Skip to main content
  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

Only one African state, Libya, has featured among our seven principal case studies of deviant countries. Of course many more African states merit examination. It is especially in the area of human rights that scores of them were guilty of rule-breaking behaviour. In the World Democracy Audit released in 2002, only two African states – Mauritius and South Africa – were among the 34 unquestionably free countries in the world. Five more African states, including Botswana, Mali and Ghana, were classified as ‘free but with a distance to go’. All remaining African countries (with populations exceeding one million) were placed in the ‘unfree’ category.1 Despite their persistently poor human rights records, few African states have been condemned to true deviant status. One reason is that among African leaders considerations of sovereignty and solidarity have traditionally taken precedence over concern with human suffering in fellow African countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 Deon Geldenhuys

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Geldenhuys, D. (2004). Additional African States. In: Deviant Conduct in World Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000711_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics