Advertisement

Reading Back, Reading Black, and Buck v. Bell

  • I. Bennett Capers
Chapter
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

When I was in law school, the main task was to master the black letter law. It was only after law school, when I gained some distance, that I realized that there was also another type of law that was equally important, which I’ve come to think of as “white letter law.”1 Unlike black letter law—which brings to mind statutory law, written law, the easily discernible law set forth as black letters on a white page—“white letter law” suggests societal and normative laws that stand side by side and often undergird black letter law but, as if inscribed in white ink on white paper, remain invisible to the naked eye.2 Still later, I realized that part of what I was bringing to the law was a different type of reading, a reading that was both counterhegemonic and attuned to the frequencies and registers of race—a reading practice I described in an essay titled Reading Back, Reading Black.3

Keywords

District Attorney Reading Practice African American Culture Eugenic Movement Race Matter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Awkward, Michael. “Race, Gender, and the Politics of Reading.” Black American Literature Forum 22, no. 1 (Spring 1988): 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beard, Aaron. “Prosecutor to be Disbarred for Duke Lacrosse Case ‘Fiasco.’” Chicago Tribune, June 17, 2007, sec. A.Google Scholar
  3. Bruinus, Harry. Better for All the World: The Secret History of Forced Sterilization and America’s Quest for Racial Purity. New York: Knopf, 2006.Google Scholar
  4. Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927).Google Scholar
  5. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 2002.Google Scholar
  6. Capers, I. Bennett. “Crime, Legitimacy, and Testilying.” Indiana Law Journal 83, no. 3 (2008): 835–80.Google Scholar
  7. Capers, I. Bennett. “Reading Back, Reading Black.” Hofstra Law Review 35, no. 1 (2006): 9–22.Google Scholar
  8. Capers, I. Bennett. “The Trial of Bigger Thomas: Race, Gender, and Trespass.” NYU Review of Law and Social Change 31, no. 1 (2006): 1–49.Google Scholar
  9. Carter, Dan T. Scottsboro: A Tragedy of the American South. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  10. Dwyer, Jim, and Susan Saulny. “Hair Evidence in Jogger Case is Discredited.” New York Times, October 25, 2002, sec. A.Google Scholar
  11. Fish, Stanley. Is There a Text in this Class! Cambridge, MA: Harvard, 1980.Google Scholar
  12. Gates, Henry Louis, Jr. “The Blackness of Blackness: A Critique of the Sign and the Signifying Monkey.” In Black Literature and Literary Theory, edited by Henry Louis Gates, Jr., 285–86. New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
  13. Gates, Henry Louis, Jr., ed. “Race,”Writing, and Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  14. Grant, Madison. The Passing of the Great Race. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons, 1916.Google Scholar
  15. Jardine, Alice. “Opaque Texts and Transparent Contexts.” In The Poetics of Gender, edited by Nancy K. Miller, 96–97. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  16. Lombardo, Paul A. “Three Generations, No Imbeciles: New Light on Buck v. Bell.” NYU Law Review 30, no. 1 (1985): 30–62.Google Scholar
  17. Mauro, Tony. “Remarks by Thomas Alter Argument.” Legal Times, December 16, 2002, p. 7.Google Scholar
  18. Morrison, Toni. Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination. New York: Vintage, 1992.Google Scholar
  19. Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908).Google Scholar
  20. Norm v. Alabama, 294 U.S. 587 (1934).Google Scholar
  21. Parker, Lauer. “Disbarment May Not End Nifong’s Troubles.” USA Today, June 18, 2007, sec. A.Google Scholar
  22. Powell et al. v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932)Google Scholar
  23. The Queen v. Dudley & Stephens, 14 Q.B.D. 273 (1884).Google Scholar
  24. Said, Edward W. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage, 1993.Google Scholar
  25. Skinnerv. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942).Google Scholar
  26. Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003).Google Scholar
  27. West, Cornel. Race Matters. Boston: Beacon, 1993.Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, Duff. “Hearing Ends in Disbarment for Prosecutor in Duke Case.” New York Times, June 17, 2007, sec. A.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Lovalerie King and Richard Schur 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Bennett Capers

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations