Abstract
This essay examines the development of a field of study, guoxue or National Studies, that commanded much interest and prestige in the academic world of Republican China (1911–1949). The study of Chinese history and classics was traditionally associated with an esteemed genealogy, a gentry-elite background, or channels of upward mobility. In the early twentieth century, this field was profoundly transformed by global exchanges and interactions, and thus acquired new meanings in global contexts. International exchange not only came to constitute an integral part of a broad range of scientific disciplines of foreign provenance, reaching from astronomy to zoology, but even began to influence the study of the Chinese classical tradition. The very notion of a “Chinese national learning” outside of its classical tradition was in fact the result of a global system of knowledge production (Yeh 2006). Thus, the exchanges between various kinds of historical scholarship, in this instance between China, Japan, Europe (particularly France and Germany), and the United States, came to shape the study of China, in China and abroad. As a result, the development of National Studies in China took place within the framework of global academic interactions and was linked to an extended scholarly exchange between intellectuals from different nations for several decades.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barlow, Tani E. 1993. “Colonialism’s Career in Postwar China Studies.” Positions 1(1): 224–267.
Brown, Shana J. 2003. “Pastimes: Scholars, Art Dealers and the Making of Modern Chinese Historiography, 1870–1928.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Brown, Shana J. 2007. “Archives at the Margins: Luo Zhenyu’s Qing Documents and Nationalism in Republican China.” The Politics of Historical Production in Late Qing and Republican China. Ed. Robert Culp and Tze-ki Hon. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. 249–270.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2007. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cohen, P.A. 1984. Discovering History in China: American Historical Writing on the Recent Chinese Past. New York: Columbia University Press.
Crossley, Pamela. 1999. A Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Writing and Difference. Trans. Alan Bass. London & New York: Routledge.
Duara, Prasenjit. 2008. “History and Globalization in China’s Long Twentieth Century.” Modern China 34(1): 152–164.
Farquahr, Judith B., and James L. Hevia. 1993. “Culture and Postwar American Historiography of China.” Positions 1(2): 486–525.
Fitzgerald, John. 1996. Awakening China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Fogel, Joshua A. 2003. “Naito Konan (1866–1934) and Chinese Historiography.” Historiography East and West 1(1): 137–153.
Foucault, M. 1980. The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage Books.
Hevia, J.L. 1995. Cherishing Men from Afar: Qing Guest Ritual and the Macartney Embassy of 1793. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Hon Tze-ki. 1996. “Ethnic and Cultural Pluralism: Gu Jiegang’s Vision of a New China in His Studies of Ancient History.” Modern China 22(3): 315–339.
Hon Tze-ki. 2007. “Educating the Citizens: Visions of China in Late Qing History Textbooks.” In: Hon, Tze-ki, and Robert J. Culp (eds), The Politics of Historical Production in Late Qing and Republican China. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. 79–108.
Huang, Philip C.C. 2000. “Biculturality in Modern China and in Chinese Studies.” Modern China 26(1): 3–31.
Kirby, William C. 2005. “When Did China Become China? Thoughts on the Twentieth Century.” In: Joshua A. Fogel (ed), The Teleology of the Modern Nation-State. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 105–114.
Liu, L.H. 1995. Translingual Practice: Literature, National Culture, and Translated Modernity — China, 1900–1937. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Liu, L.H. 1999. Tokens of Exchange: The Problem of Translation in Global Circulations. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Liu, L.H. 2004. The Clash of Empires:The Lnvention of China in Modern World Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Luo Zhenyu. 1899. “Chongke Zhina tongshi xu.” Zhina tongshi. Trans. Wang Guowei. Shanghai, China: Guangxu Yihaidong. 1b–2b.
Luo Zhenyu. 1999. “Guoxue congkanxu.” Xuetang zixu. Ed. Huang Aimei. Nanjing, China: Jiangsu Renmin. 130–132.
Lust, John. 1968. The Revolutionary Army: A Chinese Nationalist Tract of 1903. Paris: Mouton.
Mühlhahn, Klaus. 2006. “Zwischen Ablehnung und Akzeptanz-Menschenrechte und Geschichte im modernen China.” China aktuell 1: 7–40.
Sang Bing. 1999. Guozue yu Hanxue—Jindai Zhongwai Xuejie Jiaowanlu. Suzhou: Jiangsu Renmin.
Sang Bing. 2001. Wan Qing Minguo de Guoxue Yanjiu. Shanghai, China: Guji.
Schafer, Edward H. 1990. “The Yeh Chung Chi.” T’oungPao 76: 147–207.
Schneider, Laurence. 1976. “National Essence and the New Intelligentsia.” In: Charlotte Furth (ed), The Limits of Change: Essays on Conservative Attitudes in Republican China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Spence, J.D. 1980. To Change China: Western Advisers in China, 1620–1960. Harmondsworth & New York: Penguin Books.
Wang, Edward. 2002. “China’s Search for National Identity.” In: Q. Edward Wang and Georg I. Iggers (eds), Turning Points in Historiography: A Cross-cultural Perspective. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Wang, Q.E. 2001. Inventing China through History: The May Fourth Approach to Historiography. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Xu Guansan. 2003. Xin Shixue jiushi Nian. Changsha, China: Yuelin.
Yeh Wen-hsin. 2006. “National Learning and International Study: Travel and Translation in the Writing of Chinese History.” In: William C. Kirby, Mechthild Leutner, and Klaus Mühlhahn (eds), Global Conjectures: China in Transnational Perspective. Münster, Germany: LIT Verlag.
Zarrow, Peter Gue. 2004. “Historical Trauma: Anti-Manchuism and Memories of Atrocity in Late Qing China.” History & Memory 16(2): 67–107.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2009 Vanessa Künnemann and Ruth Mayer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mühlhahn, K. (2009). National Studies and Global Entanglements: The Reenvisioning of China in the Early Twentieth Century. In: Künnemann, V., Mayer, R. (eds) Trans-Pacific Interactions. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101302_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101302_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38176-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10130-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)