Abstract
War is political philosophy by other means. Politics is merely the process by which institutions—rules—distribute society’s benefits and obligations according to the philosophical ideas upon which people, leading their collective lives, have conferred legitimacy. The War of Ideas is a battle for this perception of legitimacy and accompanying popular support. Simply put, political philosophy is a hypothesis: if condition, then outcome. If a polity is organized according to a particular philosophical narrative and structure, then justice, security, and human flourishing will result. Plato, for example, advocated a rightly ordered society of philosopher kings, an auxiliary or guardian class, and producers—that is, rulers, those supporting and guided by the rulers, and the ruled. Plato supplemented this social organization with the “Noble Lie” or “Myth of the Metals,” claiming the respective social classes have gold, silver, and brass in their souls. Of course, those on the lower end of society’s benefits and privileges would believe they were not deprived as a result of some political or earthly injustice, just the harsh reality of the condition of their birth. These people are less likely to revolt.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Adapted from Clausewitz’s famous dictum, “War is a continuation of politics by other means.” Carl Von Clausewitz, On War, ed. Michael Eliot and Peter Paret (Princeton: University Press, 1989).
William Ebenstein and Alan O. Ebenstein, Introduction to Political Thinkers, 2nd ed. (New York: Wadsworth, 2001).
Ian Shapiro and Casiano Hacker-Cordon, eds., Democracy’s Values (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, August 1999), p. 4.
Emphasis on legitimacy, citizenship, and political processes in the West relative to the Muslim world is informed by Roger Scruton, The West and the Pest: Globalization and the Terrorist Threat (Wilmington, DE: ISI Book, 2002).
William McCants and Jarret Brachman, eds, Militant Ideology Atlas (West Point, NY: Combating Terrorism Center, U.S. Military Academy, 2006), p. 7.
Charles Kurzman, ed., Liberal Islam: A Sourcebook (Oxford: Oxford University Press USA, November 1998).
Some scholars use “political Islam” or “Islam-ism,” either of which is preferable to “Islamic Fundamentalism.” Portions of this paragraph are adapted from John P. Gallagher and Bradley L. Bowman, “Democratization and U.S. Grand Strategy,” in Choices: An American Government Pleader (Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing, June 2005).
Sayyid Qutb, Milestones (Damascus, Syria: Dar Al-Islam, 1964), p. 41.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Eric D. Patterson and John Gallagher
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gallagher, J., Patterson, E.D. (2009). Approaching the War of Ideas. In: Patterson, E.D., Gallagher, J. (eds) Debating the War of Ideas. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101982_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101982_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38209-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10198-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)