Skip to main content

Machiavelli, Territoriality, and Lo Stato

  • Chapter
From Hierarchy to Anarchy
  • 267 Accesses

Abstract

Renaissance thought undermined the spatial hierarchies of the medieval political imaginary. The promotion of the ideal of sovereign man challenged the belief that man was a prisoner in space, trapped in a mundane world, which existed only as a dull reflection of the divine world of the heavens. Further, Machiavelli’s realism removed republic and princedom from the political theology of Christianity, in which territoriality was conceived of as an attribute of Christendom rather than as an exclusively political space, the locus of Aristotle’s zöon politikon. However, no sooner had the state been de-territorialized, extricated from the vertical spatial order of the medieval cosmos, than State-thought sought to re-territorialize it, to striate its space with the markers and symbols of sovereign territory. Concentrating on Machiavelli, this chapter explores how Renaissance political discourse territorialized lo stato by fixing sovereignty, violence, and identity onto state space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Giuseppe Prezzolini, Machiavelli: Anticristo (Rome: Gherardo Casini, 1954), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Felix Gilbert, Machiavelli and Guicciardini: Politics and History in Sixteenth Century Florence (New York: W. W. Norton, 1965), p. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. H. Hexter, The Vision of Politics on the Eve of the Reformation: More, Machiavelli and Seyssel (New York: Basic Books, 1973), p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Niccolò Machiavelli, Il Principe, ed. L. Arthur Burd (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1891), I, pp. 173–74. All subsequent citations are from this text and are my translations, unless stated otherwise.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sebastian de Grazia, Machiavelli in Hell (New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1989), pp. 158–59.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Adolf Berger, Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Roman Law (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1953), p. 441.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. H. Hinsley, Sovereignty, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jens Bartleson, A Genealogy of Sovereignty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 88–136.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. See Walter Ullman, “The Development of the Medieval Idea of Sovereignty,” English Historical Review, 64, 1949, pp. 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Walter Ullman, “Personality and Territoriality in the ‘Defensor Pacis’: The Problem of Political Humanism,” in Ullman, Law and Jurisdiction in the Middle Ages (London: Variorum Reprints, 1986), pp. 397–410. For Ullman the development of the principle of territorial sovereignty could be seen in the changing intitulations of kings from Rex Francorum to Rex Franciae and from Rex Anglorum to Rex Angliae.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Michel Foucault, “Governmentality,” in Graham Burchill, Colin Gordon and Peter Miller (eds.), The Foucault Effect (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), pp. 87–104, at p. 104. Foucault argues that the sixteenth-century territorial administrative state, analogous to the territorial a priori, of International Relations was supplanted in the classical age by the “governmental state,” no longer defined by its surface area or territory but by a population which it controls through economic savoir.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sheldon S. Wolin, “Machiavelli and the Economy of Violence,” in Wolin, Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1961), pp. 195–238, at p. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Niccolò Machiavelli, Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Levio, ed. Gennaro Sasso and Giorgio Inglese (Milano: Biblioteca Universale Rizzoli, 1984), III:iii, p. 467. My translation. Machiavelli’s reference is to Brutus who, according to Livy, not only ordered the death but attended the execution of his sons, the rebellious Tarquins.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Elena Fasano Guarani, “Machiavelli and the Crisis of the Italian Republics,” in Gisela Bock, Quentin Skinner, and Maurizio Viroli (eds.), Machiavelli and Republicanism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), pp. 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , tr. Alan Sheridan (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1979), pp.136–138.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pierangelo Schiera, “Legitimacy, Discipline and Institutions: Three Necessary Conditions for the Birth of the Modern State,” The Journal of Modern History, 67: Supplement (December 1995), pp. S11–33, at pp. S30 and S32

    Google Scholar 

  17. William E. Connolly, “Tocqueville, Territory and Violence,” Theory, Culture and Society, 11:1, 1994, pp. 19–40, at p. 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. G. A. Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975), p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Federico Chabod, L’idea di nazione (Bari: Editori Laterza, 1962), p. 7. My translation.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vincent Ilardi, “‘Italianita’ among Some Italian Intellectuals in the Early Sixteenth Century,” Traditio: Studies in Ancient and Medieval History, Thought and Religion, 12, 1956, pp. 339–67, at p. 362.

    Google Scholar 

  21. On Flavio Biondo see The Catholic Encyclopedia Vol. 11 (Online 2003), http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02575a.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Denys Hay, “Italy and Barbarian Europe,” in Italian Renaissance Studies, ed. E. F. Jacobs (London: Faber and Faber, 1960), pp. 48–68.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marcel Gagneux, “Italianité, Patrie Florentine et service de L’Église dans l’oeuvre et dans la vie de François Guichardin,” in Quêtes d’une identité collective chez les Italiens de la Renaissance (Paris: Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle, 1990), pp. 67–119, at p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Francesco Guicciardini, Storia d’Italia, ed. Silvana Seidel Menchi (Torino: Giulio Einaudi, 1971), IV:vi, pp. 376 and 377.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Jeremy Larkins

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Larkins, J. (2010). Machiavelli, Territoriality, and Lo Stato . In: From Hierarchy to Anarchy. Palgrave Macmillan History of International Thought Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101555_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics