Skip to main content

Textual Hijacks

Between the Book of Isaiah and The Handmaid’s Tale

  • Chapter
Subverting Scriptures
  • 122 Accesses

Abstract

Two texts, one biblical, one futuristic, connect on a poignant image of death and lasting judgment. The verse closes the book of Isaiah, balancing God’s earlier promise of salvation for the faithful with a somber warning of the eternal punishment awaiting the rebellious. The second, an early passage from Margaret Atwood’s dystopian novel The Handmaid’s Tale, details one macabre function of the city wall encircling the Republic of Gilead, an authoritarian theocracy that has taken over the United States of America. The bodies of state criminals are hung a second time on the Wall for public display after a mass execution, or “Salvaging” in Gilead-speak, an event fully state-orchestrated with the enforced participation of Gilead’s inhabitants. The Wall is a chilling, futuristic counterpoint to Isaiah’s dark prophecy: the hooks suspending the dead bodies on the Wall literalize the biblical “worm,” extending the victims’ torture (or “fire”) beyond death so that they remain an “abhorring unto all flesh,” unto the inhabitants of Gilead who have to witness both the process and aftermath of their violent deaths. Read against Isaiah 66:24, the Gileadean Wall realizes in dull but alarming technical detail the violent potential of the verse, otherwise poetically and aesthetically contained by metaphor. The two texts mirror each other in yet another way: the act of looking at the spectacle of violence heavily implicates the spectator in the act of violence.

And they shall go forth, and look upon the carcases of the men that have transgressed against me: for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched; and they shall be an abhorring unto all flesh.

—King James Version, Isaiah 66:24

Now we turn our backs on the church and there is the thing we’ve in truth come to see: the Wall. …

Beside the main gateway there are six more bodies hanging, by the necks, their hands tied in front of them, their heads in white bags tipped sideways onto their shoulders. …

We stop, together as if on signal, and stand and look at the bodies. It doesn’t matter if we look. We’re supposed to look: this is what they are there for, hanging on the Wall. …

What they are hanging from is hooks. The hooks have been set into the brickwork of the Wall, for this purpose. The hooks look like appliances for the armless. Or steel question marks. …

What we are supposed to feel towards these bodies is hatred and scorn.

—Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid’s Tale

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Works Cited

  • Atwood, Margaret. The Handmaid’s Tale. Toronto: Seal, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. “From Work to Text.” Image, Music, Text. Trans. Stephen Heath. London: Fontana/Collins, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlinerblau, Jacques. “Free Will and Determinism in First Isaiah: Secular Hermeneutics, the Poetics of Contingency, and Emile Durheim’s Homo Duplex.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 71.4 (December 2003): 767–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filipczak, Dorota. “Is There No Balm in Gilead?—Biblical Intertext in The Handmaid’s Tale.” Journal of Literature and Theology 7 2 (June 1993): 171–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Barbara. “Writing.” Critical Terms for Literary Study. Ed. Frank Lentricchia and Thomas McLaughlin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990. 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner-Lawlor, Jennifer A. “From Irony to Affiliation in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale” Critique 45.1 (Fall 2003): 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Beth Hawkins Benedix

Copyright information

© 2009 Beth Hawkins Benedix

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tan, Q. (2009). Textual Hijacks. In: Benedix, B.H. (eds) Subverting Scriptures. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101296_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics