Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Gendered Agency in War and Peace

Part of the book series: Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies ((RCS))

  • 574 Accesses

Abstract

The final chapter draws out the key conclusions of this study, and highlights how women in Bosnia are working to expand the boundaries of post-conflict justice through forms of activism that centre on the question of “dealing with the past”. Transitional justice processes are foregrounded as crucial sites of gendered agency. These processes offer opportunities for women to challenge or alternatively reinforce gender hierarchies and norms by engaging in post-war struggles over justice. The chapter also presents several recommendations for advancing gender justice in (post-)conflict contexts. It highlights how processes of “dealing with the past” might be re-envisioned to provide forms of justice that address the interests, needs, desires, and expectations of women affected by armed conflict in Bosnia and other (post)conflict settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This point was identified in dialogue with Laura McLeod. The few studies which do operate at the intersection between Critical and F eminist Peace and Conflict Studies include McLeod (2015); O’Reilly (2012).

  2. 2.

    Azra Hasanbegović, Žene BiH, Personal Interview, Mostar, 12/10/11.

  3. 3.

    Ferida Nišić, Treasurer of Association for Tracing Captured and Missing from Hadžići, Personal Interview, Hadžići, 28/06/11.

  4. 4.

    Senka Zulum, Viktorija 99, Personal Interview, Jajce, 08/06/11.

  5. 5.

    Mejra Dautović, Personal Interview, Bihać, 24/04/12.

  6. 6.

    As Madho k and Rai (2012) have pointed out in their study of a state-sponsored initiative for women’s development in Northwest India, women’s mobilisation for “transgressive politics” can involve exposure to vulnerability, risk, and injury.

  7. 7.

    As Aleksandra Petrić explained, issues that are not associated with national identity are not recognised as a priority by politicians.

    Aleksandra Petrić, Program Director of United Women, Personal Interview, Banja Luka, 2/09/11.

  8. 8.

    Examples include establishing women’s hearings, dedicated gender units, gender quotas for commissioners and staff, and specialised witness protection and support; building partnerships with local and internationa l women’s organisations; and constructing “gender-responsive” mandates that are inclusive of women and sensitive to gender-based violence (Theidon 2007: 457; Valji 2010: 9–13).

  9. 9.

    Women’s organisations have organised dozens of women’s courts and tribunals across the world, with themes ranging from sexual violence, to human trafficking, and the rights of indigenous women. Key examples include the Women’s International War Crimes Tribunal on Japan’s Military Sexual Slavery (Tokyo, 2000); and the Global Tribunal on Violations of Women’s Human Rights (Vienna, 1993).

Bibliography

  • Valerie Arnould, ‘Transitional Justice in Peacebuilding: Dynamics of Contestation in the DRC,’ Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2016, pp. 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly Dawn Askin, War Crimes Against Women: Prosecution in International War Crimes Tribunals, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesna Bojicic-Dzelilovic, James Ker-Lindsay and Denisa Kostovicova, eds., Civil Society and Transitions in theWestern Balkans, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susanne Buckley-Zistel and Ruth Stanley, eds., Gender in Transitional Justice, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsten Campbell, ‘Gender Justice Beyond the Tribunals: From Criminal Accountability to Transformative Justice,’ AJIL, 110, 2016, pp. 227–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Christine Chinkin, ‘People’s Tribunals: Legitimate or Rough Justice,’ Windsor Yearbook Access to Justice, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2006, pp. 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christine Chinkin and Kate Paradine, ‘Vision and Reality: Democracy and Citizenship of Women in the Dayton Peace Accords,’ Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 26, 2001, pp. 103–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Cynthia Cockburn, The Space Between Us: Negotiating Gender and National Identities in Conflict, London: Zed Books, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Alison Crosby and M. Brinton Lykes, ‘Mayan Women Survivors Speak: The Gendered Relations of Truth Telling in Postwar Guatemala,’ International Journal of Transitional Justice, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2011, pp. 456–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanya L. Domi, ‘Advancing Women’s Political Rights in Bosnia-Herzegovina,’ The Harriman Review, Vol. 14, Nos. 1–2, 2002, pp. 36–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Colleen Duggan and Ruth Jacobson, “Reparation of Sexual and Reproductive Violence: Moving from Codification to Implementation” in Ruth Rubio-Marín, ed., The Gender of Reparations: Unsettling Sexual Hierarchies While Redressing Human Rights Violations, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 121–161

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Azra Hasanbegović and Aldijana Trbonja, Dijagnostički Izvještaj: Pomoć pri izgradnjia mira kroz implementaicju Rezolucije UNSCR 1325 na području Balkana, Mostar: M.Z.C. Mostar and Žena BiH Mostar, 2009 (Diagnostic Report: Help to Build Peace Through the Implementation of Resolution UNSCR 1325)

    Google Scholar 

  • Priscilla Hayner, Unspeakable Truths: Confronting State Terror and Atrocity, New York: Routledge, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidi Hudson, ‘A Double-edged Sword of Peace? Reflections on the Tension Between Representation and Protection in Gendering Liberal Peacebuilding,’ International Peacekeeping, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2012, pp. 443–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Tami Jacoby, ‘From the Trenches: Dilemmas of Feminist IR Fieldwork,’ in Brooke A. Ackerly, Maria Stern and Jacqui True, Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 154–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Corinne Kumar, The World Court of Women Against War, For Peace: A Brief Overview, March 25 2001.; available at: http://snellings.telenet.be/womeninblackleuven/world_court_women.htm

  • Daniela Lai, “Transitional Justice and its Discontents: Socioeconomic Justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Limits of International Intervention,” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2016, pp. 361–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Anna Lithander, ed., Engendering the Peace Process: A Gender Approach to Dayton—and Beyond, Stockholm: The Kvinna till Kvinna Foundation, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger Mac Ginty, International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2011a

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roger Mac Ginty, ‘Hybrid Peace: How Does Hybrid Peace Come About?,’ in Susanna Campbell, David Chandler and Meera Sabaratnam, eds., A Liberal Peace?: The Problems and Practices of Peacebuilding, London and New York: Zed Books, 2011b, pp. 209–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumi Madhok and Shirin M. Rai, ‘Agency, Injury, and Transgressive Politics in Neoliberal Times,’ Signs, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2012, pp. 645–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laura S. Martin, ‘Practising Normality: An Examination of Unrecognizable Mechanisms in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone,’ Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2016, pp. 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieran McEvoy and Lorna McGregor, Transitional Justice From Below: Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change, Portland, OR: Hart, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Laura McLeod.Gender Politics and Security Discourse: Personal-Political Imaginations and Feminism in “Post-Conflict” Serbia. Abingdon: Routledge, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheila Meintjes, Anu Pillay and Meredith Turshen, eds., The Aftermath: Women in Post-Conflict Transformation, London: Zed Books, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Julie Mertus, ‘Shouting from the Bottom of the Well: The Impact of International Trials for Wartime Rape on Women’s Agency,’ International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2004, pp. 110–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriella Mishkowski and Gorana Mlinarević, The Trouble with Rape Trials – Views of Witnesses, Prosecutors and Judges on Prosecuting Sexualised Violence During the War in the Former Yugoslavia, Cologne: Medica Mondiale e.V., 2009.; available at http://www.peacewomen.org/assets/file/lawref_thetroublewithrapetrialsformeryugoslavia_medicamondiale_dec2009.pdf (accessed 29 December 2013)

