Advertisement

When Testimony Fails

Law and the Comforts of Intimacy in Gayl Jones’s Corregidora
  • Rebecca Wanzo
Chapter
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

While cases such as Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) infamously illustrate the failure of the U.S. courts to endorse full citizenship for African Americans, the civil rights victories under the Warren court offer the possibility that the law can be an important means by which African Americans can attain justice. However, U.S. history is filled with accounts of the law failing to be a salve for racial injury. Even cases that produce positive outcomes for African Americans can fail to provide truly reparative resolutions. In everyday legal parlance, reparative justice requires that a perpetrator both accept responsibility for causing injury and make restitution. A number of scholars have made arguments about what the enactment of reparations would look like, but I want to focus here on its most expansive meaning. “In the most literal sense,” Christopher Kutz explains, “a claim of repair is a claim to be made whole, to have a harm healed or corrected.”1 However, being made “whole” after racial injury—after any trauma—is a challenging and sometimes impossible exercise. Because racially injured subjects cannot return to a point of knowledge before the wound—where they no longer know what it is like to have been wounded—reparative justice is inevitably incomplete. Given the checkered history of the law’s efficacy and the impossibility of the law making a racially injured citizen politically or therapeutically whole, African Americans may sometimes decide, or be forced, to abandon the law as the path to reparations for harms perpetrated on black citizenry.

Keywords

Black Woman Slave Owner African American Culture Intimate Violence Complete Communion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Abreu, Martha. “Slave Mothers and Freed Children: Emancipation and Female Slave Debates on the ‘Free Womb’ Law Rio de Janeiro, 1871.” Journal of Latin American Studies 28 (October 1996): 567–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, Houston. Blues, Ideology, and Afro-American Literature: A Vernacular History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, Wendy. “Wounded Attachments.” Political Theory 21, no. 3 (1993): 390–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caruth, Cathy. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. Cognard-Black, Jennifer. “‘I Said Nothing’: The Rhetoric of Silence and Gayl Jones’s Corregidora.” National Women’s Studies Association Journal 13 (Spring 2001): 40–60.Google Scholar
  6. Crenshaw, Kimberlé. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (July 1991): 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, Angela. Women, Race, and Class. New York: Vintage, 1981.Google Scholar
  8. Dixon, Melvin. “Language as Evidence in the Novels of Gayl Jones.” In Black Women Writers (1950–1980): A Critical Evaluation, edited by Mari Evans, 236–48. Garden City, NY: Anchor-Doubled ay, 1984.Google Scholar
  9. Estrich, Susan. “Rape.” The Yale Law Journal 95 (May 1986): 1087–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Felman, Shoshanna, and Dori Laub. Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and Literature. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  11. Giddens, Anthony. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  12. Gotanda, Neil. “A Critique of Our Constitution is Color-Blind.” Stanford Law Review 44 (November 1991): 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris, Trudier. “A Spiritual Journey: Gayl Jones’s Song for Anninho.”Callaloo 16 (October 1982): 105–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henderson, Lynne N. “Legality and Empathy.” Michigan Law Review 85 (June 1987): 1574–1653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacobs, Harriet. Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. Clayton, DE: Prestwick House, 2006.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, G ayl. Corregid or a.Boston, MA: B eacon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  17. Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Ethics. Translated by Louis Infield. London: Methuen, 1930.Google Scholar
  18. King, Lovalerie. “Resistance, Reappropriation, and Reconciliation: The Blues and Flying Africans in Gayl Jones’s Song for Anninho.” In After the Pain: Critical Essays on Gayl Jones, edited by Fiona Mills and Keith B. Mitchell, 241–57. New York: Peter Lang, 2006.Google Scholar
  19. Kutz, Christopher. “Justice in Reparations: The Cost of Memory and the Value of Talk.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 32 (July 2004): 277–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MacKinnon, Catharine A. “Reflections of Sex Equality Under the Law.” Yale Law Journal 100 (March 1991): 1281–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Plessy v.Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).Google Scholar
  22. Reed, Annette Gordon. Sally Flemings and Thomas Jefferson: An American Controversy. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1997.Google Scholar
  23. Rushdy, Ashraf A. Remembering Generations: Race and Family in Contemporary American Fiction. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  24. Toplin, Robert Brent. The Abolition of Slavery in Brazil. New York: Antheneum, 1971.Google Scholar
  25. Twine, Frances Windance. Racism in a Racial Democracy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers, 998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Lovalerie King and Richard Schur 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebecca Wanzo

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations