Abstract
Among Protestant colleges and universities, especially those associated with the evangelical movement, much as been written about the integration of faith and learning.3 In fact, integration language and the implied task have become the hallmark of serious Christian institutions. For instance, David Dockery writes, “The integration of faith and learning is the distinctive characteristic of Christian higher education.”4 Despite the important contributions of the project, however, we believe the language of “integration of faith and learning” does not prove helpful when considering the overall purpose of Christian higher education or the moral development of Christian students. Our conclusion stems not from past or recent critiques of the integration model.5 In fact, we think the recent criticisms largely miss the mark and at times misrepresent the diversity of those approaches which adopt the language. Instead, we are more concerned with the habits of thinking that such language may foster when considering the overall purpose of Christian higher education and Christian moral education than with the general integration model (which we will largely defend). Thus, in this chapter, we propose an alternative language that we believe provides a more helpful way to articulate the moral purposes of Christian higher education.
… the old education … may be summed up by stating that the center of gravity is outside the child. It is in the teacher, the textbook, anywhere and everywhere you please except in the immediate instincts and activities of the child himself…Now the change which is coming into our education is the shifting of the center of gravity. It is a change, a revolution, not unlike that introduced by Copernicus when the astronomical center shifted from the earth to the sun. In this case the child becomes the sun about which the appliances of education revolve; he is the center about which they are organized.
—John Dewey1
To speak of Christ-centered liberal arts education is to make the claim that Jesus is the centerpiece of all human knowledge, the reference point for all our experience. It directs our attention to the only One who can serve as the centerpiece of an entire curriculum, the One to whom we must relate everything and without whom no fact, no theory, no subject matter can be fully appreciated.
—Duane Litfin2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
John Dewey, The School and Society and the Child and the Curriculum (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990), 34.
Duane Litfin, Conceiving the Christian College (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004), 65.
See, e.g., Nicholas Wolterstorff, Educating for Shalom: Essays on Christian Higher Education, eds. Clarence Joldersma and Gloria Stronks (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004).
David Dockery, “Preface” to The Integration of Faith and Learning: A Basic Bibliography at http://www.uu.edu/centers/christld/bibliog/ (accessed May 8, 2007).
For a recent example, see Douglas Jacobsen and Rhonda Hustedt Jacobsen, Scholarship & Christian Faith: Enlarging the Conversation (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).
William Hasker, “Faith-Learning Integration: An Overview,” Christian Scholars Review 21 (1992): 234.
Whitworth College, “Weyerhaeuser Center for Christian Faith & Learning,” http://www.whitworth.edu/FaithCenter/Index.aspx (assessed, January 22, 2009).
Al Wolters, Creation Regained: Biblical Basics for a Reformational Worldview 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005), 43–44.
See, e.g., William Lane Craig and Paul M. Gould, eds., The Two Tasks of the Christian Scholar (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2007).
We should note that we believe our vision will be consistent with what many Christian thinkers, such as George Marsden and Nicholas Wolterstorff, suggest that we do: interpret and live all of life within the Biblical drama of creation, fall, redemption, and restoration. George Marsden, The Outrageous Idea of Christian Scholarship (New York: Oxford, 1996);
Nicholas Wolterstorff, Educating for Shalom: Essays on Christian Higher Education, eds. Clarence Joldersma and Gloria Stronks (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004). In particular, our vision remains distinct from what Wolterstorff labels, “the Christian humanist model” where the goal is “to induct the student into the great cultural heritage of humanity” (pp. 87, 88). We believe redemptive development would require a more critical interaction and appropriation of that heritage.
E.g., see Harry Lee Poe, Christianity in the Academy (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2004);
Paul J. Dovre, ed., The Future of Religious Colleges (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002);
Robert Benne, Quality with Soul: How Six Premier Colleges and Universities Keep Their Faith with Their Religious Tradition (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002);
Alice Gallin, Negotiating Identity: Catholic Higher Education since 1960 (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2000);
John Wilcox and Irene King, Enhancing Religious Identity: Best Practices from Catholic Campuses (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000);
James T. Burtchaell, The Dying of the Light: The Disengagement of Colleges and Universities from Their Christian Churches (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998);
Richard T. Hughes and William B. Adrian, Models for Christian Higher Education: Strategies for Success in the Twenty-First Century (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1997);
George Marsden, The Soul of American University: From Protestant Establishment to Established No Belief (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994);
and Douglas Sloan, Faith and Knowledge: Mainline Protestantism and American Higher Education (Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox, 1994).
Arthur Holmes, Shaping Character: Moral Education in the Christian College (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1991).
See, e.g., Richard Hays, The Moral Vision of the New Testament: A Contemporary Introduction to New Testament Ethics (San Francisco, CA: Harper, 1996).
Willem Wardekker and Siebren Miedema, “Denominational School Identity and the Formation of Personal Identity,” Religious Education 96.1 (2001): 37.
See Arthur Chickering and Linda Reisser, Education and Identity (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1996).
Erik Erikson, “Identity and the Life Cycle,” Psychological Issues Monograph 1 (1959): 1–171.
See Wardekker and Miedema “Denominational School Identity and the Formation of Personal Identity”; Taylor; Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue (Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press, 1984); and Alasdair MacIntyre, Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry: Encyclopedia, Genealogy, and Tradition (Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield, 1990).
D. A. Snow and R. Machalek, “The Sociology of Conversion,” Annual Review of Sociology 10 (1984): 167–90.
Robert Maynard Hutchins, The Higher Learning in America (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1936), 70–71.
Richard Foster, “Spiritual Formation Agenda,” Christianity Today (January 2009): 31.
Anthony T. Kronman, Education’s End: Why Our Colleges and Universities Have Given Up on the Meaning of Life (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007), 77.
David Smith and Barbara Carvill, The Gift of the Stranger: Faith, Hospitality and Foreign Language Learning (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000), 90.
Frederick Rudolph, Curriculum, A History of the American Undergraduate Course of Study since 1636 (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1977), 1.
William R. Reid, “Curriculum as an Expression of National Identity,” Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 15 (2000): 113–22.
Stanley Hauerwas, Christian Existence Today: Essays on Church, World, and Living in Between (Durham, NC: Labyrinth, 1988), 249.
C. John Sommerville, The Decline of the Secular University (New York: Oxford, 2006), 67.
We also believe there are redemptive ways to tell this story that take into account the contributions of the various communities and histories within the Christian story and their gifts and limitations. See, e.g., Richard T. Hughes, How Christian Faith: Can Sustain the Life of the Mind (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2001).
For more details about our methods and the results see Perry L. Glanzer and Todd Ream, “Whose Story? Which Identity? Fostering Christian Identity at Christian Colleges and Universities,” Christian Scholars Review 35 (2005): 13–27.
John Howard Yoder, The Christian Witness to the State, 2nd ed. (Scottdale, PA: Herald Press, 2001), 13.
Copyright information
© 2009 Perry L. Glanzer and Todd C. Ream
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glanzer, P.L., Ream, T.C. (2009). Christian Humanism and Christ-Centered Education: The Redemptive Development of Humans and Human Creations. In: Christianity and Moral Identity in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101494_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101494_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37728-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10149-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)