Abstract
While cases such as Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) infamously illustrate the failure of the U.S. courts to endorse full citizenship for African Americans, the civil rights victories under the Warren court offer the possibility that the law can be an important means by which African Americans can attain justice. However, U.S. history is filled with accounts of the law failing to be a salve for racial injury. Even cases that produce positive outcomes for African Americans can fail to provide truly reparative resolutions. In everyday legal parlance, reparative justice requires that a perpetrator both accept responsibility for causing injury and make restitution. A number of scholars have made arguments about what the enactment of reparations would look like, but I want to focus here on its most expansive meaning. “In the most literal sense,” Christopher Kutz explains, “a claim of repair is a claim to be made whole, to have a harm healed or corrected.”1 However, being made “whole” after racial injury—after any trauma—is a challenging and sometimes impossible exercise. Because racially injured subjects cannot return to a point of knowledge before the wound—where they no longer know what it is like to have been wounded—reparative justice is inevitably incomplete. Given the checkered history of the law’s efficacy and the impossibility of the law making a racially injured citizen politically or therapeutically whole, African Americans may sometimes decide, or be forced, to abandon the law as the path to reparations for harms perpetrated on black citizenry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Abreu, Martha. “Slave Mothers and Freed Children: Emancipation and Female Slave Debates on the ‘Free Womb’ Law Rio de Janeiro, 1871.” Journal of Latin American Studies 28 (October 1996): 567–80.
Baker, Houston. Blues, Ideology, and Afro-American Literature: A Vernacular History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
Brown, Wendy. “Wounded Attachments.” Political Theory 21, no. 3 (1993): 390–410.
Caruth, Cathy. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
Cognard-Black, Jennifer. “‘I Said Nothing’: The Rhetoric of Silence and Gayl Jones’s Corregidora.” National Women’s Studies Association Journal 13 (Spring 2001): 40–60.
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (July 1991): 1241–99.
Davis, Angela. Women, Race, and Class. New York: Vintage, 1981.
Dixon, Melvin. “Language as Evidence in the Novels of Gayl Jones.” In Black Women Writers (1950–1980): A Critical Evaluation, edited by Mari Evans, 236–48. Garden City, NY: Anchor-Doubled ay, 1984.
Estrich, Susan. “Rape.” The Yale Law Journal 95 (May 1986): 1087–1184.
Felman, Shoshanna, and Dori Laub. Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and Literature. New York: Routledge, 1992.
Giddens, Anthony. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992.
Gotanda, Neil. “A Critique of Our Constitution is Color-Blind.” Stanford Law Review 44 (November 1991): 1–68.
Harris, Trudier. “A Spiritual Journey: Gayl Jones’s Song for Anninho.”Callaloo 16 (October 1982): 105–11.
Henderson, Lynne N. “Legality and Empathy.” Michigan Law Review 85 (June 1987): 1574–1653.
Jacobs, Harriet. Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. Clayton, DE: Prestwick House, 2006.
Jones, G ayl. Corregid or a.Boston, MA: B eacon Press, 1975.
Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Ethics. Translated by Louis Infield. London: Methuen, 1930.
King, Lovalerie. “Resistance, Reappropriation, and Reconciliation: The Blues and Flying Africans in Gayl Jones’s Song for Anninho.” In After the Pain: Critical Essays on Gayl Jones, edited by Fiona Mills and Keith B. Mitchell, 241–57. New York: Peter Lang, 2006.
Kutz, Christopher. “Justice in Reparations: The Cost of Memory and the Value of Talk.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 32 (July 2004): 277–312.
MacKinnon, Catharine A. “Reflections of Sex Equality Under the Law.” Yale Law Journal 100 (March 1991): 1281–1328.
Plessy v.Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).
Reed, Annette Gordon. Sally Flemings and Thomas Jefferson: An American Controversy. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1997.
Rushdy, Ashraf A. Remembering Generations: Race and Family in Contemporary American Fiction. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001.
Toplin, Robert Brent. The Abolition of Slavery in Brazil. New York: Antheneum, 1971.
Twine, Frances Windance. Racism in a Racial Democracy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers, 998.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2009 Lovalerie King and Richard Schur
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wanzo, R. (2009). When Testimony Fails. In: King, L., Schur, R. (eds) African American Culture and Legal Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101722_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101722_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38243-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10172-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)