Abstract
In his foundational work The Sublime Object of Ideology, Slavoj Žižek argues that ideology is not simply the fantasy that people believe about themselves and their society. The classical notion of ideology assumes it to be “false consciousness,” so if people were simply informed about how the world works, they would change it. Against this notion, drawing on Lacan, Althusser contended that ideology constitutes the subject’s “imaginary relations” to the real conditions of existence (109-112). In turn, Žižek argues that “ideology” is not only this Imaginary relationship to reality; rather, ideology itself is the notion that social reality relies on a fantasy: “the fundamental level of ideology, however, is not of an illusion masking the real state of things but that of an (unconscious) fantasy structuring our social reality itself” (Sublime 33). The ideological fantasy is that ideology can be separated from reality, whereas ideology is not only what people “think” or “know” but also—even primarily—what they do. Belief, Žižek continues, is not merely an individual or purely mental state; rather, it is “always materialized in our effective social reality: belief supports the fantasy which regulates social reality” (36). Therefore, ideological critique is not only a matter of figuring out how an ideological illusion relates to some reality constituted by its social relations (commodity exchange, value, labor), but also of identifying “the ideological fantasy efficient in social reality itself” (Žižek, Sublime 36).
It is important not simply to practice antiessentialist differencing ad infinitum but also to reconsider such a practice in conjunction with the rejection of referentiality that lies at the origins of poststructuralism. Exactly what is being thrown out when referentiality is theoretically rejected?
—Rey Chow
To right the situation, to null the transaction and be just to all on earth, we may have to relearn the sense of the world, the totality, that includes all peoples in every race, class, and gender.
—Masao Miyoshi
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2009 Sue J. Kim
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kim, S.J. (2009). The Ideological Fantasy of Otherness Postmodernism. In: Critiquing Postmodernism in Contemporary Discourses of Race. American Literature Readings in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230103962_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230103962_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38140-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10396-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)