Abstract
As globalist euphoria, market triumphalism despite recent vulnerabilities and hypermodernizing political, cultural, educational, and linguistic projects define the dominant accents of this historical juncture, academics and knowledge/pedagogical workers continue to deliberate on our contributions to education, research, and to knowledge processes. More importantly, for those of us who view such engagements as being fundamentally political, we critically assess the import of synergies between research, knowledge, education, and social action in relation to the dominant epistemic conceptions and political-economic interests of our time. Recognizing that all research and socioeducational inquiry begins from a social location and that research being conducted by those who are located with and for power, will produce knowledge useful for the purposes of ruling relations and the reinforcement of existing hierarchies of culture and material existence (for instance, “western empiricism reifies the conventional values legitimating capitalist society” Antonio, 1981, p. 381), it is incumbent on others to democratize and decolonize these constructions (Fanon, 1961; Freire, 1970; Nandy, 1987; Nkrumah, 1964; Smith, 1999) and take a standpoint outside the relations of ruling (Smith, 2005). We need to be clear about whose standpoint we are taking and why, whose questions need to be addressed and what for and then write with responsibility toward those for whom we claim to write.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abrahamsen, R. (2000). Disciplining democracy: Development discourse and good governance in Africa. London: Zed.
Antonio, R. (1981). Immanent critique as the core of critical theory: Its origins and development in Hegel, Marx, and contemporary thought. British Journal of Sociology, 32(3), 325–351.
Barker, J. (2005). Sovereignty matters: Locations of contestation and possibility in indigenous struggles for self-determination. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Baxi, U. (2000). Human rights: Suffering between the movements and markets. In R. Cohen, & S. Rai (Eds.), Global social movements (pp. 33–45). New Brunswick, NJ: Athlone Press.
Bond, P. (2006). Looting Africa: The economics of exploitation. London: Zed.
Chossudovsky, M. (2003). The globalization of poverty: Impacts of IMF and World Bank reforms. New Jersey: Zed.
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed.
Fals-Borda, O. (1979). Investigating reality in order to transform it. Dialectical Anthropology, 4(1), 33–56.
Fals-Borda, O. (1981). The challenge of action research. Development: Seeds of Change, 1, 55–61.
Fais Borda, O., & Rahman, M. (Eds.). (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action-research. New York: Apex Press.
Fanon, F. (1961). Wretched of the earth. New York: Grove Press.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Grande, S. (2004). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Green, M. (2000). Participatory development and the appropriation of agency in Southern Tanzania. Critique of Anthropology, 20(1), 67–89.
Hall, B., Gillette, A., & Tandon, R. (1982). Creating knowledge: A monopoly? New Delhi, India: Society for Participatory Research.
Hamm, B. (2005). Cynical science: Science and truth as cultural imperialism. In B. Hamm, & R. Smandych (Eds.), Cultural imperialism: Essays on the political economy of cultural domination (pp. 60–76). Toronto: Broadview Press.
Jordan, S. (2003). Who stole my methodology: Co-opting PAR. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1 (2), 185–200.
Kamat, S. (2002). Development hegemony: NGOs and the state in India. Delhi: Oxford.
Kane, L. (2000). Popular education and the landless people’s movement in Brazil (MST). Studies in the Education of Adults, 32(1), 36–50.
Kapoor, D. (2008). Globalization, dispossession and subaltern social movement (SSM) learning in the South. In A. Abdi, & D. Kapoor (Eds.), Global perspectives on adult education (pp. 100–132). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kemmis, S., & Smith, (Eds.). (2008). Enabling praxis: Challenges for education. Rotterdam: Sense Publications.
Levidow, R. (2005). Neoliberal agendas for higher education. In A. Saad-Filho, & D. Johnston (Eds.), Neoliberalism: A critical reader (pp. 156–162). London: Pluto.
Mustafa, K. (1981). Participatory research among pastoralist peasants in Tanzania: The experience of the Jipemoyo project in Bagarnoyo district. Mimeographed World Employment Programme Research Report, ILO, Geneva.
Nandy, A. (1987). Traditions, tyranny and utopias: Essays in the politics of awareness. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nandy, A.. (2005). Imperialism as a theory of the future. In B. Hamm, & R. Smandych (Eds.), Cultural imperialism: Essays on the political economy of cultural domination (pp. 52–59). Toronto: Broadview Press.
Nkrumah, K. (1964). Consciencism: Philosophy and ideology for de-colonization. New York: Monthly Review.
Nyerere J. K. (1979). Adult education and development. In H. Hinzen, & V. H. Hundsdorfer (Eds.), The Tanzanian experience: Education for liberation and development. UNESCO Institute for Education, Hamburg: Evans Brothers London.
Petras, J, & Veltmeyer, H. (2001). Globalization unmasked: Imperialism in the 21st century. Halifax, Canada: Fernwood Press.
Polet, F. (2007). The state of resistance: Popular struggles in the global south. London: Pluto.
Rahman, M. (1985). The theory and practice of participatory action research. In O. Fals-Borda (Ed.), The challenge of social change. London: Sage.
Rahnema, M. (1990). Participatory action research: The “last temptation of saint” development. Alternatives, 15(2), 199–226.
Rajagopal, B. (2004). International law from below: Development, social movements and third world resistance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2006). Handbook of action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2007). The Sage handbook of action research: Participation, inquiry and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Reimer, M. (Ed.). (2004). Inside corporate U, Women in the academy speak out. Toronto: Sumach.
Rodney, W. (1982). How Europe underdeveloped Africa. Washington, DC: Howard University Press.
Sears, A. (2003). Re-tooling the mind factory: Education in a lean state. Aurora, ON: Garamond.
Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed.
Smith, D. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Oxford: AltaMira.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2009 Dip Kapoor and Steven Jordan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kapoor, D., Jordan, S. (2009). Introduction: International Perspectives on Education, PAR, and Social Change. In: Kapoor, D., Jordan, S. (eds) Education, Participatory Action Research, and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230100640_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230100640_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37883-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10064-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)