Skip to main content

Abstract

The voracious discourse and deformities of war as an organizer of collective experience took an ominous turn under the administration of George W. Bush. In response to the tragic attacks on September 11, the Bush administration not only made war and preemptive military strikes central to its foreign policy, but it also transformed the discourse of war into a regulatory principle for organizing everyday life. Against the threat of a terrorist attack, the Bush administration unleashed a Manichean imperative that short-circuited thought and gave free rein to the daily mobilization of mass-induced fear, rendering inessential the constitutive mechanisms of politics, particularly deliberative exchange based on reason and evidence, critical debate, shared responsibility, and ethical accountability. The discourse of the post-9/11 Bush administration was hypermasculine in tone and militaristic in response, legitimated in simplistic contrasts between good and evil. Rather than invite deliberation and dialogue, abstract yet powerfully emotive language stifled thinking and squelched dissent. Bush-speak proved a profoundly antipolitical discourse, because it was incapable of imagining—and in fact disdained—a notion of politics based on judgment, meaningful criticism, and multiple public spheres.2

[I]n a time when punitive crime control measures have drastically increased, youth of color experience this hypercriminalization not only from criminal justice institutions but also from non-criminal justice structures traditionally intended to nurture: the school, the family, and the community center. Ultimately, in the era of mass incarceration, a “youth control complex” created by a network of racialized criminalization and punishment deployed from various institutions of control and socialization has formed to manage, control, and incapacitate black and Latino youth.

—Victor M. Rios, “The Hypercriminalization of Black and Latino Male Youth in the Era of Mass Incarceration”1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Richard J. Bernstein, The Abuse of Evil: The Corruption of Politics and Religion Since 9/11 (London: Polity Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, James K. Galbraith, The Predator State (New York: Free Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009), p. 331.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Glenn Greenwald, How Would a Patriot Act? Defending American Values from a President Run Amok (New York: Working Assets Publishing, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See the stinging critique and condemnation of the use of torture sanctioned by politicians at the highest level of the Bush administration in Editorial, “The Torture Report,” New York Times (December 18, 2008), p. A34; see also Jane Mayer, The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals (New York: Doubleday, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  6. The rise of the warfare state has been well documented. See Andrew Bacevich, The Limits of Power (New York: Metropolitan, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Norman Solomon, Made Love, Got War: Close Encounters with America’s Warfare State (New York: Polipoint Press, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robert Higgs, Resurgence of the Warfare State: The Crisis Since 9/11 (Washington, DC: The Independent Institute, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Henry A. Giroux, The University in Chains: Confronting the Military-Industrial-Academic Complex (Boulder: Paradigm, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chalmers Johnson, Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic (New York: Metropolitan, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Andrew Bacevich, The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced by War (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  12. For an insightful commentary on the Bush administration’s war against constitutional rights, see Greenwald, How Would a Patriot Act?; Philippe Sands, Torture Team: Deception, Cruelty and the Compromise of Law (New York: Allan Lane, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Of course, there are some notable exceptions. See Jerome Miller, Search and Destroy: African-American Males in the Criminal Justice System (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. David Cole, No Equal Justice: Race and Class in the American Criminal Justice System (New York: The New Press, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Michael Parenti, Lockdown America: Police and Prisons in the Age of Crisis (London: Verso, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marc Mauer, Race to Incarcerate (New York: The New Press, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marc Mauer and Meda Chesney-Lind, Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Consequences of Mass Imprisonment (New York: The New Press, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. David Garland, The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Mary Pattilo, David Weiman, and Bruce Western, eds, Imprisoning America (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Angela Y. Davis, Abolition Democracy: Beyond Empire, Prisons, and Torture (New York: Seven Stories Press, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ruth Wilson Gilmore, Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Manning Marable, Ian Steinberg, and Keesha Middlemass, eds, Racializing Justice, Disenfranchising Lives (New York: Palgrave, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bruce Western, Punishment and Inequality in America (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  24. I take this up in Henry A. Giroux, Fugitive Cultures: Race, Violence, and Youth (New York: Routledge, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cited in Lawrence Grossberg, Caught in the Crossfire: Kids, Politics, and America’s Future (Boulder: Paradigm Publishers, 2005), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Linda S. Beres and Thomas D. Griffith, “Demonizing Youth,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 34 (January 2001), p. 747.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jean Comaroff and John Comaroff, “Reflections of Youth, from the Past to the Postcolony,” in Frontiers of Capital: Ethnographic Reflections on the New Economy, ed. Melissa S. Fisher and Greg Downey (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006), p. 267.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Garland, The Culture of Control; and Jonathan Simon, Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Phil Scranton, Power, Conflict and Criminalisation (New York: Routledge, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  30. For a brilliant analysis of the racist state, see David Theo Goldberg, The Racial State (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zygmunt Bauman, Consuming Life (London: Polity Press, 2007), pp. 126, 128.

    Google Scholar 

  32. This issue is taken up in a number of important books. See Christopher Robbins, Expelling Hope (Albany: SUNY Press, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Valerie Polakow, Who Cares for Our Children (New York: Teachers College Press, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  34. William Lyons and Julie Drew, Punishing Schools: Fear and Citizenship in American Public Education (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Valerie Polakow, ed., The Public Assault on America’s Children: Poverty. Violence, and Juvenile Justice (New York: Teachers College Press, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  36. William Ayers, A Kind and Just Parent (Boston: Beacon Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  37. I have argued that the prison-industrial complex has to be analyzed within the rise of a new mode of authoritarianism that emerged under the Bush-Cheney administration. See Henry A. Giroux, Against the Terror of Neoliberalism (Boulder: Paradigm Publishers, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sheldon S. Wolin, Democracy Inc.: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  39. On the issue of the racial biopolitics of neoliberalism, war, violence, authoritarianism, and everyday life, see Leerom Medovoi, “Global Society Must Be Defended: Biopolitics Without Boundaries,” Social Text 25:2 (Summer 2007), pp. 53–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jonathan Michael Feldman, “From Warfare State to ‘Shadow State,’” Social Text 25:2 (Summer 2007), pp. 143–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nikhil Singh, “The Afterlife of Fascim,” South Atlantic Quarterly 105:1 (Winter 2006), pp. 71–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Stephen John Hartnett and Laura Ann Stengrim, “War Rhetorics,” South Atlantic Quarterly 105:1 (Winter 2006), pp. 175–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. David Clark, “Schelling’s Wartime: Philosophy and Violence in the Age of Napoleon,” European Romantic Review 19:2 (April 2008), pp. 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Michel Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979 (New York: Palgrave, 2008), p. 323.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Zygmunt Bauman, Wasted Lives (London: Polity Press, 2004), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  46. See, for example, Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire (New York: Penguin, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jennifer Warren, One in 100: Behind Bars in America 2008 (Washington, DC: The PEW Center on the States, 2007), pp. 3

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jason DeParle, “The American Prison Nightmare,” New York Review of Books 54:6 (April 12, 2007), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Paul Street, Segregated Schools: Educational Apartheid in Post-Civil Rights America (New York: Routledge, 2005), p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pew Center on the States, One in 31:The Long Reach of American Corrections (Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts, March 2009). p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Under such conditions, as Derrida points out, the Arab became the “ultimate figure of exclusion and dissidence in the post-9/11 era.” See Giovanna Borradori, “Foreword,” in Mustapha Cherif, Islam and the West: A Conversation with Jacques Derrida (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008), p. x.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Douglas Kellner, Guys and Guns Amok: Domestic Terrorism and School Shootings from the Oklahoma City Bombing to the Virginia Tech Massacre (Boulder: Paradigm Publishers, 2008), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  53. On the dark side of the war on terror and the politics of torture, see Philippe Sands, Torture Team: Deception, Cruelty and the Compromise of Law (New York: Allan Lane, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lindsay Beyerstein Majikthise, “Congress Probes Child Abuse Under Guise of Treatment,” AlterNet (May 7, 2008). Online: http://www.alternet.org/bloggers/majikthise.typead.com/84572/. For an in-depth analysis of the tough-love industry aimed at children, see Maia Szalavitz, Help at Any Cost: How the Troubled-Teen Industry Cons Parents and Hurts Kids (New York: Riverside, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Children’s Defense Fund, 2008 Annual Report (Washington, DC: Children’s Defense Fund, 2009). Online: http://www.childrens-defense.org/child-research-data-publications/data/state-of-americas-children-2008-report.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Randall R. Beger, “Expansion of Police Power in Public Schools and the Vanishing Rights of Students,” Social Justice 29:1 (2002), p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  57. The best book analyzing all aspects of zero tolerance policies is Robbins, Expelling Hope. See also William Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, and Rick Ayers, eds., Zero Tolerance (New York: The New Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Elora Mukherjee, Criminalizing the Classroom: The Over-Policing of New York City Schools (New York: American Civil Liberties Union and New York Civil Liberties, March 2008), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  59. For a superb analysis of urban marginality of youth in the United States and France, see Loic Wacquant, Urban Outcasts (London: Polity Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Children’s Defense Fund, America’s Cradle to Prison Pipeline (Washington, DC: Children’s Defense Fund, 2008), p. 77. Online: http://www.childrensdefense.org/site/DocServer/CDF_annual_report_07.pdf?docID=8421.

    Google Scholar 

  61. For a moving and insightful book on incarcerating kids, see William Ayers, A Kind and Just Parent (Boston: Beacon Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Annie E. Casey Foundation, “A Road Map for Juvenile Justice Reform,” in 2008 Kids Count Data Book (Baltimore: Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2008). Online: http://www.aecf.org/~/media/PublicationFiles/AEC180essay_booklet_MECH.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  63. David Tanenhaus, Juvenile Justice in the Making (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Henry A. Giroux

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giroux, H.A. (2009). Locked Up: Education and the Youth Crime Complex. In: Youth in a Suspect Society: Democracy or Disposability?. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230100565_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics