Abstract
Women in Tanzania constitute the majority of smallholder farmers but due to the structure of the rural society and its related customary law, the majority of women have inferior and insecure land rights relative to men (United Republic of Tanzania [URT], 1995). Adult women with children but without a spouse, particularly in rural areas, face the greatest difficulty in handling the land problem. An increasing incidence of unwed mothers, widows, and divorcees makes this problem even more widespread that it has been in the past.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development: Putting the last first. London: Longman.
Chambers, R. (1994). Foreword. In I. Scoones, & J. Thompson (Eds.), Beyond farmer first. London: Intermediate Technology.
Chambers, R. (1995). The professionals and the powerless: Whose reality counts? Choices: The Human Development Magazine, 4(1). New York: United Nations Development Program.
Chambers, R. (1998). Afterword. In J. Holland, & J. Blackburn (Eds.), Whose voice? Participatory research and policy change. London: Intermediate Technology.
Fals-Borda, O., & Rahman, M. (Eds.). (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action-research. New York: Apex Press.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
Horton, M., & Freire, P. (1990). We make the road by walking: Conversation on education and social change. In B. Bell, J. Gaventa, & J. Peters (Eds.), We make the road by walking. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Kabeer, N. (1999). The conditions and consequences of choice: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
Kapoor, D. (2005). NGO partnerships and the taming of the grassroots in rural India. Development in Practice, 15(2), 210–215
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567–605). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart. New York: Routledge.
Maguire, P. (1987). Doing Participatory research—a feminist approach. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Manji, A. (1998). Gender and the politics of the land reform process in Tanzania. Journal of modern studies, 96(4), 645–667.
Mhina, C. H. (2005). Social learning for women’s empowerment in rural Tanzania. Unpublished dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Nyerere J. K. (1979). Adult education and development. In H. Hinzen, & V. H. Hundsdorfer (Eds.), The Tanzanian experience: Education for liberation and development. UNESCO Institute for Education, Hamburg: Evans Brothers London.
Oakley, P. (1991). Projects with people: The practice of participation in rural development. Geneva: International Labor Office.
Park, P. (1993). What is participatory research? A theoretical and methodological perspective. In P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall, & T. Jackson (1993), Voice of change. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
Peters, P. E. (2004). Inequality and social conflict over land in Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change, 4(3), 269–314.
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rahnema, M. (1990). Participatory action research: The “last temptation of saint” development. Alternatives, 15(2), 199–226.
Schumacher, E. E. (1973). Small is beautiful. London: Abacus.
Toulmin, C., & Quan, J. (Eds.). (2000). Evolving land rights, policy and tenure in Africa. London: DFID/IIED/NRI.
UNESCO. (1988). Our creative diversity: Report of the world commission on culture and development. Geneva: Oxford and India Book House.
United Republic of Tanzania [URT]. (1995). Ministry of lands, housing and urban development: The national land policy. Dar-Es-Salaam, Tanzania: Printpak (Tanzania).
Whitehead, A, & Tsikata, D. (2003). Policy discourses on women’s land rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: The implications of the re-turn to the customary. In S. Razavi (Ed.), Agrarian change, gender and land rights (pp. 67–112). Oxford: Blackwell.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2009 Dip Kapoor and Steven Jordan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mhina, C.H. (2009). Research and Agency: The Case of Rural Women and Land Tenure in Tanzania. In: Kapoor, D., Jordan, S. (eds) Education, Participatory Action Research, and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230100640_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230100640_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37883-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10064-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)