Abstract
The second strand of the elected Parliament’s initial approach was to press for institutional reform within the existing treaties. As we saw at the beginning of the previous chapter, treaty revision was not initially seen as a realistic or attractive option. On the other hand, the prospect for institutional reform within the treaties, notably by means of interinstitutional agreements, was held to be possible, with MEPs looking to the precedents of the Joint Declaration with the Council and the Commission on the Conciliation Procedure (see chapter 4) and the ‘LunsWesterterp procedures’ whereby Council had agreed to involve Parliament more closely in discussions on international agreements with third countries.1 As explained by Klaus Hänsch:
‘It is a realistic [approach] confined to what can he done up to 1984, the year of the second direct elections. … We must be able to show that we have actually achieved something … The Treaty could not be amended by 1984, even if that was what was wanted, because the time is too short.2
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1998 Richard Corbett
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Corbett, R. (1998). Reform within the Treaties. In: The European Parliament’s Role in Closer EU Integration. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-4039-2000-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-4039-2000-3_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-94938-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-2000-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)