  • Fionnuala Ní Aoláin and Catherine O’Rourke, “Gendered Transitional Justice and the Non-state Actor.” In Contested Transitions: Dilemmas of Transitional Justice in Colombia and Comparative Experience, eds., A. Lyons and M. Reed, Bogotá: International Center for Transitional Justice, 2010, pp. 115–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maria O’Reilly, ‘Muscular Interventionism: Gender, Power, and Liberal Peacebuilding in Post-Conflict Bosnia-Herzegovina,’ International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2012, pp. 529–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maria O’Reilly, ‘Gender and peacebuilding,’ in Roger Mac Ginty, ed., Routledge Handbook of Peacebuilding, Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge, 2013, pp. 57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Catherine O’Rourke, Gender Politics in Transitional Justice, Abingdon: Routledge, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Nela Porobić Isaković and Gorana Mlinarević, eds. 2016. The Concept and Framework for the Development of a Gender-Sensitive Reparations Program for Civilian Victims of War in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sarajevo: Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, Bosnia-Syria Initiative. Accessed April 28, 2016b. http://womenorganizingforchange.org/en/news/concept- and-framework-for-the-development-of-a-gender-sensitive-reparations-program-for-civilian-victi ms-of-war-in-bosnia-and-herzegovina/

  • Niamh Reilly and Linda Posluszny, Women Testify: A Planning Guide For Popular Tribunals. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Women’s Global Leadership, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver P. Richmond and Audra Mitchell, ‘Peacebuilding and Critical Forms of Agency: From Resistance to Subsistence,’ Alternatives, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2011, pp. 326–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon Robins, Families of the Missing, Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiona C. Ross, Bearing Witness: Women and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa, London: Pluto, 2003a

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiona C. Ross, ‘On Having Voice and Being Heard: Some After-Effects of Testifying Before the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, Anthropology Today, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2003b, pp. 325–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruth Rubio-Marín, ‘Introduction: A Gender and Reparations Taxonomy,’ in Ruth Rubio-Marín, ed., The Gender of Reparations: Unsettling Sexual Hierarchies While Redressing Human Rights Violations, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009a, pp. 1–17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruth Rubio-Marín, ‘The Gender of Reparations in Transitional Societies,’ in Ruth Rubio-Marín, ed., The Gender of Reparations: Unsettling Sexual Hierarchies While Redressing Human Rights Violations, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009b, pp. 63–120

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruth Rubio-Marín, ‘Gender and Collective Reparations in the Aftermath of Conflict and Political Repression,’ in Ruth Rubio-Marín, ed., The Gender of Reparations: Unsettling Sexual Hierarchies While Redressing Human Rights Violations, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009c, pp. 381–402

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruth Rubio-Marín, ed., The Gender of Reparations: Unsettling Sexual Hierarchies While Redressing Human Rights Violations, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009d

    Google Scholar 

  • Patricia Viseur Sellers and Kaoru Okuizumi, ‘Intentional Prosecution of Sexual Assaults,’ Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 7, 1997, pp. 45–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruti G. Teitel, ‘Transitional Justice Genealogy’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, Vol. 16, 2003, pp. 69–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly Theidon, ‘Gender in Transition: Common Sense, Women, and War,’ Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2007, pp. 453–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahla Valji, Gender Justice and Reconcliation, Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2007.; available at http://www.sarpn.org/documents/d0002922/Gender_justice_FES_Nov2007.pdf (accessed 12 December 2013)

  • Nahla Valji, A Window of Opportunity: Making Transitional Justice Work for Women. New York: UN Women, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zala Volčič and Olivera Simić, eds., Transitional Justice and Civil Society in the Balkans, New York: Springer, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Margaret Urban Walker, ‘Gender and Violence in Focus: A Background for Gender Justice in Reparations,’ in Ruth Rubio-Marín, ed., The Gender of Reparations: Unsettling Sexual Hierarchies While Redressing Human Rights Violations, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 18–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dubravka Žarkov and Cynthia Cockburn, The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping in Bosnia and the Netherlands, London: Lawrence & Wishart, 2002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

O’Reilly, M. (2018). Conclusion. In: Gendered Agency in War and Peace . Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-352-00145-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics