Advertisement

Abstract

Trade has long been considered a core dimension of international relations. Whether it is a factor of peace or war, favoring or affecting the “Wealth of Nations,” is a question that has been debated for centuries, ever since the mercantilists put in place a protectionist, interventionist, and colonial economic system in the sixteenth century. Adam Smith criticized the mercantilist theory in the eighteenth century, and ever since, classical economics favoring free markets has been dominant. So too has the idea that trade contributes to the pacification of international relations, except for the Marxist tradition that points out the contradictions generated by the expansion of capitalism, and in its modern Latin American version, the dependency of the periphery.

Keywords

Integration Process Regional Integration European Economic Community Critical Juncture Central American Country 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    “The emergence of the Russian and American superpowers created a situation that permitted wider ranging and more effective cooperation among the states of Western Europe. They became consumers of security.” See Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics, Boston, McGraw-Hill, 1979, p. 70.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Ernst Haas, “International Integration: The European and the Universal Process,” International Organization 15(3), Summer 1961.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Ernest Haas and Philippe Schmitter, “Economic and Differential Patterns of Political Integration: Projections about Political Unity in Latin America,” International Organization 18(4), Autumn 1964.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Karl Deutsch, The Analysis of International Frelations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1968.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Ernst Haas, “The Uniting of Europe and the Uniting of Latin America,” Journal of Common Market Studies 5(4), June 1967.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Philippe Schmitter, “Three Neo-functional Hypotheses about International Integration,” International Organization 23(1), Winter 1969, p. 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 9.
    Philippe Schmitter, “A Revised Theory of Regional Integration,” International Organization 24(4), Autumn 1970.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    Philippe Schmitter, “Central American Integration: Spill-over, Spill-around or Encapsulation?” Journal of Common Market Studies 9(1), 1970.Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    Dorette Corbey, “Dialectical Functionalism: Stagnation as a Booster of European Integration,” International Organization 49(2), Spring 1995.Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    Wayne Sandholtz and John Zysman, “1992: Recasting the European Bargain,” World Politics 42(1), October 1989, p. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 15.
    Andrew Moravcsik, “Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community,” International Organization 45(1), Winter 1991.Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    The Federal Republic of Central America lasted from 1824 to 1838. Thomas Karnes mentioned eight tentative reconstructions between 1842 and 1863 (Thomas Karnes, The Failure of Union. Central America, 1824–1960, Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1961).Google Scholar
  13. Felix Fernández-Shaw, La Integración de Centraamérica, Madrid, Ediciones Cultura Hispánica, 1965Google Scholar
  14. Ralph Lee Woodward, Jr., Central America. A Nation Divided, New York, Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  15. 24.
    Joseph Nye, “Central American Regional Integration,” p. 390 in Joseph Nye (ed.), International Fegionalism, Boston, Little, Brown, 1968.Google Scholar
  16. 26.
    Alain Rouquié, “Honduras — El Salvador. La Guerre de Cent Heures: un Cas de ‘Désintégration’ Régionale,” Fevue Française de Science Politique 21(6), December 1971.Google Scholar
  17. 30.
    There are a number of good studies of that period. See, for instance, Nora Hamilton, Jeffry Frieden, Linda Fuller, and Manuel Pastor, Jr. (eds.), Crisis in Central America. Regional Dynamics and U.S. Policy in the 1980s, Boulder, CO, Westview Press, 1988Google Scholar
  18. John Booth and Thomas Walker, Understanding Central America, Boulder, CO, Westview Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  19. 31.
    See Víctor Flores Olea, Relación de Contadora, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1988.Google Scholar
  20. 32.
    See John Booth and Mitchell Seligson (eds.), Elections and Democracy in Central America, Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Olivier Dabène 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olivier Dabène

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations