppe Migration und Gender. 2007. EQUAL, aber femdbestimmt. Über die Situation von Migrantinnen/Asylbewerberinnen und Roma am österreichischen Arbeitsmarkt. Eine Bestandsaufnahme mit Empfehlungen, http://www.zeitraum.coat/media/downloads/35_Migration_GenderThesenpapier.pdl.

  • Baer, Susanne. 2006. Chronologie Antidiskriminierungsgesetz — Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz. http://baer.rewi.hu-berlin.de/wissen/antidiskriminierung srecht/antidiskriminierungsgesetzgebung.

  • Braunmühl, Claudia von. 2007. Diverse gender—gendered diversity: Eine Gewinn-und Verlustrechnung. In Transformation des Politischen durch Gender Mainstreaming? Eine kritische Revision aus frauenpolitischer Sicht, ed. Heinrich Böll Stiftung Grüne Akademie, 3SMI8. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLIP, European Network of Cities for Local Integration Policies for Migrants. 2009. Info sheet, http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2008/105/en/1/EF08105EN.pdf.

  • Council of Europe. 1950. The European Convention on Human Rights and its Five Protocols. Rome, 4 November 1950. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/ en/Treaties/Html/005.htm.

  • Council Directive (EU-Council) 2000a/43/EC of June 29 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin. Official Journal of the European Communities L 180, no. 19/07/2000: 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive. 2000b. (EU-Council) Council Directive establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation. Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000. Official Journal of the European Communities h 303, no. 2.12.2000: 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive. 2004. (EU-Council) Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services. Official Journal of the European Communities L 373, no. 21/12/2004: 37–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive. 2007. Council Regulation (EC), No. 168/2007 of 15 February 2007 establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. Official Journal of the European Communities L 53: 1–14, http://fra.europa.eu/ fraWebsite/attachments/reg_168-2007_en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2000. Towards a Community Strategy Framework for Gender Equality 2000–2005. Com (2000) 335 final. 7.6.2000. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive. 2005. The Business Case for Diversity. Good Practices in the Work place, http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/fundamental_rights/pdf/events/ busicase_en.pdf.

  • Council Directive. 2005 a. COM/2005/0389 final. A common agenda for integration. Framework for the integration of third-country nationals in the European Union. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM(2005):0389:FIN:EN:PDF.

  • Council Directive. 2005 b. Report on Equality Between Women and Men, 2005. COM (2005)44 final, 14.02.2005. http://www.ec.europa.eu/employment_social/news/200 5 /feb/ gender_equality_20 0 5_report_eu.pdf.

  • Council Directive. 2006. A Roadmap for Equality Between Women and Men. 2006–2010 (also: COM(2006)92 final, 01.03.2006). Luxembourg: EC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive. 2008. Continuing the Diversity Journey. Business Practices, Perspectives and Benefits. Luxembourg: EC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive. 2008. Proposal for a Council Directive on Implementing the Principle of Equal Treatment Between Persons Irrespective of Religion or Belief, Disability, Age or Sexual Orientation. COM(2008) 426 final. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission and Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services CSES. 2008. Evaluation of the European Business Test Panel—Final Report. DG Internal Market and Services, http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/ebtp/evaluation/ report-2008_en.pdf.

  • European Court of Justice. Case C-13/05-Sonia Chacon Navas v Eurest Colec-tividades SA Directive 2000/78/EC. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/ LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62005J0013:EN:HTML.

  • ENIE, European Network of Independent Experts in the non-discrimination field. 2005. Developing Anti-Discrimination Law in Europe. The 25 EU Member States Compared. Utrecht, Brussels: Human European Consultancy, Migration Policy Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and Council of the European Union. 2006. Directive 2OO6/54/EC on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast). Official Journal of the European Communities L 204, no. 26.07.2006:23-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and Council of the European Union. 2002. Directive 2OO2/73/EC amending Council Directive 76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions. Official Journal of the European Communities L 269, no. 05/10/2002: 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Communities. 1997. Treaty of Amsterdam, www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/treaty/pdf/amst-en.pdf.

  • ENAR, European Network Against Racism. 2005. Commission Communication on Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunities for All. Fact Sheet 23. www.enar-eu.org.

  • EWL, European Women’s Lobby. 1995. Confronting the fortress. Black and migrant women in the European Union. External Study, European Parliament, Directorate General for Research. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • EWL, European. 1999. Overcoming Discrimination: Selected Strategies Empowering Black, Ethnic Minority and Migrant Women. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • EWL, European. 2007. Equal Rights, Equal Voices: Migrant Women in the European Union. Brussels, 19–21 January 2007. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • EWL, European. 2008. Incorporating Gender in Integration Policies: The Way Forward. Invitation to a Sifminar www.efc.be/ftp/public/MigrationIG/EWL%20integration %event_011208_Brussels.doc.

