Abstract
What place does a chapter discussing aid in dying, the choice made by a mentally competent, terminally ill patient to self-administer medication for the purpose of bringing about a peaceful death,1 have in a collection of chapters on “Medicine after the Holocaust”? Most of us will appreciate immediately that the Nazi regimes proram to terminate lives deemed unworthy by the state, including under the guise of “medical treatment,” bears no relation to the choice of a terminally ill individual to choose to exercise a measure of control over his or her own impending death. This chapter seeks to illuminate the differences between these scenarios and to provide an overview of the background and status of aid in dying in the United States.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Daniel Lee, “Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Conservative Critique of Intervention,” Hastings Center Repor? 33 (2003): 17–19.
Ronald Dworkin, Life’s Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedo? (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1993), 217.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Sheldon Rubenfeld
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tucker, K.L. (2010). What Does “Medicine after the Holocaust” Have to Do with Aid in Dying?. In: Rubenfeld, S. (eds) Medicine after the Holocaust. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230102293_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230102293_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-62192-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10229-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)