Abstract
Italian memories have often been divided. Events have been interpreted in contrasting ways, and the facts themselves are often contested. It has proved extremely difficult, if not impossible, for any group—public or private—to create a consensus around the past, or around ways of remembering that past. Various groups—be they regional, ethnic, political—have demanded that their memories be acknowledged. Individual events as well as history itself have been understood in a bewildering variety of ways. The state and other public bodies have rarely been able to build durable and commonly agreed practices of commemoration. There has been no closure, no “truth,” and little reconciliation.
Memory is a battlefield, where nothing is neutral and where everything is continually contested.
—Luisa Passerini, “Memories of Resistance”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2009 John Foot
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Foot, J. (2009). Divided Memory. In: Italy’s Divided Memory. Italian and Italian American Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101838_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101838_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38105-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10183-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)