  • Florida, Richard. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. And How it’s Transforming Work, Leisure and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluch tort Hamburg. 2005. Entwicklungspartnerschafi Fluchtort Hamburg: Berufliche Qualifikation für Flüchtlinge. Handlungskonzept Diversity Management. www.themenpool-migration.eu/download/dgende05.pdf.

  • Fraser, Nancy. 2001. Social Justice in the Knowledge Society: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation, www.wissensgesellschaft.org/themen/orientierung/ socialjustice.pdf.

  • Freedman, Jane and Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network EMHRN. 2008. Violence Against Migrant Women in the Euro-Med Region, www.mawgfra.unblog.fr/files/2008/04/violenceagainstmigrantwomenintheeuromed region.ppt.

  • Gültekin, Nevâl. 2006. Differenz, Gleichberechtigung und gesellschaftliche Widersprüche—Der fehlende Blick auf Einwanderlnnen. Zeitschrift fur Frauenforschung und Geschlechterstudien 23(3): 102–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics 5(1): 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantola, Johanna and Kevät Nousiainen. (2009) Institutionalising intersectionality in Europe: Legal and political analyses. International Feminist Journal of Politics 11(4) forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantola, Johanna and Judith Squires. 2008. From State Feminism to Market Feminism? Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Convention, 26-March 29-

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, Judith. 2000. Using gender to undo gender: A feminist degendering movement. Feminist Theory 1(1): 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, Leslie. 2005. The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30(3): 1771–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Andreas and Olga Drossou, eds. 2008. Politics of Diversity: Dossier. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung, http://www.migration-boell.de/web/diversity/ 48_1712.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Helga. 2008. Diversity in der Integrationspolitik von Frankfurt am Main. In Politics of diversity. Dossier, ed. Andreas Merx and Olga Drossou, 30–36. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung, http://www.migration-boell.de/web/ diversity/48_ 1712.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outshoorn, Joyce and Johanna Kantola, eds. 2007. Changing State Feminism. Houndsmill, Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politics & Gender. 2007, Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics: Intersectionality 3 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruß, Sabine and Helen Schwenken. 2008. Institutionelle Arrangements politischer Repräsentation von Migrantinnen im Ländervergleich: Wie reagieren alte und neue Einwanderungsländer auf Migration? Unpublished Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiek, Dagmar. 2008. Über den Umgang mit Mehrfachdiskriminierungen: Die Anti-Diskriminierungsrichtlinien und das AGG. In Frauen verändern EUROPA verändert Frauen, ed. Ulrike Schultz, 115–126. Düsseldorf: MGFFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwenken, Helen. 2006. Rechtlos, aber nicht ohne Stimme. Politische Mobilisierungen um irreguläre Migration in die Europäische Union. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Jo. 2005. Mainstreaming Equality and Diversity in European Union Law and Policy, www.enar-eu.org.

  • Smykalla, Sandra and Sandra Lewalter. 2007. Zur Relevanz von Wissen zu Gender, Diversity und Intersektionalität am Beispiel des Allgemeinen Gle-ichbehandlungsgesetzes. Presented at Wissenschaftliches Vernetzungstreffen: “Gender und Diversitätsmanagement”, Wien, 34.05.2007. http://www.wu-wien.ac.at/gender/vernetzungstreffen/vortrag_gkompz_intersek._agg_040507.pdf.

  • Squires, Judith. 2005. Is mainstreaming transformative? Theorizing main-streaming in the context of diversity and deliberation. Social Politics 12(3): 366–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, Barbara. 2006. Gender Mainstreaming, Frauenförderung, Diversity oder Antidiskriminierungspolitik — was führt wie zur Chancengleichheit,;’ Zeitschrift fiir Frauenforschung und Geschlechterstudien 23(3): 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratigaki, Maria. 2005. Gender mainstreaming vs. positive action: An ongoing conflict in EU gender equality policy. European Journal of Women’s Studies 12(2): 165–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, Mieke. 2007. Wie muss Gender Mainstreaming umgesetzt werden, damit es ein politisches Instrument ist, das die Geschlechterhierarchie transformieren kann? In Transformation des Politischen durch Gender Mainstreaming? Eine kritische Revision aus frauenpolitischer Sicht, ed. Heinrich Böll Stiftung Grüne Akademie, 9–16. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby, Silvia. 2005. Gender mainstreaming: Productive tensions in theory and practice. Social Politics 12(3): 321–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetterer, Angelika. 2002. Strategien rhetorischer Modernisierung: Gender mainstreaming, Managing Diversity und die Professionalisierung der Gender-Expertinnen. Zeitschrift für Frauenforschung und Geschlechterstudien no. 3: 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, Alison. 2004. Building velvet triangles: Gender and informal governance. In Informal Governance and the European Union, ed. Simona Piattoni and Thomas Christiansen, 76–93. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Elisabeth Prügl and Markus Thiel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schwenken, H. (2009). Migrant Women: Negotiating Rights And Recognition in the Political and Legal Framework of the European Union. In: Prügl, E., Thiel, M. (eds) Diversity in the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230104167_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics