Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nationalism as Social Consensus: The Patriotic Brand

  • Chapter
In the Name of the Nation

Abstract

The Kremlin does not utilize the reference to the nation only as an instrument by which to control the political spectrum. It also has a social function, that of creating a twofold consensus: one between citizens themselves, and another between citizens and the political elite. The first consensus is aimed at ending the ideological polarization that threatened Russia at the beginning of the 1990s and at recreating unity in a country that today is extremely divided socially. In fact it appears that there is not one but multiple Russias coexisting on the same territory in heteroclite times and social and cultural worlds: despite reductions in poverty, the social inequalities are widening; the oligarchy lives in a globalized world entirely disconnected from the rest of the country; the aspirations of the middle classes are far removed from the daily preoccupations of the rural population and parts of the provinces; and the national republics and the minorities all see the Russian state in different lights. The second consensus is born of the Kremlin’s primary goal to remobilize a Russian society accustomed to living in an environment divorced from politics. United Russia and the presidential administration are convinced that the political, social, and economic status quo currently in their favor is possible in the long term only if citizens also remobilize, in their daily life, to support the rebirth of Russia as a great power and therefore to support the party that embodies this revival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. On the russification of foreign brands in Russia for commercial purposes, see G. Robert, “Palimpsestes ou âmes mortes? La russification des marques européennes de grande consommation”, La Russie et l’Europe: autres et semblables (Paris: Sorbonne, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. D. Gudkov, “Ethnic Phobias in the Structure of National Identification”, Russian Social Science Review, vol. 39, no. 1 (1998), pp. 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mass Consciousness of the Russians During the Period of Social Transformations: Realities versus Myths (Moscow: Russian Independent Institute of Social and Nationalities Problems, 1996), cited by F. Hill, In Search of Great Russia. Elites, Ideas, Power, the State, and the Pre-Revolutionnary Past in the New Russia, 1991–1996 (Ph.D., Cambridge: Harvard University, 1998), p. 456.

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. Shlapentokh, How Russians See Themselves Now: In the Aftermath of the Defeat in Chechnya (Brussels: NATO, Special Adviser for Central and Eastern European Affairs Brief, December 4, 1995), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. E. Mendelson, T. P. Gerber, “Failing the Stalin Test”, Foreign Affairs, vol. 85, no. 1 (2006), P. 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. White, “Ten Years On, What Do the Russians Think?” Journal of Communist Studies & Transition Politics, vol. 18, no. 1 (2002), pp. 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Munro, “Russia’s Persistent Communist Legacy: Nostalgia, Reaction, and Reactionary Expectations”, Post-Soviet Affairs, vol. 22, no. 4 (2006), p. 292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Among the reference works on this issue are K. Kaariainen, D. Furman, Religioznost’ v Rossii v 90e gody: Starye tserkvi, novye veruiushchie (Saint Petersburg-Mo scow: Letnii Sad, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Agadjanian, “Revising Pandora’s Gifts: Religious and National Identity in the Post-Soviet Societal Fabric”, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 53, no. 3 (2001), pp. 473–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Dubin, “Religion, the Church, and Public Opinion”, Russian Social Science Review, vol. 39, no. 6 (1998), pp. 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Dubin, “Orthodoxy in a Social Context”, Russian Social Science Review, vol. 39, no. 3 (1998), pp. 40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Garrard, C. Garrard, Russian Orthodoxy Resurgent: Faith and Power in the New Russia (Prince ton-Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. E. Bacon, “Church and State in Contemporary Russia: Conflicting Discourses”, in R. Fawn, S. White (eds.), Russia Afier Communism (London-New York: Routledge, 2002), pp. 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. N. Kostiuk, “The Russian Orthodox Church and Society: Moral Cooperation or Ethical Conflict?” Russian Sodal Science Review, vol. 44, no. 4 (2003), pp. 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Marsh, “Orthodox Christianity, Civil Society, and Russian Democracy”, Demokratizatsiya, vol. 13, no. 3 (2005), pp. 449–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Rousselet, “Les enjeux du pluralisme religieux en Russie post-soviétique”, International Journal on Multicultural Societies, vol. 2, no. 2 (2001), pp. 57–77

    Google Scholar 

  17. For more details, see N. Mitrokhin, Russkaia pravoslavnaia tserkov’: sovremennoe sostoianie i aktual’nye prohlemy (Moscow: NLO, 2004), pp. 174–232.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alexander Men (1935–1990) is one of the great figures of Orthodox resistance to the Soviet regime. A fervent supporter of developing closer ecumenical relations with the Western churches, he led clandestine prayer groups and successfully resisted the pressures of the KGB. He was assassinated in 1990, probably by radical nationalists. On his life, see Y. Hamant, Alexander Men, un témoin pour la Russie de ce temps (Paris: Marne, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Morozov, “Chto stoit za kanonizatsiei Nikolaia II?”, Nezavisimaiagazeta, <http://www.ng.ru/ideas/2000-08-12/l_nikolai.html> (accessed April 23, 2009). M. Leeper, The Schism of the Russian Orthodox Church and the Canonization of Nicholas II and the Royal Family (Ph.D., Arlington: University of Texas, 2001), p. 66.

  20. Z. Knox, “Russian Orthodoxy, Russian Nationalism, and Patriarch Aleksii II”, Nationalities Papers, vol. 33, no. 4 (2005), pp. 533–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Verkhovskii, Politicheskoe pravoslavie: Russkie pravoslavnye natsionalisty i fundamentalisty, 1995–2001 (Moscow: S OVA, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Laruelle (ed.), Russkii natsionalizm v politicheskom prostranstve (issledovaniia po natsionalizmu) (Moscow: INION, French-Russian Center for Research in Human and Social Sciences, 2007), pp. 180–199.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Mitrofanova, Politizatsiia “pravoslavnogo mira” (Moscow: Nauka, 2004), pp. 174–188.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Verkhovskii, “Religiia i konstruirovanie rossiiskoi ‘natsional’noi idei’ v nachale novo go veka”, in A. Verkhovskii (ed.), Demokratiia vertikali (Moscow: SOVA, 2006), p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Agadjanian, “Breakthrough to Modernity, Apologia for Traditionalism: The Russian Orthodox View of Society and Culture in Comparative Perspective”, Religion, State & Society, vol. 31, no. 4 (2003), pp. 327–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. V. Chaplin, “Orthodoxy and the Societal Ideal”, in C. Marsh (ed.), Burden or Blessing: Russian Orthodoxy and the Construction of Civil Society and Democracy (Boston: Institute of Religion, Culture and World Affairs, 2004), pp. 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Z. Knox, “The Symphonic Ideal: The Moscow Patriarchate’s Post-Soviet Leadership”, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 55, no. 4 (2003), pp. 575–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Verkhovskii, “Tserkovnyi proekt rossiiskoi identichnosti”, in M. Laruelle (ed.), Sovremen-nye interpretatsii russkogo natsionalizma (Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag, 2007), pp. 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  29. N. K. Gvosdev, “The New Party Card? Orthodoxy and the Search for Post-Soviet Russian Identity”, Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 47, no. 6 (2000), pp. 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  30. K. Rousselet, “L’Église orthodoxe russe et le territoire”, Revue d’études comparatives Est-Ouest, no. 4 (2004), pp. 149-171; Z. Knox, Russian Society and the Orthodox Church: Religion in Russia after Communism (London-New York: Routledge Curzon, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  31. B. Admiraal, “A Religion for the Nation or a Nation for the Religion? Putin’s Third Way for Russia”, in M. Laruelle (ed.), Russian Nationalism and the National Reassertion of Russia (London: Routledge, 2009), pp. 203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  32. I. Papkova, “The Russian Orthodox Church and Political Party Platforms”, Journal of Church and Stats, vol. 49, no. 1 (2007), pp. 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. N. Mitrokhin, Klerikalizatsiia obrazovaniia v Rossii (Moscow: Institut grazhdanskogo analiza, 2005), p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. Agadjanian, “Pluralisme religieux et identité nationale en Russie”, International Journal on Multicultural Societies, vol. 2, no. 2 (2001), p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Sapper, “Povsednevnost’ voinstvennosti v Rossii: nasledie militarizovannogo sotsial-izma”, The Journal of Power Institutions in Post-Soviet Societies, no. 3 (2005), <http://www.pipss.org/document381.htnil>. It should be noted that the Russian army does not appear to be an entity with specific political views. Although its senior members voted more heavily for Ziuganov or Zhirinovski in the first half of 1990s, the army as such shares the same opinions as the civilian population. S. G. Simonsen, “Marching to a Different Drum? Political Orientations and Nationalism in Russia’s Armed Forces”, Communist Studies and Transition Politics, vol. 17, no. 1 (2001), pp. 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. S. A. Tiushkevich, “Mogushchii istochnik patriotizma”, in Patriotizm—odin iz reshaiushchikh faktorov bezopasnosti rossiiskogogosudarstva (Moscow: Ekonomicheskaialiteratura, 2006), p. 280.

    Google Scholar 

  37. V. A. Zolotarev, “Slovo k chitateliam”, in Patriotizm—dukhovnyi sterzhen’ narodov Rossii (Moscow: Ekonomicheskaia lite ratura, 2006), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  38. F. Daucé, L’Etat, l’armée et le citoyen en Russie post-soviétique (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  39. F. Daucé, E. Sieca-Kozlowski, Dedovshchina in the Post-Soviet Military: Hazing of Russian Army Conscripts in a Comparative Perspective (Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  40. V. Sperling, “The Last Refuge of a Scoundrel: Patriotism, Militarism and the Russian National Idea”, Nations and Nationalism, vol. 9, no. 2 (2003), pp. 235–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Z. Barany Democratic Breakdown and the Decline of the Russian Military (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  42. S. L. Webber, “La jeunesse et la sphère militaire en Russie: une zone (dé-)militarisée?”, in A. Le Huérou, E. Sieca-Kozlowski (eds.), Culture militaire et mobilisation patriotique dans la Russie de Vladimir Poutine (Paris: Karthala, 2008), pp. 171–192.

    Google Scholar 

  43. V. Shnirel’man, Intellektual’nye labirinty: ocherki ideologii v sovremennoi Rossii (Moscow: Academia, 2004), pp. 239–241.

    Google Scholar 

  44. B. Beumers, “Myth-making and Myth-taking: Lost Ideals and the War in Contemporary Russian Cinema”, Canadian Slavonic Papers, vol. 42, no. 1-2 (2000), pp. 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. D. Gillespie, “Confronting Imperialism: The Ambivalence of War in Post-Soviet Film”, in S. Webber, J. Mathers (eds.), The Military and Society in Post-Soviet Russia (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005), pp. 80–93.

    Google Scholar 

  46. M. Gabowitsch, Le Spectre du fascisme: Le nationalisme russe et ses adversaires, 19’87-2007 (Ph.D., Paris: EHESS, 2007), pp. 80–122.

    Google Scholar 

  47. B. Dubin, “The Action Thriller (boevik) in Contemporary Russia”, in S. Lovell, B. Menzel (eds.), Reading for Entertainment in Contemporary Russia. Post-Soviet Popular Literature in Historical Perspective (Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner, Arbeiten und texte zur Slavistik, band 78, 2005), pp. 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  48. L. D. Gudkov, “Pobeda v voine: k sotsiologii odnogo natsional’nogo simvola”, in L. D. Gudkov, Negativnaia identichnost’: Stati 1997–2002gg. (Moscow: NLO, 2004), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  49. L. D. Gudkov, “‘Pamiat” o voine i massovaia identichnost’ rossiian”, Pamiat’ o voine 60 let spustia. Rossiia, Germaniia, Evropa (Moscow: NLO, 2005), p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  50. M. Ferretti, La memoria mutilata: la Russia ricorda (Milan: Corbaccio, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  51. E. Thomson, “Discourse, Empire and Memory in Postcommunist Russia”, New Zealand Slavonic Journal, vol. 37 (2003), pp. 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. V. Oskotskii, Polemika: Stalinizm, ksenofobiia i antisemitizm v sovremennoi russkoi literature (Moscow: Academia, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  53. L. D. Gudkov, “Stalin i prochie: Figury vysshei vlasti. v konstruktsii ‘proshlogo’ sovremen-noi Rossii”, in B. Dubin, Zhit’ v Rossii na rubezhe stoletii. Sotsiologicheskie ocherki i razrabotki (Moscow: Progress-Traditsiia, 2007), p. 348.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Marlène Laruelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2009 Marlène Laruelle

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Laruelle, M. (2009). Nationalism as Social Consensus: The Patriotic Brand. In: In the Name of the Nation. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101234_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation