Skip to main content

Participatory academic research (par) and People’s Participatory Action Research (PAR): Research, Politicization, and Subaltern Social Movements in India

  • Chapter

Abstract

The Adivasi-Dalit Ekta Abhijan (ADEA) is a subaltern1 social movement organization of some twenty-one thousand Kondh Adivasis (original-dwellers) and Panos (scheduled caste group, pejoratively referred to as untouchables as per caste-relegation as impure peoples) people in the southern region of the eastcoast state of Orissa, India. As a movement organization committed to the political activation of predominantly Kondh Adivasi and Panos communities located in more than 120 villages, the ADEA is a contemporary example of popular trans/local activism partially aimed at subaltern dispossession and displacement (material and cultural) by national development and neoliberal globalization (Kapoor, 2004, 2008, 2009) or modernizing socioeconomic processes predicated on the attempted dismemberment of subaltern communities,2 albeit allegedly in their best interests and the greater public good.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baxi, U. (2000). Human rights: Suffering between the movements and markets. In R. Cohen, & S. Rai (Eds.), Global social movements (pp. 33–45). New Brunswick, NJ: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, W. (2006). Marx’s method and the contributions of institutional ethnography. In C. Frampton et al. (Eds.), Sociology for changing the world: Social movements/social research (pp. 232–245). Halifax, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2006). Planet of slums. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debord, G. (1990). Comments on the society of spectacle. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fals-Borda, O. (1979). Investigating reality in order to transform it. Dialectical Anthropology, 4(1), 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feagin, J., & Vera, H. (2001). Liberation sociology. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, W. (2006). Development related displacement and tribal women. In G. Rath (Ed.), Tribal development in India: The contemporary debate. New Delhi, India: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grande, S. (2004). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. (1982). Subaltern studies: Writings on South Asian history and society. New Delhi, India: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. (1979). Knowledge as a commodity and participatory research. Prospects: Quarterly Review of Education, 9(4), 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2004). Popular education and social movements in India: State responses to constructive resistance for social justice in India. Convergence, 37(2), 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2007). Subaltern social movement learning and the decolonization of space in India. International Education, 37(1), 10–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2008). Globalization, dispossession and subaltern social movement (SSM) learning in the South. In A. Abdi, & D. Kapoor (Eds.), Global perspectives on adult education (pp. 100–132). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D (2009). Adivasi (original dwellers) “in the way of” state-corporate development: Development dispossession and learning in social action for land and forests in India. McGill Journal of Education, 44(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman A., & Kleinman, J. (1997). The appeal of experience; the dismay of images: Cultural appropriations of suffering in our times. In A. Kleinman, V. Das, & M. Lock (Eds.), Social Suffering. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier, J. (2005). The environmentalism of the poor: A study of ecological conflicts and valuation. New Delhi: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M. (1985). The theory and practice of participatory action research. In O. Fals Borda (Ed.), The challenge of social change. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal, B. (2004). International law from below: Development, social movements and third world resistance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Dip Kapoor Steven Jordan

Copyright information

© 2009 Dip Kapoor and Steven Jordan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kapoor, D. (2009). Participatory academic research (par) and People’s Participatory Action Research (PAR): Research, Politicization, and Subaltern Social Movements in India. In: Kapoor, D., Jordan, S. (eds) Education, Participatory Action Research, and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230100640_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics