Skip to main content

Affirmative Action, Civil Rights, and Racial Preferences in the U.S.: Some General Observations

  • Chapter
Book cover Affirmative Action in China and the U.S.

Part of the book series: International and Development Education ((INTDE))

  • 411 Accesses

Abstract

Forty years after being launched by President Lyndon Johnson at the height of the civil rights movement in the 1960s, affirmative action in the United States is in the throes of an acrimonious debate. The upshot is that this innovative public policy is in retreat, severely battered by relentless attacks from an extreme wing of the conservative right and its many allies. Led by White male lawyers, notably Roger Clegg of the provocatively named Center for Equal Opportunity, and his many allies, including high profile African American agent provocateur Ward Connerly of California, these well-organized, anti-affirmative action interest groups have forced elite universities and law schools to abandon practices that overtly strive to ensure some degree of racial diversity on their campuses (discussed later in this essay) and succeeded in passing ballot initiatives in California and Michigan that ban all forms of affirmative action in the public sphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, David W. 1995. Education for Extinction: American Indian Boarding School Experiences, 1875–1928. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, Richard, and Sonia Nazario. 1995. “Affirmative Action. Fairness or Favoritism? How Well Does It work?” Los Angeles Times, September 10: A1, A34-A36.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMott, Benjamin. 1991. “Legally Sanctioned Special Advantages Are A Way of Life in the United States,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, February 27: A40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, W. E. B. 1903. The Souls ofBlack Folk. Chicago: A.C. McClurg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Editorial. 1996. “Bad Law on Affirmative Action,” New York Times, March 22: A14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebel, Sara. 2007. “An Interview with Barack Obama: ‘The Most Important Skill is Knowledge’,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, November 16: A24–A25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu-DeHart, Evelyn. 2004. “An Asian American Perspective on Brown,” in The Unfinished Agenda of Brown v. Board of Education, eds. Black Issues in Higher Education, 108–122. Hoboken: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu-DeHart, Evelyn. 2008. “Asian Americans and Academic Achievement,” unpublished paper available upon request from author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Kevin, and Desda Moss. 1995. “Affirmative Action Debate Skips Women,” USA Today, February 28: A6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katznelson, Ira. 2005. When Affirmative Action was White. An Untold Story of Racial Inequality in Twentieth Century America. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Jonathan. 2008. “Fair Enough? Barack Obama’s Rise Has Americans Debating Whether Affirmative Action Has Run its Course,” The Wall Street Journal, June 14–15: A1 and A8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubin, Alex. 2005. Romance and Rights: The Politics of Interracial Intimacy, 1945–1954. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minzesheimer, Bob. 1995. “Affirmative Action Under Fire,” USA Today, February 23: 4A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, Gunnar. 1944. An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and American Democracy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portales, Marco. 2004. “A History of Latino Segregation Lawsuits,” in The Unfinished Agenda of Brown v. Board of Education, eds. Black Issues in Higher Education, 124–136. Hoboken: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockwell, Paul. 1996. “The GOP Misquotes Martin Luther King,” San Francisco Examine, March 18: A13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Ruth. 1996. “More Than Ever, UC Needs Goodwill,” Los Angeles Times, July 24: B5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, Alexander. 1990. The Rise and Fall of the White Republic. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spann, Girardeau. 2000. The Law of Affirmative Action: Twenty-Five Years of Supreme Court Decisions on Race and Remedies. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, DeWayne. 1995. “Clinton Teeters on High Wire,” USA Today, March 6: A11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, Wilkins. 1995. “Racism Has its Privileges: The Case for Affirmative Action,” The Nation, March 27: 409–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Minglang. 2008. “Models of (Multi)Nation State Building and the Meaning of Being Chinese in Contemporary China,” paper presented at the Critical Han Studies Conference & Workshop, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, April 25–27, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Minglang Zhou Ann Maxwell Hill

Copyright information

© 2009 Minglang Zhou and Ann Maxwell Hill

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hu-DeHart, E. (2009). Affirmative Action, Civil Rights, and Racial Preferences in the U.S.: Some General Observations. In: Zhou, M., Hill, A.M. (eds) Affirmative Action in China and the U.S.. International and Development Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230100923_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics