Skip to main content
  • 84 Accesses

Abstract

In 1849 the historian Thomas Macaulay set out to describe the character of the English country gentleman of the later seventeenth century—a man withered by age, “unlettered,” “unpolished,” and genealogy-obsessed, rattling about in his Restoration estate with “old swords and holsters” and a long-overdue pension from the king. Although mindful of his continued patrician status, the ex-cavalier, Macaulay wrote, found himself quite literally marked by the battlefields of Naseby or Marston Moor, which he wore on his body in the form of an eye-patch, a gash on the cheek, or a single bullet still lodged in his head. His scars were not simply scars but royalist badges, just as those who once fought against him bore traces, parliamentary traces, on their own bodies. In this sense, more than any story he could tell, the ex-soldier’s body was itself a record of war-making, though one that was imbued with its own romantic mythology; equally important was the role that disfigurement played in shaping his identity, as he continued to define himself through the prism of the past—a past that was memorialized in his own mutilations.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For other accounts and analyses of soldiers narrating their own wounds, see, for example, Andrew Roy, Fallen Soldier: Memoir of a Civil War Casualty, ed. William J. Miller (1996); Paul Fussell, The Great War and Modern Memory (Oxford, 1975), 243-246, 310-315ff; Joanna Bourke, Dismembering the Male: Men’s Bodies, Britain, and the Great War (Chicago, 1996), chap. five; Richard Tobias, “Don’t Kill the Messenger: Writing History and War,” Critical Quarterly 47 (2005), 106–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Edward Hyde, Earl of Clarendon, The History of the Rebellion and Civil Wars in England (Oxford, 1888), 4: 218.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guy Francis Laking, A Record of European Armour and Arms through Seven Centuries (London, 1920–1922), 2: 242, 244; 5: 45; C. H. Firth, Cromwell’s Army, 4th ed. (1992), 72, 121.

    Google Scholar 

  4. David Randall, “Providence, Fortune, and the Experience of Combat: English Printed Battlefield Reports, circa 1570–1637, Sixteenth Century Journal 35 (2004), 1053–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. for Wiseman, see Michael McVaugh, “Richard Wiseman and the Medical Practitioners of Restoration London,” Journal of the History of Medicine and the Allied Sciences 62 (2006), 125–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Donald Simpson, “Trauma Surgery during the Military Revolution: The Career of Richard Wiseman,” Surgical History 69 (1999), 291–296

    Google Scholar 

  7. Joan Bennett, “An Aspect of the Evolution of Seventeenth-Century Prose,” The Review of English Studies 17 (1941), 281–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hugh Macdonald, “Another Aspect of Seventeenth-Century Prose,” The Review of English Studies 19 (1943), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Henry Foster, “A True and Exact Relation of the Marchings of the Two Regiments of the Trained Bands of the City of London (1643),” in Bibliotheca Gloucesterinsis, ed. James Washbourne (Gloucester, 1828), 1: 267.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Yuval Noah Harari, Renaissance Military Memoirs, 68; see also Paul Delany, British Autobiography in the Seventeenth Century (London, 1969), 116-118; Sharon Alker, “The Soldierly Imagination: Narrating Fear in Defoe’s Memoirs of a Cavalier,” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 19 (2007), 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See John Astington, “Macbeth and the Rowe Illustrations,” Shakespeare Quarterly 49 (1998), 83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. M. Symonds, “The Diary of John Greene,” The English Historical Review 43 (1928), 150, 391.

    Google Scholar 

  13. As J. G. Marston has pointed out, family was also a heavy consideration in the issuance of honor, even if the king was the ultimate source. J. G. Marston, “Gentry Honor and Royalism in Early Stuart England,” Journal of British Studies 13 (1973), 27, 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Susan Clarke, “Royalists Write the Death of Lord Hastings: Post-Regicide Funerary Propaganda, Parergon 22 (2005), esp. 125ff.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. For Lucas and Lisle, see Andrea Brady, “Dying with Honour: Literary Propaganda and the Second English Civil War, Journal of Military History 70 (2006), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nehemiah Wharton, “Letters from a Subaltern Officer of the Earl of Essex’s Army, Written in the Summer and Autumn of 1642,” Archaeologia 35 (1853), 315.

    Google Scholar 

  17. William Haller, “The Word of God in the New Model Army,” Church History 19 (1950), 15–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Timothy George, “War and Peace in the Puritan Tradition,” Church History 53 (1984), 498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hale, “Incitement to Violence? English Divines on the Theme of War, 1578-1631,” in Renaissance War Studies, 487-517; Timothy George, “War and Peace in the Puritan Tradition,” Church History 53 (1984), 492–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Bernard, ed., “Edward Walsingham’s Life of Sir John Digby 1605–1645,” Camden Miscellany 12 (Camden Soc., 3rd ser., 18, 1910), 118–119.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Arthur Fairbanks, “The Conception of the Future Life in Homer,” The American Journal of Theology 1 (1897), 742.]

    Google Scholar 

  22. See, for example, John E. Seaman, “Homeric Parody at the Gates of Milton’s Hell,” The Modern Language Review 62 (1967), 212–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Joan S. Bennett, “God, Satan, and King Charles: Milton’s Royal Portraits,” PMLA 92 (1977), 441–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lawrence W. Hyman and Joan Bennett, “Satan and Charles I,” PMLA 93 (1978), 118–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Blair Worden, “The Politics of Marvell’s Horatian Ode,” The Historical Journal 27 (1984), 525–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. David Quint, “Fear of Falling: Icarus, Phaethon, and Lucretius in Paradise Lost.” Renaissance Quarterly 57 (2004), 847–881.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See Henry Power, “‘Teares breake off my Verse’: The Virgilian Incompleteness of Abraham Cowley’s The Civil War,” Translation and Literature 16 (2007), esp. 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See Geoffrey Hudson, “Negotiating for Blood Money: War Widows and the Courts in Seventeenth-Century England,” in Women, Crime and the Courts in Early Modern England (Raleigh-Durham, 1994), 146-169; and “Arguing Disability: Ex-Servicemen’s Stories in Early Modern England,” in Medicine, Madness and Social History, ed. Roberta Bivins and John Pickstone (London, 2007); Mark Stoyle, “‘Memories of the Maimed’: The Testimony of Charles I’s Former Soldiers, 1660–1730,” History 88 (2003), 208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharon Alker, “The Soldierly Imagination: Narrating Fear in Defoe’s Memoirs of a Cavalier,” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 19 (2007); see also Maximillian E. Novak, “Defoe and the Art of War,” Philological Quarterly 75 (1996), 197–213

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Sarah Covington

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Covington, S. (2009). The Wounds of War. In: Wounds, Flesh, And Metaphor In Seventeenth-Century England. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101098_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics