Advertisement

Does Participation Matter? Effective Authoritarianism in New Order Indonesia

Chapter
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

Unlike the other cases in this book, Suharto’s New Order regime severely restricted political participation while attempting to ensure law and order and providing a high level of education and poverty relief. Thus, this case presents an alternative strategy and begs the question of whether participation really matters. If states seek to positively influence Islamist group mobilization strategies, does effectiveness matter more than institutional inclusion? Are Islamist groups that eschew violence only responding to material and coercive incentives? This chapter highlights the shortcomings of the effective authoritarian model, the importance of political access, and the consequences of limiting political participation.

Keywords

Islamic Bank Muslim World Muslim Brotherhood Islamic State Study Circle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Fealy, Greg, and Platzdach, Bernhard, “The Masyumi Legacy: Between Islamist Idealism and Political Exigency,” Studia Islamika 12, no.1 (2005): 81. This does not imply that all of these organizations were closely tied to Masyumi. Some were closer than others. For example, the HMI had members in both NU and Masyumi. However, the streams of thought were present, and members of these organizations tended to support Masyumi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 3.
    Van Bruinessen, Martin, “Genealogies of Islamic Radicalism in Post-Suharto Indonesia,” Southeast Asia Research 10, no. 2 (2002): 118.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    International Crisis Group, “Al-Qaeda in Southeast Asia: The Case of the Ngruki Network,” Indonesia Briefing, Jakarta/Brussels, August 8, 2002, 6.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Hefner, Robert, Civil Islam (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000), 98–99.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    Juoro, Umar, “Indonesia,” in Political Party Systems and Democratic Development in East and Southeast Asia, vol. 1. Southeast Asia, eds. Wolfgang Sachsenroder and Ulrike Frings (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998), 214.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Liddle, R. William, “The Islamic Turn in Indonesia: A Political Explanation,” Journal of Asian Studies 55, no. 3 (1996): 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 12.
    Effendy, Bahtiar, Islam and the State in Indonesia (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2003), 49.Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    Barton, Greg, Jemaah Islamiyah: Radical Islamism in Indonesia (Singapore: Ridge Books, 2005), 89.Google Scholar
  9. 18.
    Van Bruinessen, Martin, “Islamic State or State Islam? Fifty Years of State-Islam Relations in Indonesia, in Ingrid Wessel (Hrsg.), Indonesien am Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts (Hamburg: Abera-Verlag, 1996), 19–34.Google Scholar
  10. 21.
    Porter, Donald, Managing Politics and Islam in Indonesia (London: Routledge, 2002), 76.Google Scholar
  11. 22.
    Hamayotsu, Kikue, “Islam and Nation Building in Southeast Asia: Malaysia and Indonesia in Comparative Perspective,” Pacific Affairs 75, no. 3 (Fall 2002): 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 28.
    Abdurrahman Wahid, former chairman of Nahdlatul Ulama and former president of Indonesia, quoted in Ramage, Douglas, Politics in Indonesia: Democracy, Islam and the Ideology of Tolerance (London: Routledge, 1995), 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 35.
    International Crisis Group. “Al Qaeda in Southeast Asia: The Case of the ‘Ngruki Network’ in Indonesia.” ICG Indonesia Briefing, August 8, 2002, 10.Google Scholar
  14. 36.
    Amnesty International, “Indonesia: Imprisonment of Usroh Activists in Central Java.” Report, October 1986, 2.Google Scholar
  15. 37.
    Van Bruinessen, Martin, “The Violent Fringes of Indonesia’s Radical Islam.” Background information after the Bali Bombing of October 2002. Extended version of article published in ISIM Newsletter11 (December 2002): 9, www.let.uu.nl/~martin.vanbruinessen/personal/publications/violent_fringe.htm (accessed on July 30, 2006). Machmudi, Yon, “Islamizing Indonesia” (PhD diss., Australia National University, 2006), 118.Google Scholar
  16. 39.
    Schwarz, Adam, A Nation in Waiting: Indonesia’s Search for Stability (NSW: Allen & Unwin, 2004), 174.Google Scholar
  17. 51.
    Robinson, Richard, and Hadiz, Vedi R, Reorganizing Power in Indonesia (London: Routledge, 2004), 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 61.
    O’Rourke, Kevin, Reformasi: The Struggle for Power in Post-Suharto Indonesia (Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin, 2002), 9.Google Scholar
  19. 67.
    Collins, Elizabeth Fuller, “Indonesia: A Violent Culture,” Asian Survey vol. 42, no. 4 (July–August 2002): 584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 73.
    Conboy, Ken, The Second Front: Inside Asia’s Most Dangerous Terrorist Network (Jakarta: Equinox, 2006), 153.Google Scholar
  21. 76.
    Suryadinata, Leo, Elections and Politics in Indonesia (Singapore: Institute for Southeast Asian Studies, 2002), 60.Google Scholar
  22. 80.
    Sidel, John, Riots, Pogroms, Jihad: Religious Violence in Indonesia (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006), 55.Google Scholar
  23. 81.
    Ibid., 56, and Aspinall Opposing Suharto: Compromise, Resistance, and Regime Change in Indonesia (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005), 66.Google Scholar
  24. 82.
    Friend, Theodore, Indonesian Destinies (Cambridge: Belknap Press, 2003), 190.Google Scholar
  25. 84.
    Bresnan, John, Managing Indonesia: The Modern Political Economy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), 223–224.Google Scholar
  26. 95.
    Bertrand, Jacques, Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Indonesia (United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 101, and Sidel, Riots, Pogroms, Jihad, 84.Google Scholar
  27. 98.
    Liddle, R. William, Leadership and Culture in Indonesian Politics (Sidney: ASAA Southeast Asia Publication Series of Allen and Unwin, 1996), 6.Google Scholar
  28. 111.
    Pohl, Florian, “Pesantren and Global Integration” (paper presented at informal talk held at the Center for Religion and Cross-Cultural Studies, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, May 6, 2006, 4).Google Scholar
  29. 112.
    Thomas, Murray R, “The Islamic Revival and Indonesian Education,” Asian Survey 28, no. 9 (September 1998): 903.Google Scholar
  30. 114.
    Hefner, Robert, “Islamization and Democratization in Indonesia,” in Southeast Asia in the New International Era, eds. Robert Hefner and Patricia Horavitch (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press 1997), 88, and Van Bruinessen, Martin, “Traditionalist and Islamist Pesantren in Contemporary Indonesia (paper presented at the ISIM workshop on “The Madrasa in Asia,” Leiden, Netherlands, May 23–24, 2004, 6).Google Scholar
  31. 115.
    Statistics provided by Education Management Information Systems (EMIS). Yunanto, S., and Badrudin, Harun, “Terminology, History, and Categorization,” in Islamic Education in South and Southeast Asia: Diversity, Problems and Strategy, eds. S. Yunanto et al (Jakarta: Ridep Institute, 2007), 30. Other organizations such as the DDII, the LDI, and Persis also ran smaller networks of Islamic boarding schools, to supplement state efforts. However, these groups account for .43 percent, .18 percent, and.50 percent, respectively, and thus do not play a significant supplemental role compared to NU or Muhammadiyah.Google Scholar
  32. 116.
    Feillard, Andree, “Traditionalist Islam and the State in Indonesia: The Road to Legitimacy and Renewal,” in Islam and the Era of Nation-States, eds. Robert Hefner and Patricia Horavitch (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1997), 141–142.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Julie Chernov Hwang 2009

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations