Abstract
Spanish and other European interests reaffirmed their presence in Cuba after the triumph of the Cuban Revolution. They aimed to maintain the economic relations as well as the political links they had built in the past. But now they encountered a scene that was dominated by a direct confrontation between Castro and the United States. Up to that time, Europeans had learned how to coexist with the overwhelming economic and political hegemony of the United States. Now they were witnessing a standoff with unknown and unpredictable consequences.
The American continents are not to be considered a subject for future colonization by any European power.
James Monroe, 1823
We will oppose, with all our means, the forcible interposition of any power, as auxiliary, stipendiary, or under any other form or pretext, and most especially, [Cuba’s] transfer to any power by conquest, cession, or acquisition in any other way.
Thomas Jefferson, 1823
The policy of the United States towards Cuba has been just waiting for my death. I am not willing to cooperate.
Fidel Castro to a representative of President Jimmy Carter, 1977
All we are saying to these countries is, obey our law.
Senator Jesse Helms, CNN, March 12, 1996
The United States has enacted laws that purport to regulate activities of persons under the jurisdiction of member states of the European Union; this extra-territorial application violates international law and has the adverse effects on the interest of the European Union.
European Union Regulation, November 1996
It is none of your business.
Popular expression, applicable to the European attitude toward U.S. demands on Cuban legislation and foreign investment
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Carmelo Mesa Lago and June S. Belkin, Cuba in Africa (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, 1982).
Jorge Pérez López, “Foreign Direct Investment in Socialist Cuba: Significance and Prospects,” Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 31, no. 4, Winter 1996–97, pp. 3–28; UNCTAD, World Investment Report 1997 (New York: United Nations, 1997), pp. 30–305.
Alistair Hennessy, “Cuba, Western Europe and the U.S.: A Historical Overview,” in Alistair Hennessy and George Lambie (eds.), The Fractured Blockade: West European-Cuban Relations During the Revolution (London: Macmillan, 1993), pp. 11–63.
Kenneth Maxwell, “Joaquín Roy: Cuba, the US and the Helms-Burton Doctrine,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 79, no. 5 (September/October 2000), p. 143.
For one of the most complete legal and economic commentaries on this issue, see Robert Muse’s article, “A Public International Critique of the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction of the Helms-Burton Act (Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (Libertad) Act of 1996),” George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, vol. 30, nos. 2–3 1996–97, pp. 205–270.
Jürgen Huber, “The Helms-Burton Blocking Statute of the European Union,” Fordham International Law Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, 1997, pp. 701, 702, 706.
Horst G. Kenzler and Gunnar Wiegand, “EU-U.S. Relations: More than Trade Disputes?” European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 4 1999, pp. 153–180.
“Senators Urge Albright Not to Grant ILSA Waivers for Libya Projects,” Inside U.S. Trade, May 29, 1998. For a comparative review of the Helms-Burton and ILSA controversies regarding “problem” countries, see the volume edited by Richard N. Haass, Transatlantic Tensions: The United States, Europe, and Problem Countries (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1999).
Copyright information
© 2009 Joaquín Roy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roy, J. (2009). Washington, Havana, Brussels. In: The Cuban Revolution (1959–2009). Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101364_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101364_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38191-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10136-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)