Skip to main content

Agricultural Trade Liberalization

  • Chapter
The Economics of European Agriculture

Abstract

As was seen in the previous chapter, agriculture is still of particular significance to the EU, as it is the major importer and the second largest exporter of food products in the world. Consequently, the EU is a very prominent and vocal member of what is today known as the World Trade Organization (WTO). Successful rounds of multilateral trade negotiations in the past have led to a decrease in the level of protection facing developing as well as developed countries. The situation of the agricultural sector, where protection in the developed countries grew enormously in relative terms until the mid-1980s, is generally in contrast with a background of falling tariffs experienced in the manu-facturing sector. Indeed, average tariff levels on manufacturing products have decreased from 40 to 50 per cent of the import value in 1950 to an average of 3.9 per cent in the 1990s. Thanks to the last round of multi-lateral negotiations, the Uruguay Round (UR), average tariffs on fish products declined by more than a quarter (Senti and Conlan, 1998).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Abbott, P.C. (2002) ‘Tariff-rate quotas: Failed market access instruments?’, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 29: 1, 1st quarter, 109–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackrill, R. (2000) The Common Agricultural Policy (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. and Josling, T. (1993) The Challenges to Economists of Multilateral Trade Negotiations on Agricultural Protection (Food Research Institute Studies, Vol. XXII, No. 3, 275–304).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudin, P. (1991) ‘La fixation des prix agricoles pour 1991/1992’, Revue du Marché Commun et de l’Union Européenne, No. 349, Juillet/Aout, 535–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balassa (1988) ‘Agricultural policies and international resource allocation’, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 15: 2/3, 159–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byé, M. (1950) ‘Unions douanières et données nationales’, Economie Appliquée, Janvier–Mars, 121–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1991) The Development and Future of the Common Agricultural Policy — Proposals of the Commission, COM (91) 100 final, 1 February, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1992) Volet agricole de la négociation Gatt et réforme de la PAC (Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Communication CEC (92) 2267 final).

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1994) The Economics of the Common Agricultural Policy European Economy No. 5 (Brussels/Luxembourg).

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2001, 2002) The Agricultural Situation in the European Union 1999 and 2000 Reports (Brussels and Luxemburg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Charvet, J.P. (1997) La France Agricole — Dans son Environnement Européen et Mondial (Editions Lids: Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D.P. (1998) ‘Are poorer developing countries the targets of US protectionist actions?’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47: 1, 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corden, W.M. (1972) ‘Economies of scale and customs union theory’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 80, 465–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economic Strategy Institute (1992) The Uruguay Round and the United States: A Critical Analysis. ESI, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwell, C. and Reifman, A. (1993) The Uruguay Round — A Macroeconomic Assessment, June 1, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROSTAT (2002) Yearbook 2002 — The Statistical Guide to Europe (Brussels and Luxembourg).

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2002) World Food Summit — Five Years Later. Food Agricultural Organization: Rome, 10–13 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • GATT (1952) Basic Instruments and Selected Documents. Vol. I, Part III, Article XXIV, Section 8(a), Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giersch, H. (1949/50) ‘Economic union between nations and the location of industries’, Review of Economic Studies, No. 2, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowland, D. and James, S. (eds) (1991) Economic Policy after 1992 (Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyomard, H., Mahé, L.P., Munk, K. and Roe, T. (1993) Agriculture in the Uruguay Round - ambitions and realities. CEC Economic Papers, No. 101, March, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henson, S. and Loader, R. (2001) ‘Barriers to agricultural exports from developing countries: the role of sanitary and phytosanitary requirements’, World Development, 29: 1, 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. (1997) ‘Food Insecurity as a Sustainability Issue: lessons from Honduran Maize Farming’, in J.P. de Groot and R. Ruben (eds) Sustainable Agriculture in Central America (New York: MacMillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Killick, T. (2001) ‘Globalization and the rural poor’, Development Policy Review, 19: 2, 155–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P.L. and Atici, C. (1998) ‘A sectoral analysis of agricultural trade liberalization’, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 30: 2, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger Anne, O., Schiff, M. and Valdés, A. (1988) ‘Agricultural incentives in developing countries: measuring the effect of sectoral and economywide policies’, World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 2, No. 3, 255–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Monde (1992) Wednesday 25 November 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahé, L.P. and Tavéra (1989) ‘Bilateral harmonization of EC and US agricultural policies’, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 15, 327–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahé, L.P. (1997) ‘Environment and quality standards in the WTO: New protectionism in agricultural trade? A European perspective’, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 29: 3/4, 3rd and 4th Quarter, 480–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, A. (2001) ‘Developing countries’ position in WTO agricultural trade negotiations’, Development Policy Review, 20: 1, 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1995) Agricultural Policies, Markets and Trade in OECD Countries — Monitoring and Outlook. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1999) Post-Uruguay Round Tariff Regimes — Achievements and Outlook. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OJEC (1992) L180 and L181, 1 July, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, S. and Hewitt, A. (2002) ‘The new European trade preferences: does ’Everything But Arms’ (EBA) help the poor?’, Development Policy Review, 20: 1, 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roningen, V.O. and Dixit, P. (1989) Economic Implications of Agricultural Policy Reform in Industrial Market Economies (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Senti, R. and Conlan, P. (1998) WTO — Regulation of World Trade after the Uruguay Round (Zürich: Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy, S.J. (1995/96) ‘Options for CAP Reform in the next trade round — with special reference to milk’, Proceedings of the Agricultural Economics Society of Ireland 111–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, I.M. (2002) ‘Regulation of biotechnology: will we ever “freely” trade GMOs?’, European Review of Agricultural Economics 1st quarter, 29: 1, 155–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinbank, A. (1999) ‘CAP reform and the WTO: compatibility and develop-ments’, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 26: 3, 289–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USTR (1990) Office of the United States Trade Representative. October, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdis, A. and Zietz, J. (1980) Agricultural Protection in OECD Countries: Its cost to Less-Developed Countries, International Food Policy Research Institute, Research Report 21, Washington DC: IFPRI, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viner, J. (1950) The Customs Union Issue (New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank and OECD (1993) Trade Liberalization: Global Economic Implications. 26 September (Washington and Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeats, A. (1981) ‘The influence of trade and commercial barriers on the industrial processing of natural resources’, World Development Report, 9, 485–94 (Washington: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Bernadette Andreosso-O’Callaghan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andreosso-O’Callaghan, B. (2003). Agricultural Trade Liberalization. In: The Economics of European Agriculture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230001176_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics