Abstract
National Lampoon’s Animal House, a well-known 1978 movie about college life, now appears quite outdated. The reason why has nothing to do with the wild members of the Delta Tau Chi fraternity depicted in the film. For 800 years students have always posed moral challenges to university leaders and these leaders have always grumbled about the moral lives of students. Even from the thirteenth to the fifteenth centuries, Rainer Schwinges tells us university leaders complained:
Students are bawling and brawling, carousing and whoring, singing and dancing, playing cards and chess, are addicted to dice and other games of chance, are up and about town day and night, are swanking around in inappropriate, fashionable clothing, are behaving provocatively to burghers, guild members, and town law-and-order forces, are carrying arms, and are even making use of them.3
Life at American universities proved no different. In 1849, soon after the creation of fraternities, University of Michigan professors complained about this “monster power” that threatened to bring “debauchery, drunkenness, pugilism, dueling … disorder and ravigism.”4 Complaints about the moral conduct of students and the negative influence of their organizations have always existed.
If trees or wild beasts grow, men, believe me, are fashioned …If this fashioning be neglected you have but an animal still.
—Desiderius Erasmus, 15291
We bring all of you here, brim full of needs and desires and hormones, let you loose on each other like so many animals in a wildlife sanctuary and hope for the best.
—Professor Andrew Abbott to the University of Chicago’s Class of 20062
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Desiderius Erasmus, “De Pueris Statim Ac Liberaliter Instituendis Liberllus” [That children should straightaway from their earliest years be trained in virtue and sound learning], in W. H. Woodward, Desiderius Erasmus Concerning the Aim and Method of Education (New York: Teachers College Press, 1964/1529), 187.
Andrew Abbott, “The Aims of Education Address,” University of Chicago Record 37 (2002): 8.
Rainer Schwinges, “Student Education, Student Life,” in A History of the University in Europe, Vol. I, ed. H.D. Ridder-Symeons (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 223.
Helen Lefkowitz Horowitz, Campus Life: Undergraduate Cultures from the End of the Eighteenth Century to the Present (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1987), 39.
Julie Reuben, The Making of the Modern University: Intellectual Transformation and the Marginalization of Morality (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), 211–29.
David Brooks, “The Organizational Kid,” Atlantic Monthly (April 2001): 53.
Harry Lewis, Excellence without a Soul: How a Great University Forgot Education (New York: Public Affairs, 2006), 159–160. Of course, there also exists great disagreement about whether students have souls.
Copyright information
© 2009 Perry L. Glanzer and Todd C. Ream
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glanzer, P.L., Ream, T.C. (2009). Introduction. In: Christianity and Moral Identity in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101494_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101494_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37728-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10149-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)