Abstract
Various terms have been used to characterise novel forms of social organisation that developed in the late 20th century; including ‘network society’, ‘disorganised capitalism’, ‘lean production’, ‘flexible specialisation’ and ‘post-Fordism’. Again these are often thought to have strongly negative outcomes for labour. There are significant conceptual differences between the diverse accounts, with some writers, for example, using the term neo-Fordism to emphasise elements of continuity with previous practices. Nevertheless, most writers describe a transformation of relations between production and consumption and both between and within firms. New information technologies transform work and also break the link between size and efficiency, so production can be rapidly switched to meet customers’ changing needs. The giant corporations decline, superseded by networks of smaller firms as agents of innovation and growth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Bill Dunn
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dunn, B. (2004). Post-Fordism: The Social Dispersal of Labour?. In: Global Restructuring and the Power of Labour. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000667_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000667_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51621-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-00066-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)